Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-06 Thread Richard Elling - PAE
Darren Dunham wrote: Let's say the devices are named thus (and I'm making this up): /devices/../../SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/WWN:sliceno [EMAIL PROTECTED] denotes the FLX380 frame, [0-6] [EMAIL PROTECTED],n denotes the virtual disk,LUN, [0-19],[0-3] How do I know that my strip

Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-06 Thread Darren Dunham
> Let's say the devices are named thus (and I'm making this up): > > /devices/../../SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/WWN:sliceno > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] denotes the FLX380 frame, [0-6] > [EMAIL PROTECTED],n denotes the virtual disk,LUN, [0-19],[0-3] > > How do I know that my stripes are

Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-06 Thread Christine Tran
This is a most interesting thread. I'm a little be-fuddled, though. How will ZFS know to select the RAID-Z2 stripes from each FLX380, because if it stripes the (5+2) from the LUNS within one FLX380, this will not help if one frame goes irreplaceably out of service. Let's say the devices are n

Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-06 Thread Torrey McMahon
+5 I've been saving my +1s for a few weeks now. ;) Richard Elling - PAE wrote: There is another option. I'll call it "grow into your storage." Pre-ZFS, for most systems you would need to allocate the storage well in advance of its use. For the 7xFLX380 case using SVM and UFS, you would typica

Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-06 Thread Richard Elling - PAE
There is another option. I'll call it "grow into your storage." Pre-ZFS, for most systems you would need to allocate the storage well in advance of its use. For the 7xFLX380 case using SVM and UFS, you would typically setup the FLX380 LUNs, merge them together using SVM, and newfs. Growing is s

Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-06 Thread Richard Elling - PAE
Oatway, Ted wrote: Thanks for the response Richard. Forgive my ignorance but the following questions come to mind as I read your response. I would then have to create 80 RAIDz(6+1) Volumes and the process of creating these Volumes can be scripted. But - 1) I would then have to create 80 mount p

Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-06 Thread Darren Dunham
> I would then have to create 80 RAIDz(6+1) Volumes and the process of > creating these Volumes can be scripted. But - > > 1) I would then have to create 80 mount points to mount each of these > Volumes (?) No. Each of the RAIDZs that you create can be combined into a single pool. Data written

RE: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-05 Thread Oatway, Ted
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 5:50 PM To: Oatway, Ted Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout Oatway, Ted wrote: > IHAC that has 560+ LUNs that will be assigned to ZFS Pools

Re: [zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-05 Thread Richard Elling - PAE
Oatway, Ted wrote: IHAC that has 560+ LUNs that will be assigned to ZFS Pools and some level of protection. The LUNs are provided by seven Sun StorageTek FLX380s. Each FLX380 is configured with 20 Virtual Disks. Each Virtual Disk presents four Volumes/LUNs. (4 Volumes x 20 Virtual Disks x 7 Di

[zfs-discuss] Need input on implementing a ZFS layout

2006-09-05 Thread Oatway, Ted
IHAC that has 560+ LUNs that will be assigned to ZFS Pools and some level of protection. The LUNs are provided by seven Sun StorageTek FLX380s. Each FLX380 is configured with 20 Virtual Disks. Each Virtual Disk presents four Volumes/LUNs.  (4 Volumes x 20 Virtual Disks x 7 Disk Arrays = 560