cedric briner writes:
> >> You might set zil_disable to 1 (_then_ mount the fs to be
> >> shared). But you're still exposed to OS crashes; those would
> >> still corrupt your nfs clients.
> Just to better understand ? (I know that I'm quite slow :( )
> when you say _nfs clients_ are you speci
You might set zil_disable to 1 (_then_ mount the fs to be
shared). But you're still exposed to OS crashes; those would
still corrupt your nfs clients.
Just to better understand ? (I know that I'm quite slow :( )
when you say _nfs clients_ are you specifically talking of:
- the nfs client program
Wee Yeh Tan writes:
> Robert,
>
> On 4/27/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Wee,
> >
> > Thursday, April 26, 2007, 4:21:00 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > WYT> On 4/26/07, cedric briner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> okay let'say that it is not. :)
> > >> Imagine that
Robert Milkowski writes:
> Hello Wee,
>
> Thursday, April 26, 2007, 4:21:00 PM, you wrote:
>
> WYT> On 4/26/07, cedric briner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> okay let'say that it is not. :)
> >> Imagine that I setup a box:
> >> - with Solaris
> >> - with many HDs (directly attached)
Behalf Of Wee Yeh Tan
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:40 PM
To: cedric briner
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] HowTo: UPS + ZFS & NFS + no fsync
Cedric,
On 4/26/07, cedric briner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> okay let'say that it is not. :)
> >> I
Cedric,
On 4/26/07, cedric briner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> okay let'say that it is not. :)
>> Imagine that I setup a box:
>> - with Solaris
>> - with many HDs (directly attached).
>> - use ZFS as the FS
>> - export the Data with NFS
>> - on an UPS.
>>
>> Then after reading the :
>
Robert,
On 4/27/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Wee,
Thursday, April 26, 2007, 4:21:00 PM, you wrote:
WYT> On 4/26/07, cedric briner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> okay let'say that it is not. :)
>> Imagine that I setup a box:
>> - with Solaris
>> - with many HDs (dire
Hello Wee,
Thursday, April 26, 2007, 4:21:00 PM, you wrote:
WYT> On 4/26/07, cedric briner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> okay let'say that it is not. :)
>> Imagine that I setup a box:
>> - with Solaris
>> - with many HDs (directly attached).
>> - use ZFS as the FS
>> - export the Data wit
On 26-Apr-07, at 11:57 AM, cedric briner wrote:
okay let'say that it is not. :)
Imagine that I setup a box:
- with Solaris
- with many HDs (directly attached).
- use ZFS as the FS
- export the Data with NFS
- on an UPS.
Then after reading the :
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/in
cedric briner writes:
> > You might set zil_disable to 1 (_then_ mount the fs to be
> > shared). But you're still exposed to OS crashes; those would
> > still corrupt your nfs clients.
> >
> > -r
>
> hello Roch,
>
> I've few questions
>
> 1)
> from:
>Shenanigans with ZFS flus
cedric briner wrote:
You might set zil_disable to 1 (_then_ mount the fs to be
shared). But you're still exposed to OS crashes; those would still
corrupt your nfs clients.
-r
hello Roch,
I've few questions
1)
from:
Shenanigans with ZFS flushing and intelligent arrays...
http://blogs
You might set zil_disable to 1 (_then_ mount the fs to be
shared). But you're still exposed to OS crashes; those would
still corrupt your nfs clients.
-r
hello Roch,
I've few questions
1)
from:
Shenanigans with ZFS flushing and intelligent arrays...
http://blogs.digitar.com/jjww/?itemid
okay let'say that it is not. :)
Imagine that I setup a box:
- with Solaris
- with many HDs (directly attached).
- use ZFS as the FS
- export the Data with NFS
- on an UPS.
Then after reading the :
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide#ZFS_and_Complex_St
On 4/26/07, Roch - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You might set zil_disable to 1 (_then_ mount the fs to be
shared). But you're still exposed to OS crashes; those would
still corrupt your nfs clients.
For the love of God do NOT do stuff like that.
Just create ZFS on a pile of disks the way t
You might set zil_disable to 1 (_then_ mount the fs to be
shared). But you're still exposed to OS crashes; those would
still corrupt your nfs clients.
-r
cedric briner writes:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if the subject of this email is not self-explanetory ?
>
>
> okay let'say that it is no
On 4/26/07, cedric briner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
okay let'say that it is not. :)
Imagine that I setup a box:
- with Solaris
- with many HDs (directly attached).
- use ZFS as the FS
- export the Data with NFS
- on an UPS.
Then after reading the :
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki
Hello,
I wonder if the subject of this email is not self-explanetory ?
okay let'say that it is not. :)
Imagine that I setup a box:
- with Solaris
- with many HDs (directly attached).
- use ZFS as the FS
- export the Data with NFS
- on an UPS.
Then after reading the :
http://www.solarisin
17 matches
Mail list logo
