Sriram,
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 12:04:22AM +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> >From the presentation "ZFS - The last word in filesystems", Page 22
> "In a multi-disk pool, ZFS survives any non-consecutive disk failures"
>
> Questions:
> If I have a 3 disk RAIDZ with disks A, B and C, then:
>
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Frank Cusack wrote:
>
> what mirror? there is no mirror. you have a raidz. you can have 1
> disk failure.
Thanks for the correction. I was thinking RAIDZ, but typed "mirror". I
have only RAIDZs on my servers.
>
>> - if disks a and c fail, then I will be be able
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> No. That quote is part of the discussion of ditto blocks.
>
> See the following:
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/bill/entry/ditto_blocks_the_amazing_tape
>
Thank you, Peter.
-- Sriram
___
zfs-discuss mai
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> >From the presentation "ZFS - The last word in filesystems", Page 22
>"In a multi-disk pool, ZFS survives any non-consecutive disk failures"
>
> Questions:
> If I have a 3 disk RAIDZ with disks A, B and C, then:
> - if disk b fails,
On February 8, 2009 12:04:22 AM +0530 Sriram Narayanan
wrote:
>> From the presentation "ZFS - The last word in filesystems", Page 22
> "In a multi-disk pool, ZFS survives any non-consecutive disk failures"
>
> Questions:
> If I have a 3 disk RAIDZ with disks A, B and C, then:
> - if disk b
>From the presentation "ZFS - The last word in filesystems", Page 22
"In a multi-disk pool, ZFS survives any non-consecutive disk failures"
Questions:
If I have a 3 disk RAIDZ with disks A, B and C, then:
- if disk b fails, then will I be able to continue to read data if
disks A and C are
