On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:02 +, Brandon High wrote:
> The instance runs as zfssnap and the user *should* be able to change
> values in smf, right?
Yes - I think that's a bug - it looks like the SMF zfs/ propgroup should
have value_authorization set as well.
You can workaround this by doing:
#
I hit the wrong button when moderating the post to zfs-auto-snapshot@
mailing list. I'm forwarding the original mail from Brandon below.
Summarising Brandon's questions:
* how to best create SMF instances on an existing service
* why are there permission errors when running a new instance creat
Hi all,
Just forwarding Niall's heads-up message about the impending removal of
the existing zfs-auto-snapshot implementation in nv_128
I've not been involved in the rewrite, but what I've read about the new
code, it'll be a lot more efficient than the old ksh-based code, and
will fix many of the
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 01:32 -0700, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Go back and look through the archives for this list. We just had this
> discussion last month. Let's not rehash it again, as it seems to get
> redone way too often.
You know, this seems like such a common question to the list, would we
(t
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 10:00 +0200, Juergen Nickelsen wrote:
> DL Consulting writes:
> Do not use the snapshots made for the time slider feature. These are
> under control of the auto-snapshot service for exactly the time
> slider and not for anything else.
- or you could use the auto-snapshot:
Hi Ross,
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 04:24 -0700, Ross wrote:
> Thanks Tim, do you know which build this is going to appear in?
I've actually no idea - SUNWzfs-auto-snapshot gets delivered by the
Desktop consolidation, not me. I'm checking in with them to see what the
story is.
That said, it probably
Hi all,
Just a quick plug: the latest version of ZFS Automatic Snapshots SMF
service hit the hg repository yesterday.
If you're using 0.11 or older, it's well worth upgrading to get the few
bugfixes (especially if you're using CIFs - we use '_' instead of ':' in
snapshot names now)
More at:
http
Hi Victor,
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 08:35 -0700, Victor Kramer wrote:
> Any news regarding this problem?
> I could not find any workaround or fix for this problem.
> Any ideas when this one might be fixed?
8683: time slider cleanup doesn't clean up ZFS volume snapshots.
http://defect.opensolaris.org
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 06:52 -0700, Maurilio Longo wrote:
> I really was trying to have a full copy of my pool onto a different
> pc, so I think that I have to use -R otherwise I would loose all the
> history (monthly and weekly and daily snapshots) of my data which is
> valuable for me.
Fair enou
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 05:38 -0700, Maurilio Longo wrote:
> Now, from the error it seems that T1 needs all the snapshots which
> were active at the time it was created, which is not what I would
> expect from a snapshot.
>From the man page, -R tries to replicate everything, including any
existing
Hi Harry,
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 16:59 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> How can I make zfs give some shorter kind of names to the auto snapshots
> it takes.
>
> I'd like to alter the date string and shorten like this:
>
> zfs-auto-snap:frequent-2009-04-15-16:30
> Would become:
> a:freq-041509_16
This is a known bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6749498
- being a duplicate of an existing bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6462803
cheers,
tim
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:07 -0800, Robert Bauer wrote:
> Time slider is not wo
Hi there,
William Bauer wrote:
> Interesting that the weekly snapshots run on Monday. Shows the
> difference in thinking of when a week begins or ends. In the future,
> it would be nice to have more control over the slider's settings,
The core auto-snapshot service will have this support in nv_
hi Rich,
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:51 -0500, Richard Morris - Sun Microsystems -
Burlington United States wrote:
> As you point out, the -c option is user friendly while the -depth (or
> maybe -d) option is more general. There have been several requests for
> the -c option. Would anyone prefer
Hi Charles,
Charles wrote:
> And for timf, I have red your pages, but I don't understand what to
> do. In the bug report, the workaround is to unmount and mount the
> filesystem, but I don't know how to do this with zfs.
>
> When I enter "zfs list" I get that:
>
> rpool/ROOT/opensolaris 8,96
Hi there,
Charles wrote:
> I'm a new user of OpenSolaris 2008.11, I switched from Linux to try
> the time-slider, but now when I execute the time-slider I get this
> message:
>
> http://img115.imageshack.us/my.php?image=capturefentresansnomfx9.png
I wish we'd release-noted this particular proble
Paweł Tęcza wrote:
> Dnia 2008-11-25, wto o godzinie 23:16 +0100, Paweł Tęcza pisze:
>
>> Also I'm very curious whether I can configure Time Slider to taking
>> backup every 2 or 4 or 8 hours, for example.
>
> Or set the max number of snapshots?
Yes you can (though not in the time-slider gui yet
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 13:02 +0100, Luca Morettoni wrote:
> Warning - Invalid account: 'zfssnap' not allowed to execute cronjobs
Does there exist an entry for zfssnap in /etc/passwd? This was added to
nv_100 and works fine for SXCE:
6750041 Need zfssnap role account for LSARC/2008/571
I wonder i
Niall Power wrote:
> Bueller? Anyone?
Yeah, I'd love to know the answer too. The furthest I got into
investigating this last time was:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2007-December/044787.html
- does that help at all Niall?
The context to Niall's question is to extend Time Sli
Chris Gerhard wrote:
I'm not sure there's an easy way to please everyone to be honest :-/
I'm not sure you are right there. If there was an SMF property that you
set to set the default behaviour and then you set it to true on
something that looked like a laptop and false otherwise. Or you cou
Chris Gerhard wrote:
> Not quite. I want to make the default for all pools imported or not to
> not do this and then turn it on where it makes sense and won't do harm.
Aah I see. That's the complete opposite of what the desktop folk wanted
then - you want to opt-in, instead of opt-out.
For de
Chris Gerhard wrote:
> This could be my misunderstanding of the parts of this. When I disabled
> the auto-snapshot resulted in timeslider being disabled too.
Yep, time-slider depends on auto-snapshot.
> So what does the timeslider service do?
It's a service written by the desktop guys that adds
Hi Chris,
Chris Gerhard wrote:
> With auto-snapshot still on are all the snapshots taken as a single
> transaction as they would be with a recursive snapshot?
Yep, it uses "zfs snapshot -r" when it can, degrading to snapshots of
the individual datasets it can't recursively snapshot and recursiv
Hi Chris,
Chris Gerhard wrote:
> How can you disable the auto-snapshot service[s] by default without
> disabling the timeslider
> as well which appears to be the case if you disable the smf services.
Not sure I follow - time slider depends on the auto-snapshot service to
take snapshots... (doe
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 22:40 -0700, Alex Peng wrote:
> Is it fun to have autocomplete in zpool or zfs command?
>
> For instance -
>
> "zfs cr 'Tab key' " will become "zfs create"
> "zfs clone 'Tab key' " will show me the available snapshots
> "zfs set 'Tab key' " will show me the avail
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 10:19 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That snap schedule seems reasonable to me. Relate to the cleanup part
> of the doc linked, do you know the rational for killing off the most recent
> (15 minute and hourly) snaps vs the oldest (monthly) first?
It's a tough call (w
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> nobody is going to assume user's intentions. Just give us
> snapshot-related property which we can set to on/off and everybody
> can setup zfs according to his/her needs.
Then that'll be there in nv_100. Enjoy!
cheers,
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:07 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:43:51AM +0200, Nils Goroll wrote:
> Storage Checkpoints in Veritas software has this feature (removing
> the oldest checkpoint in case of 100% filesystem usage) by default.
> Why not add such option to ZFS ?
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 03:53 -0700, Ross wrote:
> We're looking at autohome folders for windows users over CIFS, but I'm
> wondering how that is going to affect our backup strategy. I was
> hoping to be able to use your automatic snapshot service on these
> servers, do you know how that service wou
Hi all,
I've just pushed some of the changes coming up in 0.11
hg clone ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/jds/zfs-snapshot
I've got some commentary on the Early Access nature of this release at:
http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_automatic_snapshots_0_11
Comments (and bug reports) welcome!
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:58 -0700, Rob wrote:
> > The other changes that will appear in 0.11 (which is
> > nearly done) are:
>
> Still looking forward to seeing .11 :)
Wow, there's one user out there at least! Thanks!
> Think we can expect a release soon? (or at least svn access so
> that othe
Hey Nils,
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 05:57 -0700, Nils Goroll wrote:
> This does sound like a valid alternative solution for this requirement if you
> want to avoid using "at", though this will involve additional complexity for
> parsing timestamps of existing snapshots and calculating intervals, which
Hey Nils,
Nils Goroll wrote:
but in cases where you're powering down a laptop overnight,
you don't want to just take a load of snapshots after you power on for
every missed cron job, you just want one
This is precisely what the at solution is doing: As there is only one
at job for each zfs sna
Hey Nils & everyone
Finally getting around to answering Nil's mail properly - only a month
late! I thought I'd also let everyone else know what's been going on
with the service, since 0.10 released in January this year.
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 14:40 -0700, Nils Goroll wrote:
> first of all: Tim,
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 13:01 +0200, Mark Phalan wrote:
> > Both of these would result in a new dataset cube/builds/darrenm/6724478
>
> I find this annoying as well. Another way that would help (but is fairly
> orthogonal to your suggestion) would be to write a completion module for
> zsh/bash/whate
Hey Nils,
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 09:37 -0700, Nils Goroll wrote:
> I'll attach a new version zfs-auto-snapshot including some more
> improvements, and probably some new bugs.
Just to let you know that I *have* seen your mails on this and really
appreciate getting the feedback, but I just haven't h
Hi Joerg,
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:09 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Tim Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 13:47 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Isn't flar based on the outdated cpio?
> >
> > cpio was updated to support ZFS
Hey Joerg,
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 13:47 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > How about flar ?
> > http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-5668/flash-24?a=view
> > [ I'm actually not sure if it's supported for zfs root though ]
>
> Isn't flar based on the outdated cpio?
cpio was updated to support ZFS A
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:44 +0800, Aubrey Li wrote:
> for windows we use ghost to backup system and recovery.
> can we do similar thing for solaris by ZFS?
How about flar ?
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-5668/flash-24?a=view
[ I'm actually not sure if it's supported for zfs root though ]
get rid of this pool?
Yep, here's one way: zpool export other pools on the system, then
delete /etc/zfs/zpool.cache, reboot the machine then do a zpool import
for each of the other pools you want to keep.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Sol
by me.
[ just thought I'd ask ]
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
Template Version: @(#)onepager.txt 1.31 07/08/08 SMI
[ timf note: this is still a Draft, last updated 02/04/2008
using the templ
al (and
perhaps integrates more neatly with the rest of ZFS) ?
Otherwise, should I start filling in an ARC one-pager template or is
this sort of utility something that's better left to sysadmins to
implement themselves, rather than baking it into the OS ?
cheers,
nt
"zfs recv" command to the pool provided by your backup device might be
just what you're after.
Perhaps this is a project for the Christmas holidays :-)
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun
toring flat-files (which no archiver can currently
read - the only way of getting at the contents is "zfs recv" to another
zfs dataset)
Hope this helps?
cheers,
tim
[1] Yeah, I work in zfs-test, and haven't fully tested my own softwar
ng to find a cleaner way than
http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_on_your_desktop
to tie the client and server sides together.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
ctory is being
either backed up, and/or included in snapshots.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
heers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
; Tested on b75a and b75a xVm should also work with b70, etc.
>
> kugutsumen
>
> You can find a patch for Tim's script here:
> http://www.kugutsumen.com/showthread.php?t=1740
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ____________
ache, since docs.sun.com seems a bit sluggish
at the mo)
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:vPL5YJPV2GIJ:docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/6n7ht6qs6%3Fa%3Dview+zfs+legacy+filesystems&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=firefox-a
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems I
Hi all,
I just posted some stuff about a simple ZFS automatic backup service to
my blog:
http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_automatic_backup_0_1
- all thoughts/comments (and bug reports!) welcome
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris
_massacre
and I've another one that will also do this for you:
http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_automatic_snapshots_0_8
I'm sure there's other scripts floating around, which may be more suited
to your requirements but these are a start at least.
cheers,
r we go on the zpool.cache
file. If that file isn't present, you'll need to manually zpool import
pools in order for the system to see them.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
hi Jürgen,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 05:04 -0700, Jürgen Keil wrote:
> How about a new feature for "zpool create" and "zfs create" to
> allow creation of a zpool or zfs that is not using the newest
> version but some older version
Yep, that's there already - PSARC 2007/328 gives "zfs upgrade" and y
ool list does not seem to be listing those,
"zpool import" should show the pools that are available for import -
does this help ?
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
_
# zpool create pool c2t1d0s1
invalid vdev specification
use '-f' to override the following errors:
/dev/dsk/c2t1d0s1 contains a ufs filesystem.
# zpool create -f pool c2t1d0s1
#
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
changing the pool state nvpair in
the vdev_label (if I'm not mistaken - section 1.3.3 in the on-disk
format document covers this.)
cheers,
tim
[1]
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/ondiskformat0822.pdf
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsyste
Hi Doug,
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 06:45 -0700, Douglas Atique wrote:
> Hi, Tim. Thanks for your hints.
No problem
> Comments on each one follow (marked with "Doug:" and in blue).
html mail :-/
> Tim Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a
uggestions help ?
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Linkert wrote:
I have one thing happening now at boot which must have happened
> during the migration to zfs boot. I get an error message about
> /dev/random: "No randomness provider enabled for /dev/random.
> Use cryptoadm to provide one." Does anyone know how to fix this?
info/zfs-discuss>
>
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org <mailto:zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 10:54 -0400, Luke Scharf wrote:
> Tim Foster wrote:
> > You can add a disk to a raidz configuration, but then that makes a pool
> > containing 1 raidz + 1 additional disk in a dynamic stripe configuration
> > (which ZFS will warn you about, since you
LINE 0 0 0
/tmp/1 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/2 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/3 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/4ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
#
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun M
Hi All,
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:33 +0100, Tim Foster wrote:
(replying to myself, I know, I know)
> Yep - I'll be working this weekend on updating the previous
> "mountrootadm.sh" script that I wrote when the previous ZFS Mountroot
> (ufs boot + a quick switcheroo to zfs
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Tim Fost
Hi all,
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:23 -0700, Lin Ling wrote:
> We will make the manual and netinstall instructions available to
> non-SWAN folks shortly.
>
> Tim Foster also has a script to do the set up, wait for his blog.
Just put that blog post up - you can find it at
http://b
available
* ability to use free space on the root pool, making it
available for other uses (by setting a reservation on the root
filesystem, you can ensure that / always has sufficient available
space)
- am I missing any others ?
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Micros
he case where those blocks aren't referenced by a
previous snapshot, in which case the data isn't unreferenced.
hope this helps,
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
more useful in the future.
Hope this helps ?
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing
t_magic
Matt has mentioned some additional features to zfs send/recv coming
soon, including ways to send all incremental snapshots, send nested
filesystem, and ways to preserve filesystem properties while sending.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solari
eally want i/o throttling of send/recv operations as
against "normal" pool operations - I don't know enough to suggest how
this could be implemented (except via brutal pstop/prun hacks on the
"zfs send" process whenever your pool exceeds some given IO threshold)
hysical
disks, the better.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c3t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c3t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c3t6d0 UNAVAIL 0 679
t;, then remove the disk, replace
with working hardware, and do "zpool online "
This is pretty well covered in the ZFS Administration Guide at:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/6n7ht6qrt?a=view
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsyste
nal.dat
# zfs receive -d extra/restore < /tmp/extra-latest.dat
cannot receive: most recent snapshot does not match incremental source
Okay, restore that first, and we're okay.
# zfs receive -d extra/restore < /tmp/extra-recent.dat
# zfs receive -d extra/restore < /tmp/extra-latest
aluation. I'll also keep an eye out for those pools during
testing.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.sun.com/timf
d on:
> $ uname -a
> SunOS azalin 5.10 Generic_118833-24 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500
I wasn't able to reproduce this on similar bits, nor on recent s10 bits
(ultimately destined for s10_u3) or nevada bits. Do you have a
consistently reproducible test case ?
cheers,
mes said :-)
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
two machines ?
Does "ssh -v" tell you any more ?
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Boot comes
along, but in the meantime it scratches an itch!
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing lis
ssing about with in my free
time - it's not an official ZFS project and may not be bullet-proof
enough for production.
It works for me, but bug reports would be appreciated ;-)
cheers,
tim
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris Engineering Ops
http://blo
was
playing with too...
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ys are thrilled at the prospect DTrace on
their platform.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing l
said,
the devil's in the details (I'm paraphrasing), but I'm only speculating
here - don't have anything concrete.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.
27;ll get your people to port iTunes to
OpenSolaris for us[1] ?)
cheers,
tim
[1] http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/timf?entry=zfs_on_osx
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.sun.com
Och, sorry - a clarification might needed to my reply:
Tim Foster wrote:
Darren Dunham wrote:
I meant, rather than taring it up, can you just pass the snapshot mount
point to Networker as a saveset?
Yup, in my brief testing, I was able to backup a snapdir using
Networker.
... ** with the
t; here, in which
case, no I didn't run into any problems, but see the disclaimer above.
Does Networker traditionally scan /etc/vfstab in any way ? If it doesn't
then I'm guessing you shouldn't have any problems.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun
ntents, not the exact configuration of
the pool they once sat in (especially if I'm only doing the restore
because I've found (the hard way) that I need a more reliable disk
replication setup...)
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Op
the system for.
I've got an old 733Mhz PentiumIII machine running the latest Nevada
build, which happily runs ZFS -- it gets used as a simple backup via
rsync server once a month or so, and happily manages ~180gb of data.
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun
losed in parenthesis) from df instead.
does this help ?
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discus
dow. I was
thinking that RFE 6425091 or 6370738 was what I was waiting for, but
views would make this even easier to implement.
cheers,
tim
[1] http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/timf?entry=zfs_on_your_desktop
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating
of stored
> file depends on who's doing the deletion)
Aah right, okay - those are reasons against my previous post about
having an application register it's interest in getting undelete
capability. Good points Eric!
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, S
ifically (and explicitly)
> > support RecycleBin in the design).
> >
> >
> >
> > You will notice that Windows does this. The Recycle Bin is usable from
> > within Windows Explorer, but if you use "del" from a command prompt, it
> > actually
Oh, and if you hadn't noticed, Alo also did some desktop integration
work, concerning ACLs recently, at
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/alvaro#gnome_zfs_and_the_acl ]
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp:
he console is running.
Guess I need to work out how to use wcadmin now :-)
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailma
heers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group
Engineering Operationshttp://blogs.sun.com/timf
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hey Constantin,
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 11:37 +0200, Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
> I took the liberty of renaming the thread to $SUBJECT because I think that
> what
> we really are looking for is an ability for ZFS to automatically manage
> snapshot
> after they have been created.
Wow, nice summa
97 matches
Mail list logo
