On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 10:19 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That snap schedule seems reasonable to me. Relate to the cleanup part
> of the doc linked, do you know the rational for killing off the most recent
> (15 minute and hourly) snaps vs the oldest (monthly) first?
It's a tough call (which thankfully I didn't have to make). I'm not sure
there was a rationale, other than the guys who were implementing it
messing about on their desktops finding out where /they/ tended to get
the most savings.
Really, it all depends on how volatile your filesystems are, where the
best place to retrieve data from. I suspect it'll take more real-user
testing to determine what's the best balance between data availability
and disk space.
cheers,
tim
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
