Robert Thurlow wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> > Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
> > test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
> > other options ?
>
> By all means, test with ZFS. But it's
Ian Collins wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Norm Jacobs wrote:
> >> Roland Mainz wrote:
> >>> Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
> >>> "yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
> &g
Norm Jacobs wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
> > "yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
> > etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
>
> I have some vague recollection t
Hi!
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
"yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Su
Kris Larsen wrote:
>
> Thanks. It works for GNU-style chmod usage.
Erm... technically this isn't GNU "chmod", it's a different "chmod"
implementation which includes GNU+BSD+MacOSX options...
> But aren't ACL's supported?
No, not yet... but it's on my todo list (the tricky part is to find the
pe
Kris Larsen wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> How can I prevent /usr/bin/chmod from following symbolic links? I can't find
> any -P option in the documentation (and it doesn't work either..). Maybe find
> can be used in some way?
[snip]
Try:
1. Start ksh93
$ ksh93
2. Load "chmod" builtin command
$ builtin
Bill Shannon wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > What's the exact filename and how often are the accesses ? Is this an
> > interactive shell or is this a script (an interactive shell session will
> > do periodical lookups for things like the MAIL*-variables (see ksh(1)
>
Bill Shannon wrote:
> Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
> >> Ok, that's much better! At least I'm getting output when I touch files
> >> on zfs. However, even though zpool iostat is reporting activity, the
> >> above program isn't showing any file accesse
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Tim Haley wrote:
> > Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > Bart Smaalders wrote:
> > >> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > >>> I'm unable to find more info about this. E.g., what does "reject file
> > >>> names" mean i
Tim Haley wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Bart Smaalders wrote:
> >> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> >>> I'm unable to find more info about this. E.g., what does "reject file
> >>> names" mean in practice? E.g., if a program tries to create a fil
Bart Smaalders wrote:
> Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > I'm unable to find more info about this. E.g., what does "reject file
> > names" mean in practice? E.g., if a program tries to create a file
> > using an utf8-incompatible filename, what happens? Does the fopen()
> > fail? Would this normally be a p
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:55:15AM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 12:31:28PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 12:18:05PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
&
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 12:31:28PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 12:18:05PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > > Couldn't wait for ZFS delegation, so I cobbled something together; see
> > > attachment.
> >
> > I forgot to slap on the CDDL heade
Roland Mainz wrote:
> April Chin wrote:
> > I'm in the process of filing manpage bugs for ksh93 to include
> > changes to existing pages and new manpages for ksh93(1) and its
> > builtins (builtin(1), disown(1)).
> >
> > CR 6457823 New manpages needed for k
Scott Dickson wrote:
> A customer asked today about the ability to snapshot and rollback
> individual files. They have an environment where users might generate
> lots of files, but want only a portion of them to be included in a
> snapshot. Moreover, typically when they recover a file, they only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Well, I don't know about his particular case, but many QFS clients
> >have found the separation of da ta and metadata to be invaluable. The
> >primary reason is that it avoids disk seeks. We have QFS cust omers who
> >are running at over 90% of theoretical bandwidth o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >UNIX admin wrote:
> >> > There's still an opening in the shared filesystem
> >> > space (multi-reader
> >> > and multi-writer). Fix QFS, or extend ZFS?
> >>
> >> That one's a no-brainer, innit? Extend ZFS and plough on.
> >
> >Uhm... I think this is not that easy. Based
Lori Alt wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Will the initial ZFS root filesystem putback include support for system
> > suspend (see sys-suspend(1M)) on SPARC ?
> It is our intention to support system suspend on SPARC
> when booted off a zfs root file system.
That would b
Hi!
Will the initial ZFS root filesystem putback include support for system
suspend (see sys-suspend(1M)) on SPARC ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090
(;O/ \/ \
UNIX admin wrote:
>
> > There's still an opening in the shared filesystem
> > space (multi-reader
> > and multi-writer). Fix QFS, or extend ZFS?
>
> That one's a no-brainer, innit? Extend ZFS and plough on.
Uhm... I think this is not that easy. Based on IRC feedback I think it
may be difficult t
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> James Dickens wrote:
> > I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
> > so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
> > space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
> > take 5000 snapshots its his filesys
Hi!
Is there any interest to turn the "zfs" utility (to clarify: This is
about a change in the "zfs" utility itself, not about any "language
bindings" etc.) from it's (currently) "homegrown" command-line parsing
code over to ksh93/libshell.so (this has been proposed by Amersham/GE
Healthcar
22 matches
Mail list logo
