On Qui, 2008-11-13 at 16:07 -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
> If you can find a small drive laying around, here is another option
> that might work, but you could lose the whole pool due to some
> miscalculation or another mistake:
>
> 1. make a new, small 1-drive zpool on the small drive
>
> 2. mak
Hi Richard,
On Qua, 2008-10-22 at 14:04 -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> It is more important to use a separate disk, than to use a separate and fast
> disk. Anecdotal evidence suggests that using a USB hard disk works
> well.
While I don't necessarily disagree with your statement, please note tha
On Sex, 2008-10-10 at 11:23 -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
> But I haven't actually heard a reasonable proposal for what a
> fsck-like tool (i.e. one that could "repair" things automatically) would
> actually *do*, let alone how it would work in the variety of situations
> it needs to (compressed RAID-
Hi Jeff,
On Sex, 2008-10-10 at 01:26 -0700, Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> > The circumstances where I have lost data have been when ZFS has not
> > handled a layer of redundancy. However, I am not terribly optimistic
> > of the prospects of ZFS on any device that hasn't committed writes
> > that ZFS thin
Hi John,
On Qui, 2008-09-11 at 20:23 -0600, John Antonio wrote:
> It is operating with Sol 10 u3 and also u4. Sun support is claiming
> the issue is related to quiet corruptions.
Probably, yes.
> Since the ZFS structure was not cleanly exported because of the event
> (Node crash), the statement
Hi Jack,
On Qui, 2008-09-11 at 15:37 -0700, Jack Dumson wrote:
> Issues with ZFS and Sun Cluster
>
> If a cluster node crashes and HAStoragePlus resource group containing
> ZFS structure (ie. Zpool) is transitioned to a surviving node, the
> zpool import can cause the surviving node to panic.
On Ter, 2008-06-03 at 23:33 +0100, Paulo Soeiro wrote:
> 6)Remove and attached the usb sticks:
>
> zpool status
> pool: myPool
> state: UNAVAIL
> status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is
> missing
> or invalid. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue
> f
Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
Hi;
I am regularly making ZFS presentations and
everybody is
asking for when they can use ZFS as a cluster file system.(active
active at
least 2 nodes)
Any idea?
Hi Mertol,
Lustre 1.8 is scheduled to be released this summer, and it will inclu
Hi Owen,
Owen Davies wrote:
I'm not sure of the implications of Luster using ZFS DMU. Does this mean a subset of ZFS functionality, binary compatibility of written disks or what?
It means Lustre will be using ZFS (instead of ext4/ldiskfs) as its disk
storage backend in metadata and ob
Steve McKinty wrote:
1) First issue relates to the überblock. Updates to it are assumed to be atomic, but if the replication block size is smaller than the überblock then we can't guarantee that the whole überblock is replicated as an entity. That could in theory result in a corrupt überbl
10 matches
Mail list logo
