19246.
>
> Is there a patch that was not included with 10_Recommended?
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/lis
_
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Mike Dotson
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ter/failover, etc), could be
either or.
>
> Thanks for any help and advice.
>
> Brian.
>
>
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Mike Dotson
your first partition
starts with p1 and so forth.
Hope that helps. If you want, post your fdisk partition table if you
want a second set of eyes.
> Boris.
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ______
none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
lpool ONLINE 0 0 0
c0d0p4ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
So to create the pool in my case would be: zpool create lpool c0d0p4
--
Mike Dotson
> > can someone belt me with a cluestick please?
> >
> >
> > This message posted from opensolaris.org
> > ___
> > zfs-discuss mailing list
> > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > http
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 15:46 -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 03:39:11PM -0700, Mike Dotson wrote:
> >
> > In fact the console-login depends on filesystem/minimal which to me
> > means minimal file systems not all file systems and there is no software
>
first accessed.
Agreed but there's still the issue with console-login being dependent on
all file systems instead of minimal file systems.
>
> - Eric
>
>
> --
> Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock
--
Mike Dotson
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 15:50 -0600, Lori Alt wrote:
> Mike Dotson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:29 -0600, Lori Alt wrote:
>
> > Would help in many cases where an admin needs to work on a system but
> > doesn't need, say 20k users home directories mounted,
k users home directories mounted, to do this work.
>
> Lori
> _______
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Mike Dotson
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
once I've got large numbers of filesystems and snapshots
> and clones thereof, and the odd zvol, it can be a devil of
> a job to work out what's going on.
No more difficult than doing ufs/vxfs snapshots and quick I/O, etc.
Only thing that really changes is the specific command for each and if
you're doing that, then you've already got the infrastructure for it
setup.
But that's just my viewpoint...
--
Mike Dotson
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> Peter Tribble wrote:
> > On 4/24/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> With reference to Lori's blog posting[1] I'd like
> to throw out a few of
> >> my thoughts on spliting up the namespace.
> >
> > Just a plea with my sysadmin hat on - please don't
> go overboard
> > and make ne
we aren't
> able to dump into a zvol yet.)
>
Will we need to use this kit for further builds or will it be updated
for new builds as they arrive?
> Lori
>
> _______
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
