Re: [zfs-discuss] S11 vs illumos zfs compatiblity

2012-01-04 Thread Michael Sullivan
just fine. You can't enable dedup on a dataset > and any writes won't dedup they will "rehydrate". > > So it is more like partial dedup support rather than it not being there at > all. "rehydrate"??? Is it instant or freeze dried? Mike - --- Michael

Re: [zfs-discuss] commercial zfs-based storage replication software?

2011-10-01 Thread Michael Sullivan
ing with your Oracle Sales Rep. I think his requirements are being driven by a PHB who wants to see a "GUI". crontab, ssh - functionality already there, simple and not many "moving parts" but obviously too obfuscated for the PHB to understand. Good luck. Mike ---

Re: [zfs-discuss] commercial zfs-based storage replication software?

2011-09-30 Thread Michael Sullivan
. DR site) and be > accessible there. > > -- > Fajar > ___ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss Mike --- Michael Sullivan m...@axsh.us http://www.a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disable ZIL - persistent

2011-08-05 Thread Michael Sullivan
er than rpool. Which feels kludgy. Is there a better way? > > echo "set zfs:zil_disable = 1" > /etc/system echo "set zfs:zil_disable = 1" >> /etc/system Mike --- Michael Sullivan m...@axsh.us http://www.axsh.us/ Phone: +1-662-259- Mob

Re: [zfs-discuss] Resizing ZFS partition, shrinking NTFS?

2011-06-17 Thread Michael Sullivan
e using an external USB drive which was appropriately sized and turn on autoexpand. Mike --- Michael Sullivan m...@axsh.us http://www.axsh.us/ Phone: +1-662-259- Mobile: +1-662-202-7716 ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@open

Re: [zfs-discuss] question about COW and snapshots

2011-06-17 Thread Michael Sullivan
in use at a time and operations would need to be transaction based with commits and rollbacks. Way off-topic, but Smalltalk and its variants do this by maintaining the state of everything in an operating environment image. But then again, I could be wrong. Mike --- Michael Sullivan

Re: [zfs-discuss] A few questions

2011-01-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
perMicro is one of the brands of choice, but even then one must adhere to a fairly tight HCL. The same holds true for Solaris/OpenSolaris with third-party hardware. SATA Controllers and multiplexers are also another example of the drivers being written by the manufacturer and Solaris/OpenSolaris

Re: [zfs-discuss] (Fletcher+Verification) versus (Sha256+No Verification)

2011-01-06 Thread Michael Sullivan
, not me. For my home media server, maybe, but even then I'd hate to lose any of my family photos or video due to a hash collision. I'll play it safe if I dedup. Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Mobile: +1-662-202-7716 US Phon

Re: [zfs-discuss] Running on Dell hardware?

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Sullivan
Linux on any hardware as well. Then your hardware and software issues would probably be multiplied even more. Cheers, Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599 US Phone: +1-561-283-2034 On 23 Oct 2010, at 12:53

Re: [zfs-discuss] why both dedup and compression?

2010-05-06 Thread Michael Sullivan
rks really well. > > -- > -Peter Tribble > http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ > ___ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss Mi

Re: [zfs-discuss] Loss of L2ARC SSD Behaviour

2010-05-06 Thread Michael Sullivan
ead a block from more devices simultaneously, it will cut the latency of the overall read. On 7 May 2010, at 02:57 , Marc Nicholas wrote: > Hi Michael, > > What makes you think striping the SSDs would be faster than round-robin? > > -marc > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:09 PM,

Re: [zfs-discuss] Loss of L2ARC SSD Behaviour

2010-05-06 Thread Michael Sullivan
anything to come close in its approach to disk data management. Let's just hope it keeps moving forward, it is truly a unique way to view disk storage. Anyway, sorry for the ramble, but to everyone, thanks again for the answers. Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@m

Re: [zfs-discuss] Loss of L2ARC SSD Behaviour

2010-05-05 Thread Michael Sullivan
On 6 May 2010, at 13:18 , Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: Michael Sullivan [mailto:michael.p.sulli...@mac.com] >> >> While it explains how to implement these, there is no information >> regarding failure of a device in a striped L2ARC set of SSD's. I have > &

Re: [zfs-discuss] Loss of L2ARC SSD Behaviour

2010-05-05 Thread Michael Sullivan
Hi Ed, Thanks for your answers. Seem to make sense, sort of… On 6 May 2010, at 12:21 , Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sullivan >> >> I have a question I canno

Re: [zfs-discuss] Loss of L2ARC SSD Behaviour

2010-05-04 Thread Michael Sullivan
Ok, thanks. So, if I understand correctly, it will just remove the device from the VDEV and continue to use the good ones in the stripe. Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599 US Phone: +1-561-283-2034 On 5

[zfs-discuss] Loss of L2ARC SSD Behaviour

2010-05-04 Thread Michael Sullivan
m to find an answer. Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599 US Phone: +1-561-283-2034 ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.ope

Re: [zfs-discuss] Oracle to no longer support ZFS on OpenSolaris?

2010-04-23 Thread Michael Sullivan
, Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599 US Phone: +1-561-283-2034 On 23 Apr 2010, at 10:22 , BM wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote: >> Greetings All: >> >> G

Re: [zfs-discuss] Increase size of ZFS mirror

2009-06-24 Thread Michael Sullivan
hings - especially with ZFS. It's easy to throw together a configuration of what you have and what you want to do with it. Many times I do things in VirtaulBox before messing with my *real* data. Cheers, Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Ja

Re: [zfs-discuss] recursive snaptshot

2009-06-23 Thread Michael Sullivan
Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599 US Phone: +1-561-283-2034 On 24 Jun 2009, at 01:01 , Harry Putnam wrote: Darren J Moffat writes: Harry Putnam wrote: I thought I recalled reading somewhere that in the situation

Re: [zfs-discuss] recursive snaptshot

2009-06-23 Thread Michael Sullivan
p zfs set nosnap=yes rpool/dump In order to exclude file systems I don't really care about snapshots. That would be handier than having to remove them every time. Cheers, Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599 US Phone:

Re: [zfs-discuss] two pools on boot disk?

2009-06-21 Thread Michael Sullivan
ut I haven't tried it out yet. Regards, Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com http://www.kamiogi.net/ Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599 US Phone: +1-561-283-2034 On 22 Jun 2009, at 11:00 , Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote: One

Re: [zfs-discuss] two pools on boot disk?

2009-06-20 Thread Michael Sullivan
with namespace collisions when I re-imported the original rpool, but I'd already seen those before and wrote about them in another blog entry. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. Cheers, Mike Mike --- Michael Sullivan michael.p.sulli...@me.com Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2