-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I have configured two LUs following this guide:
http://thegreyblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/setting-up-solaris-comstar-and.html
Now I want each LU to be available to only one distinct client in the network.
I found no easy guide how to accomplish t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I have configured two LUs following this guide:
http://thegreyblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/setting-up-solaris-comstar-and.html
Now I want each LU to be available to only one distinct client in the network.
I found no easy guide how to accomplish t
Am 09.09.2010 um 07:00 schrieb zfs-discuss-requ...@opensolaris.org:
> What's the write workload like? You could try disabling the ZIL to see
> if that makes a difference. If it does, the addition of an SSD-based
> ZIL / slog device would most certainly help.
>
> Maybe you could describe the ma
Hi!
I searched the web for hours, trying to solve the NFS/ZFS low performance issue
on my just setup OSOL box (snv134). The problem is discussed in many threads
but I've found no solution.
On a nfs shared volume, I get write performance of 3,5M/sec (!!) read
performance is about 50M/sec which
Am 26.08.2010 um 04:38 schrieb Edward Ned Harvey:
> There is no such thing as reliable external disks. Not unless you want to
> pay $1000 each, which is dumb. You have to scrap your mini, and use
> internal (or hotswappable) disks.
>
> Never expect a mini to be reliable. They're designed to b
Hi!
I'm running a OSOL box for quite a while and I think ZFS is an amazing
filesystem. As a computer I use a Apple MacMini with USB and FireWire devices
attached. Unfortunately the USB and sometimes the FW devices just die, causing
the whole system to stall, forcing me to do a hard reboot.
I h
After about 62 hours and 90%, the resilvering process got stuck. Since 12 hours
nothing happens anymore. Thus, I can not detach the spare device. Is there a
way to get the resilvering process back running?
Martin
Am 18.08.2010 um 20:11 schrieb Mark Musante:
> You need to let the resilver com
Hi!
I had trouble with my raidz in the way, that some of the blockdevices where not
found by the OSOL Box the other day, so the spare device was hooked on
automatically.
After fixing the problem, the missing device came back online, but I am unable
to detach the spare device, even though all d
Am 08.02.2010 um 20:03 schrieb Richard Elling:
> Are you sure there is not another fault here? What does "svcs -xv" show?
Well, I don't have the result of svcs -xv, since the fault is recovered by now,
but it turned out not to be a hardware failure but an unstable USB-conectivity.
But sill: Wh
Hi!
I have a OSOL box as a home file server. It has 4 1TB USB Drives and 1 TB
FW-Drive attached. The USB devices are combined to a RaidZ-Pool and the FW
Drive acts as a hot spare.
This night, one USB drive faulted and the following happened:
1. The zpool was not accessible anymore
2. changing
Hi!
I wonder if the following scenario works:
I have a mac mini running as an OSOL box. The OS is installed on the internal
hard drive on the vdrive rpool. On rpool there is no redundancy.
If I add an external block device (USB / Firewire) to rpool to mirror the
internal hard drive and if the
Hi!
I tried to add an other FiweFire Drive to my existing four devices but it
turned out, that the OpenSolaris IEEE1394 support doen't seem to be
well-engineered.
After not recognizing the new device and exporting and importing the existing
zpool, I get this zpool status:
pool: tank
state:
Hi!
My OpenSolaris 2009.06 box runs into kernel panics almost every day. There are
4 FireWire drives, as a RaidZ pool attached to a MacMini. The panic seems to be
related to this known bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6835533
Since there are no known workarounds,
13 matches
Mail list logo
