On 25/01/2011, at 22.39, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 01/26/11 09:50 AM, Lasse Osterild wrote:
>> I'd go with some Dell MD1200's, for us they ended up being cheaper (incl
>> disks) than a SuperMicro case with the same model disks, and it's way nicer
>> t
On 25/01/2011, at 19.04, Philip Brown wrote:
> So, another hardware question :)
>
> ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the
> point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather
> than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays at it.
>
I've just noticed that Dell has a 6.0.1 firmware upgrade available, at least
for my R610's they do (they are about 3 months old). Oddly enough it doesn't
show up on support.dell.com when I search using my servicecode, but if I check
through "System Services / Lifecycle Controller" it does find
On 08/08/2010, at 07.23, valrh...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2. I'd also recommend avoiding the PERC cards, in particular since it makes
> drives attached to it impossible to transport to another system. Instead, I
> use the SAS 6i/R controller. That's built into the motherboard on the PW
> T7500, and
+1
I badly need this.
On 09/07/2010, at 19.40, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Anyone knows where in the pipeline BP rewrite is, or how long this pipeline
> is?
>
> You could move the data elsewhere using zfs send and recv, destroy the
> original datasets and then recreate them. This would str
Hi,
Have any of you looked at SSD's from Virident ?
http://virident.com/products.php
Looks pretty impressive to me, though I am sure the price is as well.
- Lasse
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/ma
On 09/02/2010, at 00.23, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:28:11PM +0100, Lasse Osterild wrote:
>> Ok thanks I know that the amount of used space will vary, but what's
>> the usefulness of the total size when ie in my pool above 4 x 1G
>> (roughly, de
On 08/02/2010, at 22.50, Richard Elling wrote:
>>
>> r...@vmstor01:/# zpool list
>> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
>> dataPool 9.94G 4.89G 5.04G49% 1.00x ONLINE -
>>
>> Now here's what I don't get, why does it say the poo sizel is 9.94G when
>> it's made
Hi,
This may well have been covered before but I've not been able to find an answer
to this particular question.
I've setup a raidz2 test env using files like this:
# mkfile 1g t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 t10 s1 s2
# zpool create dataPool raidz2 /xvm/t1 /xvm/t2 /xvm/t3 /xvm/t4 /xvm/t5
# zpool
Hi,
Seems either Solaris or SunSolve is in need of an update.
pool: dataPool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are
unaffected.
action: Determine if the device needs to be repla
10 matches
Mail list logo
