Well, there's the problem...
#id -a tom
uid=15669(tom) gid=15004(domain users) groups=15004(domain users)
#
wbinfo -r shows the full list of groups, but id -a only lists "domain users".
Since I'm trying to restrict permissions on other groups, my access denied
error message makes more sense.
Solaris 10u4 x64 using included Samba 3.0.28
Samba is AD integrated, and I have a share configured as follows:
[crlib1]
comment = Creative Lib1
path = /pool/creative/lib1
read only = No
vfs objects = zfsacl
acl
Pioneer Balloon is looking for someone to hire on an hourly basis to consult on
Solaris x86, ZFS, Samba, and Active Directory integration.
The ideal candidate would have a few years of hands-on experience with Samba in
a production environment using Active Directory, at least a few months of han
zfs list -o name,type,used,available,referenced,quota,compressratio
NAME TYPE USED AVAIL REFER QUOTA RATIO
pool/notes filesystem 151G 149G 53.2G 300G 1.25x
pool/[EMAIL PROTECTED]snapshot 48.1G - 57.7G - 1.27x
New tidbit of information...
I have a user account USER belonging to two groups GROUP1 and GROUP2. GROUP1
is the primary group.
If the ZFS folder is owned by ROOT:GROUP1, I can create the file through Samba.
If the folder is owned by ROOT:GROUP2, the create fails. This same problem
occurs w
I have a zfs filesystem exported via samba. I can connect to the filesystem
over CIFS from a Windows box, but I get an access denied when I try to create a
file. I can create the file just fine from the Solaris prompt as the same user
account. Does samba try to control permissions itself, or
The aclmode and aclinherit properties are exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks Mark!
Eric
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Here's a little test. I add an allow ACL to a new directory that should
propogate to sub-folders and files. When I create a new file, the file
inherits the ACL, but also gets a deny ACL in front of the allowed ACL. What's
going on here?
vault:/pool/home/wcerich/sample#ls -al
total 12
drwxr-x
Ok, now I'm getting somewhere.
vault:/#dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/dsk/c5t6d0 bs=512 count=64000
64000+0 records in
64000+0 records out
vault:/#dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/dsk/c5t6d0 bs=512 count=64000 oseek=976174591
64000+0 records in
64000+0 records out
vault:/#zpool replace pool c5t6d0
vault:/#
Looks
And to add more fuel to the fire, an fmdump -eV shows the following:
Jan 05 2007 11:30:38.030057310 ereport.fs.zfs.vdev.open_failed
nvlist version: 0
class = ereport.fs.zfs.vdev.open_failed
ena = 0x88c01b571200801
detector = (embedded nvlist)
nvlist version: 0
Hi Bill,
vault:/#zpool replace pool c5t6d0
invalid vdev specification
use '-f' to override the following errors:
/dev/dsk/c5t6d0s0 is part of active ZFS pool pool. Please see zpool(1M).
vault:/#zpool replace -f pool c5t6d0
invalid vdev specification
the following errors must be manually repaired:
I have a pool of 48 500GB disks across four SCSI channels (12 per channel).
One of the disks failed, and was replaced. The pool is now in a degraded
state, but I can't seem to get the pool to be happy with the replacement. I
did a resilver and the pool is error free with the exception of this
I really like that idea. That indeed would provide for both excellent
reliability (the ability to lose an entire shelf) and performance (stripe
across 6 rz2 pools). Thanks for the suggestion!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discus
We are implementing a ZFS storage server (NAS) to replace a NetApp box. I have
a Sun server with two dual Ultra320 PCIX cards connected to 4 shelves of 12
500GB disks each, yielding a total of 24TB of raw storage.
I'm kicking around the different ways to carve this space up, balancing storage
14 matches
Mail list logo
