ur setup as well and anything we
> might need to take into consideration (thinking best option for getting
> ZIL/L2ARC devices into Dell R510 head units for example in a supported
> manner).
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
> ___
> zfs-discuss
Try fmdump -e and then fmdump -eV, it could be a pathological disk just this
side of failure doing heavy retries that id dragging the pool down.
Craig
--
Craig Morgan
On 18 Dec 2011, at 16:23, Jan-Aage Frydenbø-Bruvoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 22:14, Nathan Kroene
;
> Otherwise, you need to use the "-t snapshot" list.
>
> But, a much better method of tracking this down is to use:
> zfs list -o space
>
> That will show the accounting for all dataset objects.
> -- richard
>
> _
fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate
>> og relevante synonymer på norsk.
>> ___
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
>
in /pci@0,0/pci8086,340c@5 even if other
>> controllers are active?
> _______
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
synonymer på norsk.
>> _______
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>>
>
> ___
> zfs-di
resh
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Craig Morgan
Cinnabar Solutions Ltd
t: +44 (0)791 33
ttp://groups.google.com/group/zfs-macos
-- richard
Any official word from Apple on the abandonment?
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Craig Morgan
Cinnabar Solutions Ltd
t:
t; Jan 27 03:27:40 unknown cpqary3: [ID 834734 kern.notice] Media
>> exchange
>> detected, logical drive 6
>> Jan 27 03:27:40 unknown cpqary3: [ID 10 kern.notice]
>> ...
>> Jan 27 03:36:24 unknown scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING:
>> /p..
#x27;s lamp?
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Craig
Cra
ching either online or in the forums. Any
> assistance would be greatly received, thanks :)
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.o
olaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Craig
Craig Morgan
t: +44 (0)791 338 3190
f: +44 (0)870 705 1726
e: craig.mor...@sun.com
~
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of
bassadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What Veritas is saying vs ZFS
Thought it might behoove us all to see this presentation from the
Veritas conference last week, and understand what they are saying
vs ZFS
and our storage plans.
Some interesting performance claims to say t
This is probably an attempt to 'short-stroke' a larger disk with the
intention utilising only a small ammount of the disk surface, as a
technique it used to be quite common for certain apps (notably DBs).
Hence you saw deployments of quite large disks but with perhaps only
1/4-1/2 physical
Given your description of the physical installation, I'd initially
suspect that you have a poorly SCSI bus before proceeding. What is
the bus type and what length are the cables?
If you've got 7 devices and hence 7 individual enclosures, with
associated wiring between them, you may have exc
If you take a look at these messages the somewhat unusual condition
that may lead to unexpected behaviour (ie. fast giveup) is that
whilst this is a SAN connection it is achieved through a non-
Leadville config, note the fibre-channel and sd references. In a
Leadville compliant installation
RFE #6276912 "zfs config"
--matt
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Craig Morgan
Cinnabar Solutions Ltd
t: +44 (0)791 338 3190
f: +44 (0)870 705 1726
e: [E
17 matches
Mail list logo