Re: [zfs-discuss] GUI to set ACLs

On 31 Jan 2012, at 12:20, Achim Wolpers wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm searching for a GUI tool to set ZFS (NFSv4) ACLs. I found some nautilus > add ons in the web but they don't seen to work with nautilus shipped with OI. > Any solution? Does Windows count? Windows can certainly edit ZFS ACLs when

Re: [zfs-discuss] Apple's ZFS-alike - Re: Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot? If yes - how?

On 16 Jan 2012, at 16:56, Rich Teer wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Freddie Cash wrote: > >>> There would likely be a market if someone was to sell pre-packaged zfs for >>> Apple OS-X at a much higher price than the operating system itself. > > 10's Complement (?) are planning such a thing, altho

Re: [zfs-discuss] SATA hardware advice

On 17 Dec 2011, at 19:35, Edmund White wrote: > On 12/17/11 8:27 PM, "Chris Ridd" wrote: > > >> >> Can you explain how you got the SSDs into the HP sleds? Did you buy blank >> sleds from somewhere, or cannibalise some "cheap" HP drives? >

Re: [zfs-discuss] SATA hardware advice

On 16 Dec 2011, at 23:48, Edmund White wrote: > If you're building from scratch, please choose nearline/midline SAS disks > instead of SATA if you're looking for capacity. For detailed reasoning, > see: http://serverfault.com/a/331504/13325 > > For the server, I've had great success with HP ProL

Re: [zfs-discuss] is there an inmemory map of all files in a zfs filesystem, or how can I get it ?

On 31 Aug 2011, at 09:36, spambuf...@orcon.net.nz wrote: > I really want something like the MFT in NTFS, which has an easily accessible > list of everything on the filesystem. > > I want easy access to the realtime events happening in the filesystem. ZFS supports virus scanners via the "ICAP"

Re: [zfs-discuss] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Question about ZFS/CIFS

On 12 Aug 2011, at 21:47, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > Hi all > > We've migrated from an old samba installation to a new box with openindiana, > and it works well, but... It seems Windows now honours the executable bit, so > that .exe files for installing packages, are no longer directly exec

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replacing failed drive

On 22 Jul 2011, at 21:29, Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC wrote: > It's resilvering now - thanks for the help! I think the command you were trying to recall was prtvtoc. Chris ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensol

Re: [zfs-discuss] 700GB gone? "zfs list" and "df" differs!

On 4 Jul 2011, at 12:58, Orvar Korvar wrote: > PS. I do not have any snapshots: > > root@frasse:~# zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > TempStorage916G 45,1G 37,3G > /mnt/TempStorage > TempStorage/Backup

Re: [zfs-discuss] Mapping sas address to physical disk in enclosure

On 19 May 2011, at 14:44, Evaldas Auryla wrote: > Hi Chris, there is no sestopo on this box (Solaris Express 11 151a), fmtopo > -dV works nice, although it's a bit "overkill" with manually parsing the > output :) You need to install pkg:/system/io/tests. Chris

Re: [zfs-discuss] Mapping sas address to physical disk in enclosure

On 19 May 2011, at 08:55, Evaldas Auryla wrote: > Hi, we have SunFire X4140 connected to Dell MD1220 SAS enclosure, single > path, MPxIO disabled, via LSI SAS9200-8e HBA. Disks are visible with > sas-addresses such as this in "zpool status" output: > >NAME STATE

Re: [zfs-discuss] GPU acceleration of ZFS

On 10 May 2011, at 16:44, Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) Ph. D. wrote: > > IMHO, zfs need to run in all kind of HW > T-series CMT server that can help sha calculation since T1 day, did not see > any work in ZFS to take advantage it That support would be in the crypto framework though, not ZFS per s

Re: [zfs-discuss] Drive id confusion

On 6 Feb 2011, at 03:14, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > I'm thinking either Solaris' appalling mess of device files is somehow scrod, > or else ZFS is confused in its reporting (perhaps because of cache file > contents?). Is there anything I can do about either of these? Does devfsadm > really c

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs + charset

On 15 Jan 2011, at 13:57, Achim Wolpers wrote: > Am 15.01.11 14:52, schrieb Chris Ridd: >> What are the normalization properties of these filesystems? The zfs man page >> says they're used when comparing filenames: > The normalization properties are set to none. Is this t

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs + charset

On 15 Jan 2011, at 13:44, Achim Wolpers wrote: > Hi! > > I have a problem with the charset in the following scenario: > > - OSOL Server with zfs pool und NFS/CIFS shares enabled > - OSX Client with CIFS mounts > - OSX Client with NFSv3 mounts > > If one of the clients saves a file with a speci

Re: [zfs-discuss] What are .$EXTEND directories?

On 3 Jan 2011, at 17:08, Volker A. Brandt wrote: >> On our build 147 server (pool version 22) I've noticed that some directories >> called ".$EXTEND" (no quotes) are appearing underneath some shared NFS >> filesystems, containing an empty file called "$QUOTA". We aren't using >> quotas. >> >>

[zfs-discuss] What are .$EXTEND directories?

On our build 147 server (pool version 22) I've noticed that some directories called ".$EXTEND" (no quotes) are appearing underneath some shared NFS filesystems, containing an empty file called "$QUOTA". We aren't using quotas. What are these ? Googling for the names doesn't really work too well

Re: [zfs-discuss] Mac OS X clients with ZFS server

On 26 Apr 2010, at 06:02, Dave Pooser wrote: > On 4/25/10 6:07 PM, "Rich Teer" wrote: > >> Sounds fair enough! Let's move this to email; meanwhile, what's the >> packet sniffing incantation I need to use? On Solaris I'd use snoop, >> but I don't htink Mac OS comes with that! > > Use Wireshar

Re: [zfs-discuss] Sun Flash Accelerator F20 numbers

On 31 Mar 2010, at 17:50, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Chris Ridd wrote: > >>> Yesterday I noticed that the Sun Studio 12 compiler (used to build >>> OpenSolaris) now costs a minimum of $1,015/year. The "Premium" service >>> plan

Re: [zfs-discuss] Sun Flash Accelerator F20 numbers

On 31 Mar 2010, at 17:23, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > Yesterday I noticed that the Sun Studio 12 compiler (used to build > OpenSolaris) now costs a minimum of $1,015/year. The "Premium" service plan > costs $200 more. The download still seems to be a "free, full-license copy" for SDN members; the

Re: [zfs-discuss] " . . formatted using older on-disk format . ."

On 11 Mar 2010, at 04:17, Erik Trimble wrote: > Matt Cowger wrote: >> On Mar 10, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Ian Collins wrote: >> >> >>> Yes, noting the warning. >> >> Is it safe to execute on a live, active pool? >> >> --m >> > Yes. No reboot necessary. > > The Warning only applies to this

Re: [zfs-discuss] future of OpenSolaris

On 25 Feb 2010, at 14:28, Sean Sprague wrote: > Bob, > >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> >>> and what uname -s reports. >> >> It will surely report "OrkOS". > > For OpenSolaris, "OracOS" - surely there must be Blakes 7 fans in Oracle > Corp.? You can see all the working bit

Re: [zfs-discuss] snv_133 - high cpu

On 23 Feb 2010, at 19:53, Bruno Sousa wrote: > The system becames really slow during the data copy using network, but i copy > data between 2 pools of the box i don't notice that issue, so probably i may > be hitting some sort of interrupt conflit in the network cards...This system > is config

Re: [zfs-discuss] etc on separate pool

On 22 Jan 2010, at 08:55, Alexander wrote: > Is it possible to have /etc on separate zfs pool in OpenSolaris? > The purpose is to have rw non-persistent main pool and rw persistent /etc... > I've tried to make legacy etcpool/etc file system and mount it in > /etc/vfstab... > Is it possible to

Re: [zfs-discuss] link in zpool upgrade -v broken

On 7 Jan 2010, at 23:52, Ian Collins wrote: > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/ > > No longer exists. Is there a bug for this yet? I don't think so. But is where they've moved to. Cheers, Chris __

Re: [zfs-discuss] solaris 10U7

On 13 Dec 2009, at 09:05, dick hoogendijk wrote: > I just noticed that my zpool is still running v10 and my zfs filesystems > are on v3. This is on solaris 10U3. Before upgrading the zpool and ZFS > versions I'd like to know the supported versions by solaris 10 update.7 > I'd rather not make my z

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zpool problems

On 6 Dec 2009, at 16:14, Michael Armstrong wrote: > Hi, I'm using zfs version 6 on mac os x 10.5 using the old macosforge pkg. > When I'm writing files to the fs they are appearing as 1kb files and if I do > zpool status or scrub or anything the command is just hanging. However I can > still r

Re: [zfs-discuss] Can't rm file when "No space left on device"...

On 1 Oct 2009, at 19:34, Andrew Gabriel wrote: Pick a file which isn't in a snapshot (either because it's been created since the most recent snapshot, or because it's been rewritten since the most recent snapshot so it's no longer sharing blocks with the snapshot version). Out of curiosi

Re: [zfs-discuss] Checksum property change does not change pre-existing data - right?

On 24 Sep 2009, at 03:09, Mark J Musante wrote: On 23 Sep, 2009, at 21.54, Ray Clark wrote: My understanding is that if I "zfs set checksum=" to change the algorithm that this will change the checksum algorithm for all FUTURE data blocks written, but does not in any way change the check

Re: [zfs-discuss] Real help

On 20 Sep 2009, at 19:46, dick hoogendijk wrote: On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 11:41 -0700, vattini giacomo wrote: Hi there,i'm in a bad situation,under Ubuntu i was tring to import a solaris zpool that is in /dev/sda1,while the Ubuntu is in /dev/ sda5;not being able to mount the solaris pool i dec

Re: [zfs-discuss] Space has not been freed up!

On 10 Sep 2009, at 09:38, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Gino wrote: # cd /dr/netapp11bkpVOL34 # rm -r * # ls -la # Now there are no files in /dr/netapp11bkpVOL34, but # zfs list|egrep netapp11bkpVOL34 dr/netapp11bkpVOL34 1.34T 158G

Re: [zfs-discuss] Failure of Quicktime *.mov files after move to zfs disk

On 21 Aug 2009, at 22:35, Scott Laird wrote: Checksum all of the files using something like md5sum and see if they're actually identical. Then test each step of the copy and see which one is corrupting your files. It might be worth checking if they've got funny Unicode chars in the names.

Re: [zfs-discuss] filesystem notification / query

On 20 Aug 2009, at 21:22, Felix Nielsen wrote: Hi Is it possible to get filesystem notification like when files are created, modified, deleted? or can the "activity" be exported? If you have a vscan service then that will get notified when files are accessed or modified; would that be su

Re: [zfs-discuss] Another user looses his pool (10TB) in this case and 40 days work

On 27 Jul 2009, at 18:49, Thomas Burgess wrote: i was under the impression it was virtualbox and it's default setting that ignored the command, not the hard drive Do other virtualization products (eg VMware, Parallels, Virtual PC) have the same default behaviour as VirtualBox? I've a s

Re: [zfs-discuss] Apple Removes Nearly All Reference To ZFS

On 11 Jun 2009, at 10:52, Paul van der Zwan wrote: On 11 jun 2009, at 11:48, Sami Ketola wrote: On 11 Jun 2009, at 12:44, Paul van der Zwan wrote: Strange thing I noticed in the keynote is that they claim the disk usage of Snow Leopard is 6 GB less than Leopard mostly because of compre

Re: [zfs-discuss] GSoC 09 zfs ideas?

On 28 Feb 2009, at 07:26, C. Bergström wrote: Blake wrote: Gnome GUI for desktop ZFS administration With the libzfs java bindings I am plotting a web based interface.. I'm not sure if that would meet this gnome requirement though.. Knowing specifically what you'd want to do in that inter

Re: [zfs-discuss] Does your device honor write barriers?

On 10 Feb 2009, at 18:35, Bryant Eadon wrote: Given that ZFS is planned to be used in Snow Leopard, is it worth setting something up for consumer grade appliance vendors to 'certify' against? ("Ok, you play nice with ZFS by doing the right things", etc.. ) Maybe you can give them a 'Gold

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs send -R slow

On 28 Jan 2009, at 19:40, BJ Quinn wrote: >>> What about when I pop in the drive to be resilvered, but right >>> before I add it back to the mirror, will Solaris get upset that I >>> have two drives both with the same pool name? >> No, you have to do a manual import. > > What you mean is that

Re: [zfs-discuss] freeze/ thaw zfs file system

On 27 Jan 2009, at 17:59, Richard Elling wrote: > ajit jain wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> I am writing a filtering device which tracks the write to the >> file-system. I am doing it for ufs, vxfs and for zfs. Sometime for >> consistent point I need to freeze the file-system which flushes dirty >> bl

Re: [zfs-discuss] SDXC and the future of ZFS

On 14 Jan 2009, at 10:01, Andrew Gabriel wrote: > DOS/FAT filesystem implementations in appliances can be found in less > than 8K code and data size (mostly that's code). Limited functionality > implementations can be smaller than 1kB size. Just for the sake of comparison, how big is the limited

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS import on pool with same name?

On 5 Jan 2009, at 17:59, Josh Rivel wrote: > How can I import the rpool from the 2nd hard drive and have it mount > on > a different partition or something so I can recover the data from it? You rename it as you import it, eg: zpool import 6530745808930953819 newname Cheers, Chris _

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hybrid Pools - Since when?

On 14 Dec 2008, at 16:58, Andrew Gabriel wrote: > Rafael Friedlander wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does anyone know since when hybrid pools are available in ZFS? Are >> there >> ZFS "versions"? >> >> XVM Server is based on Nevada b93, and I need to know if it supports >> hybrid pools. >> > > Hybrid pool

Re: [zfs-discuss] Slow death-spiral with zfs gzip-9 compression

On 30 Nov 2008, at 02:59, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Ian Collins wrote: > >> What did you expect? A 3GHz Opteron core takes about a minutes to >> attempt to compress a 1GB .mkv file. So your P3 would probably take >> between 5 and 10 minutes. Now move that to the kernel and

Re: [zfs-discuss] Problem importing degraded Pool

On 29 Nov 2008, at 09:35, Philipp Haußleiter wrote: > Hello... > > i have somehow a strange problem. > I build a normal zfs pool of two disks (jbod) and set some folders > to copies=2 Mirrored disks? > Yesterday one of the disks failed and so the zpool status changed to: > >> pool: tank >> st

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for swap and root pool

On 28 Nov 2008, at 00:07, Peter Brouwer, Principal Storage Architect wrote: > > > dick hoogendijk wrote: >> >> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:58:20 + >> Chris Ridd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I'm not 100% convinced it'll

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for swap and root pool

On 26 Nov 2008, at 17:08, Chris Ridd wrote: > It feels a lot like "don't start from here" (ie from my 2008.05 > install) so I'm doing an install of 101b from CD onto one of the new > disks right now. At least format's not showing a swap slice now, >

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for swap and root pool

On 26 Nov 2008, at 14:37, Darren J Moffat wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:51:04 + >> Chris Ridd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> But what do I do with that swap slice? Should I ditch it and create >>> an rpool/swap area? Do I s

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for swap and root pool

On 26 Nov 2008, at 13:12, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:51:04 + > Chris Ridd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm replacing the disk with my rpool with a mirrored pool, and >> wondering how best to do that. >> >> The disk I'm

[zfs-discuss] Best practice for swap and root pool

I'm replacing the disk with my rpool with a mirrored pool, and wondering how best to do that. The disk I'm replacing is partitioned with root on s0, swap on s1 and boot on s8, which is what the original 2008.05 installer created for me. I've partitioned the new disk in the same way and am no

[zfs-discuss] Odd filename in zpool status -v output

My non-redundant rpool (2 replacement disks have been ordered :-) is reporting errors: canopus% pfexec zpool status -v rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore t

Re: [zfs-discuss] Downgrading a zpool

On 6 Nov 2008, at 10:19, Christian Vallo wrote: > Hi Chris, > > i think there is no way to downgrade. I think you must copy/sync the > data from one pool (v4) to another pool (v3). Darn. I've managed to push back on doing the downgrade for now anyway... Cheers, Chris

Re: [zfs-discuss] Downgrading a zpool

On 6 Nov 2008, at 09:53, Ian Collins wrote: > Chris Ridd wrote: >> I probably need to downgrade a machine from 10u5 to 10u3. The zpool >> on >> u5 is a v4 pool, and AIUI 10u3 only supports up to v3 pools. >> >> Will this pool automatically import when I downgra

[zfs-discuss] Downgrading a zpool

I probably need to downgrade a machine from 10u5 to 10u3. The zpool on u5 is a v4 pool, and AIUI 10u3 only supports up to v3 pools. Will this pool automatically import when I downgrade the OS? Assuming I'm not that lucky, can I use 10u5's zfs send to take a backup of the filesystems, and zfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] Using zfs boot with MPxIO on T2000

Adrian Danielson wrote: > 1. After the install I created a zfs mirror of the root disk c0t0d0 to > c0t1d0, format shows the mirrored disk with sectors instead of cylinders, is > this normal or correct? Is there a way to reverse this back to cylinders if > it is not? Same goes for the external

Re: [zfs-discuss] Remove old boot environment?

Ted Carr wrote: > Hello All, > > Is there a way I can remove my old boot environments? Is it as simple as > performing a 'zfs destroy' on the older entries, followed by removing the > entry from the menu.lst?? I have been searching, but have not found > anything... Any help would be much app

Re: [zfs-discuss] OT: extremely poor experience with Sun Download Manager

On 14/6/07 11:16, "Graham Perrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Intending to experiment with ZFS, I have been struggling with what > should be a simple download routine. > > Sun Download Manager leaves a great deal to be desired. > > In the Online Help for Sun Download Manager there's a section o

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: zfs reports small st_size for directories?

On 10/6/07 5:23, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 9/6/07 10:01, "Eric Schrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 01:56:35PM -0700, Ed Ravin wrote: I encountered the problem in NetBSD's scandir(), when reading off a Solaris NFS fileser

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: zfs reports small st_size for directories?

On 9/6/07 10:01, "Eric Schrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 01:56:35PM -0700, Ed Ravin wrote: >> >> I encountered the problem in NetBSD's scandir(), when reading off >> a Solaris NFS fileserver with ZFS filesystems. I've already filed a >> bug report with NetBSD. They w

Re: [zfs-discuss] Google paper on disk reliability

On 18/2/07 4:56, "Akhilesh Mritunjai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks > > I believe that the word would have gone around already, Google engineers have > published a paper on disk reliability. It might supplement the ZFS FMA > integration and well - all the numerous debates on spares etc et

Re: [zfs-discuss] RACF: SunFire x4500 Thumper Evaluation

On 11/2/07 3:04, "Ian Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rayson Ho wrote: > >> Interesting... >> >> http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper-eval.pdf >> >> > I wonder where they got the information that "Solaris 10 doesn't support > dual-core Intel" from? Does Open

Re: [zfs-discuss] can I use zfs on just a partition?

On 25/1/07 3:16, "Jeremy Teo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/25/07, Tim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just want to verify, if I have say, 1 160GB disk, can I format it so that the >> first say 40GB is my main UFS parition with the base OS install, and then >> make the rest of the disk zfs?

Re: [zfs-discuss] Thumper Origins Q

On 24/1/07 9:06, "Bryan Cantrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But Fowler said the name was too risque (!). Fortunately the name > "Thumper" stuck... I assumed it was a reference to Bambi... That's what comes from having small children :-) Cheers, Chris __