On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:41 AM, vattini giacomo wrote:
> sudo zpool destroy hazz0
> sudo reboot
> Now opensolaris is not booting everything is vanished
ROFL
This actually has to go to the daily WTF... :-)
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
__
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
> I am talking about the process, not the announcement.
What's wrong with process?
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
z
Hi, Miles!
Hope, weather is fine at your place. :-)
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Miles Nordin wrote:
> I understood Bogdan's post was a trap: ``provide bug numbers. Oh,
> they're fixed? nothing to see here then. no bugs? nothing to see
> here then.''
Would be great if you do not put a wor
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> I can't say as to the entire Atom line of stuff, but I've found the Atoms
> are OK for desktop use, and not anywhere powerful enough for even a basic
> NAS server. The demands of wire-speed Gigabit, ZFS, and
> encryption/compression are hard
2009/6/18 Timh Bergström :
> USB-sticks has proven a bad idea with zfs mirrors
I think, USB sticks is bad idea for mirrors in general... :-)
> ZFS on iSCSI *is* flaky
OK, so what is the status of your bugreport about this? Was ignored or
just rejected?..
> Flaming people on ./
Nobody flaming peop
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Miles Nordin wrote:
> Surely you can understand there is such thing as a ``hard to reproduce
> problem?'' Is the phrase so new to you? If you'd experience with
> other filesystems in their corruption-prone infancy, it wouldn't be.
I understand your point, but I d
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> Ok, so you mean the comments are mostly FUD and bull shit?
Unless there is real step-by-step reproducible proof, then yes, it is
completely useless waste of time and BS that I would not care at all,
if I were you.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Brad Reese wrote:
> Yes, you may access the system via ssh. Please contact me at bar001 at uark
> dot
> edu and I will reply with details of how to connect.
...and then please tell us what was wrong! :-)
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the begin
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Miles Nordin wrote:
> What have you done to try to reproduce the problem?
P.S. I've read that Slashdot article and all the comments and even
replied some. Plus, I've actually tried to reproduce few things that
they vaguely are able to describe. No failures so far.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Miles Nordin wrote:
> What have you done to try to reproduce the problem?
Well, if you had posted here steps that fails for you and I missed
this, then I am sorry, I would like to get this somewhere from archive
and try.
However, please don't get me wrong: no ad h
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Neal Pollack wrote:
> Not sure I understand all this concern. 32 bit can use 1.0 TB disks as data
> drives. ZFS can use more than 1 disk. So if you hook up 48 of the 1.0 TB
> disks
> using ZFS on a 32 bit system, where is the problem?
+1.
Even if someone needs
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> According to this webpage, there are some errors that makes ZFS unusable
> under certain conditions.
> That is not really optimal for an Enterprise file system. In my opinion the
> ZFS team should focus
> on bug correction instead of adding n
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Andre Lue wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> I'd recommend the following RAM minimums for a fair balance of performance.
> 700Mb 32-bit
> 1Gb 64-bit
OK, it probably means 2GB when it goes actually practical. :-) Thanks!
--
Kind regards, bm
__
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Andre Lue wrote:
> Feel free to give EON a twirl. It will only cost you CD and the time to burn
> and boot it. Or if you have a VM you can test it there. You'll know reallly
> fast if it has enough of a framework for you to add the missing bits you need
> or not.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote:
> One example is StormOS, and XFCE based distro being built on NCP2.
> According to the latest blog entry.. a release is imminent. Perhaps
> you'll have better desktop experience with this. (www.stormos.org)
So.Tried it just now. Shortly: I'd s
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote:
> Yes, NCP's Desktop side components (X/Gnome/XFCE) is untested, and
> explains the issues. The focus is on the core.. and it has been so
> since the move from Gnusolaris (the older Gnome based Nexenta) to
> Nexenta Core platform. The idea was a
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> Which particular packages were these? RC3 is quite stable, and all
> server packages are solid. If you do face issues with a particular
> one, we'd appreciate a bug report. All information on this is
> helpful..
Well, I don't r
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Joe S wrote:
> EON ZFS NAS
> http://eonstorage.blogspot.com/
No idea.
> NexentaCore Platform (v2.0 RC3)
> http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaCore
Personally, I tried it few times. For now, it is still too much broken
for me yet and looks scary. Previous version is
Hello, folks.
kind of problem with mirrors and raidz.
System & config:
— SunOS 5.11, snv_111a
— Service system/filesystem/rmvolmgr is disabled.
Hardware:
— Asus EeePC Box B202
— Two USB 3.5" inches boxes.
If I reboot: mirror or raidz works fine. But if I connect physical USB
cables in different
19 matches
Mail list logo
