On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Orvar Korvar<no-re...@opensolaris.org> wrote: > According to this webpage, there are some errors that makes ZFS unusable > under certain conditions. > That is not really optimal for an Enterprise file system. In my opinion the > ZFS team should focus > on bug correction instead of adding new functionality. The functionality that > exists far surpass > any other file system, therefore it is better to fix bugs. In my opinion. > Read those error reports > and complaints and data corruption: > http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/06/09/2336223/Apple-Removes-Nearly-All-Reference-To-ZFS
Slashdot? 'cmon, Orvar... You've found the resource reference to, LOL. Try to say in Slashdot something really reasonable, like that GNOME (GUI No One Might Enjoy) actually sucks in its integration and is still horrible on small resolutions (e.g. you get OK/Cancel off the screen on a netbooks) and you will be an enemy of the whole world. And if you say that the latest KDE (Kids Desktop Environment) is actually even more terrible than Windows 95 — you're just simply dead. :-) Personally, I tried to get scared on ZFS, but all the time when yet another slashdotter (read: teenager) screams about dramatical data loss, I am unable to reproduce the problem. Thus I think it would be much better to the community if we actually find a real step-by-step reproducible crashes (VirtualBox is our friend here), fill a real bug reports and then it would be much more reasonable to speak about a particular case, rather then spreading out stupid FUD, taken from a useless slashdot commenters. P.S. I mean, let's don't waste our time on slashdot and let's find something actually bad, reproduce, fill a bug and then report here. :-) -- Kind regards, bm _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
