Re: [zfs-discuss] [networking-discuss] Help needed on big transfers failure with e1000g

lication stream more frequently, so as long as zfs-auto-snap doesn't remove intermediate snaps before the script can send them, this is kind of solved it for me, but still, there might be a problem somewhere that others might encounter. Just thought I should report it. - Arnaud Le 09/02/2010

Re: [zfs-discuss] Install/boot OS from ZFS iscsi target

Short answer : yes. You'll find more info regarding COMSTAR (the iscsi target in opensolaris) here http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+comstar/ For the windows part : http://etherboot.org/wiki/sanboot and here http://etherboot.org/wiki/sanboot/iscsi_install -- arnaud Le 08/02/2010 22

Re: [zfs-discuss] Cores vs. Speed?

Le 05/02/10 01:00, Brian a écrit : Thanks for the reply. Are cores better because of the compression/deduplication being mult-threaded or because of multiple streams? It is a pretty big difference in clock speed - so curious as to why core would be better. Glad to see your 4 core system i

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best 1.5TB drives for consumer RAID?

Le 04/02/10 20:26, Tonmaus a écrit : Hi again, thanks for the answer. Another thing that came to my mind is that you mentioned that you mixed the disks among the controllers. Does that mean you mixed them as well among pools? Unsurprisingly, the WD20EADS is slower than the Hitachi that is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best 1.5TB drives for consumer RAID?

Le 04/02/10 16:57, Tonmaus a écrit : Hi Arnaud, which type of controller is this? Regards, Tonmaus I use two LSI SAS3081E-R in each server (16 hard disk trays, passive backplane AFAICT, no expander). Works very well. Arnaud ___ zfs-discuss mai

Re: [zfs-discuss] Help needed with zfs send/receive

Le 03/02/2010 09:25, Arnaud Brand a écrit : Le 03/02/2010 04:44, Brent Jones a écrit : On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Brent Jones wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Arnaud Brand wrote: Hi folks, I'm having (as the title suggests) a problem with zfs send/receive. Command line is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best 1.5TB drives for consumer RAID?

Le 02/02/2010 20:26, Marc Nicholas a écrit : On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Brandon High > wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Simon Breden mailto:sbre...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Which consumer-priced 1.5TB drives do people currently recommend? I happened

Re: [zfs-discuss] Help needed with zfs send/receive

Le 03/02/2010 04:44, Brent Jones a écrit : On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Brent Jones wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Arnaud Brand wrote: Hi folks, I'm having (as the title suggests) a problem with zfs send/receive. Command line is like this : pfexec zfs send -Rp t

Re: [zfs-discuss] Help needed with zfs send/receive

Le 02/02/10 22:49, Tim Cook a écrit : On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@gmail.com> wrote: On Feb 2, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Arnaud Brand wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm having (as the title suggests) a problem with zfs send/receive. > Co

[zfs-discuss] Help needed with zfs send/receive

Hi folks, I'm having (as the title suggests) a problem with zfs send/receive. Command line is like this : pfexec zfs send -Rp tank/t...@snapshot | ssh remotehost pfexec zfs recv -v -F -d tank This works like a charm as long as the snapshot is small enough. When it gets too big (meaning somew

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs over iscsi bad status

Just for the record, using 127.0.0.1 as the target instead of localhost's external IP, the problem didn't show up anymore. Le 16/01/10 15:55, Arnaud Brand a écrit : OK, the third question (localhost transmission failure) should have been posted to storage-discuss. I'll subscri

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs over iscsi bad status

5(ffd19553, 809cb08, 2102, 0) ff001791eec0 open64+0x34(809cb08, 101, 0) ff001791ef10 _sys_sysenter_post_swapgs+0x149() -Message d'origine- De : Arnaud Brand Envoyé : samedi 16 janvier 2010 01:54 À : zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Objet : Zfs over iscsi bad status I wa

[zfs-discuss] Zfs over iscsi bad status

I was testing zfs over iscsi (with commstar over a zvol) and got some errors. Target and initiator are on the same host. I've copy-pasted an excerpt on zpool status hereafter. The pool (tank) containing the iscsi-shared zvol (tank/tsmvol) is healthy and show no errors. But the zpool (tsmvol) on t

Re: [zfs-discuss] Is LSI SAS3081E-R suitable for a ZFS NAS ?

-- De : james.mcpher...@sun.com [mailto:james.mcpher...@sun.com] De la part de James C. McPherson Envoyé : lundi 11 janvier 2010 23:05 À : Arnaud Brand Cc : zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Objet : Re: [zfs-discuss] Is LSI SAS3081E-R suitable for a ZFS NAS ? On 11/01/10 11:57 PM, Arnaud Brand wrote: > > A

Re: [zfs-discuss] opensolaris-vmware

Your machines won't come up running, they'll start up from scratch (like if you had hit the reset button). If you want your machines to come up you have to make vmware snapshots, which capture the state of the running VM (memory, etc..). Typically this is automated with solutions like VCB (Vmwa

[zfs-discuss] Is LSI SAS3081E-R suitable for a ZFS NAS ?

According to various posts the LSI SAS3081E-R seems to work well with OpenSolaris. But I've got pretty chilled-out from my recent problems with Areca-1680's. Could anyone please confirm that the LSI SAS3081E-R works well ? Is hotplug supported ? Anything else I should know before buying one of

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs, raidz, spare and jbod

We had a similar problem on Areca 1680. It was caused by a drive that didn't properly reset (took ~2 seconds each time according to the drive tray's led). Replacing the drive solved this problem, but then we hit another problem which you can see in this thread : http://opensolaris.org/jive/thre

[zfs-discuss] ZFS partially hangs when removing an rpool mirrored disk while having some IO on another pool on another partition of the same disk

n, on other information I should publish, on other things to run or to check, I'll be happy to test them. If I can be of any help to help troubleshoot the zfs hang problems that other are experiencing, I'd be happy to give a hand. Thanks and have a nice day, Regar