Re: [zfs-discuss] partioned cache devices

2013-03-18 Thread Ian Collins
Andrew Werchowiecki wrote: Thanks for the info about slices, I may give that a go later on. I’m not keen on that because I have clear evidence (as in zpools set up this way, right now, working, without issue) that GPT partitions of the style shown above work and I want to see why it doesn’t w

Re: [zfs-discuss] partioned cache devices

2013-03-18 Thread Andrew Werchowiecki
I did something like the following: format -e /dev/rdsk/c5t0d0p0 fdisk 1 (create) F (EFI) 6 (exit) partition label 1 y 0 usr wm 64 4194367e 1 usr wm 4194368 117214990 label 1 y Total disk size is 9345 cylinders Cylinder size is 12544 (512 byte) blocks

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs-discuss Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12

2013-03-18 Thread Kristoffer Sheather @ CloudCentral
You could always use 40-gigabit between the two storage systems which would speed things dramatically, or back to back 56-gigabit IB. From: zfs-discuss-requ...@opensolaris.org Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:01 PM To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: