Re: [zfs-discuss] Metadata (DDT) Cache Bias

2011-06-05 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:26:20PM -0500, Tim Cook wrote: > I'd go with the option of allowing both a weighted and a forced option. I > agree though, if you do primarycache=metadata, the system should still > attempt to cache userdata if there is additional space remaining. I think I disagree. R

Re: [zfs-discuss] Metadata (DDT) Cache Bias

2011-06-05 Thread Tim Cook
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Edward Ned Harvey < opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com> wrote: > > From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 9:10 PM > > > Instant Poll : Yes/No ? > > > > No. > > > > Methinks the MRU/MFU balance algorit

Re: [zfs-discuss] SE11 express Encryption on - > errors in the pool after Scrub

2011-06-05 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Hobbes > > I am testing Solaris Express 11 with napp-it on two machines. In both > cases the same problem: Enabling encryption on a folder, filling it with > data will result in errors i

Re: [zfs-discuss] Metadata (DDT) Cache Bias

2011-06-05 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 9:10 PM > > Instant Poll : Yes/No ? > > No. > > Methinks the MRU/MFU balance algorithm adjustment is more fruitful. Operating under the assumption that cache hits can be predicted, I agree with RE. However,

[zfs-discuss] SE11 express Encryption on - > errors in the pool after Scrub

2011-06-05 Thread Thomas Hobbes
Hi, I am testing Solaris Express 11 with napp-it on two machines. In both cases the same problem: Enabling encryption on a folder, filling it with data will result in errors indicated by a subsequent scrub. I did not find the topic on the web, but also not experiences shared by people using e

Re: [zfs-discuss] compare snapshot to current zfs fs

2011-06-05 Thread Matthew Ahrens
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > But I also see a massive list of files with a letter `m' prefixed on > each line, Which is supposed to mean modified, They cannot all really > be modified so I'm thinking its something to do with rsyncing files > from a windows XP machine to

Re: [zfs-discuss] compare snapshot to current zfs fs

2011-06-05 Thread Eric Sproul
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > Apparently my OS is new enough (b 147 )... since the command > is known.  Very nice...  but where is the documentation? > > `man zfs' has no hits on a grep for diff (except different..) > > Ahh never mind... I found: >  http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/