On 3/20/2011 2:23 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Mar 20, 2011, at 12:48 PM, David Magda wrote:
On Mar 20, 2011, at 14:24, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
It all depends on the number of drives in the VDEV(s), traffic
patterns during resilver, speed VDEV fill, of drives etc. Still,
close to 6 days is
On 03/21/11 12:20 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Mar 20, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 03/20/11 08:57 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Has anyone seen a resilver longer than this for a 500G drive in a riadz2 vdev?
scrub: resilver completed after 169h25m with 0 errors on Sun Mar 20 19:57:37
20
On Mar 20, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 03/20/11 08:57 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
>> Has anyone seen a resilver longer than this for a 500G drive in a riadz2
>> vdev?
>>
>> scrub: resilver completed after 169h25m with 0 errors on Sun Mar 20 19:57:37
>> 2011
>> c0t0d0 ONLI
On Mar 20, 2011, at 18:02, Ian Collins wrote:
> I didn't intend to start an argument, I was just very surprised the resilver
> took so long.
ZFS is a relatively young file system, and it does a lot of things differently
than what has been done in the past. Personally I think arguments / debates
On 03/20/11 08:57 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Has anyone seen a resilver longer than this for a 500G drive in a
riadz2 vdev?
scrub: resilver completed after 169h25m with 0 errors on Sun Mar 20
19:57:37 2011
c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 769G resilvered
I didn't intend to sta
On Mar 20, 2011, at 12:48 PM, David Magda wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2011, at 14:24, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>
It all depends on the number of drives in the VDEV(s), traffic
patterns during resilver, speed VDEV fill, of drives etc. Still,
close to 6 days is a lot. Can you detail your c
> I think maybe the "number of drives in the vdev" perhaps come into
> play because that when people have a lot of disks, they often put them
> into RAIDZ[123] configurations. So it's just a matter of confusing the
> (IOps limiting) configuration with the fact that one may have many
> disks.
My an
On Mar 20, 2011, at 14:24, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>>> It all depends on the number of drives in the VDEV(s), traffic
>>> patterns during resilver, speed VDEV fill, of drives etc. Still,
>>> close to 6 days is a lot. Can you detail your configuration?
>>
>> How many times do we have to rehash
On Mar 20, 2011, at 14:33, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> I hear from reliable sources that Apple is not doing anything with ZFS,
> so I would not look there for leadership.
Given that one of the prominent (?) file system guys at Apple left to form his
own ZFS company, I figured that was the case even
> > It all depends on the number of drives in the VDEV(s), traffic
> > patterns during resilver, speed VDEV fill, of drives etc. Still,
> > close to 6 days is a lot. Can you detail your configuration?
>
> How many times do we have to rehash this? The speed of resilver is
> dependent on the amount
On Mar 20, 2011, at 4:33 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>> Has anyone seen a resilver longer than this for a 500G drive in a
>> riadz2 vdev?
Depending on the ZFS implementation, this is expected. Later builds
have the resilver throttle.
>> scrub: resilver completed after 169h25m with 0 errors
On Mar 20, 2011, at 09:26, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> The long term acceptance for ZFS depends on how Oracle will behave past the
> announced Solaris 11 is released. If they don't Opensource the related ZFS,
> they will harm the future of ZFS. If they Opensource it again, there is still
> a
> pr
Fred Liu wrote:
> Probably, we need place a tag before zfs -- Opensource-ZFS or Oracle-ZFS
> after Solaris11 release.
> If it is true, these two ZFSes will definitely evolve into different
> directions.
> BTW, Did Oracle unveil the actual release date? We are also at the cross
> road...
The
Probably, we need place a tag before zfs -- Opensource-ZFS or Oracle-ZFS after
Solaris11 release.
If it is true, these two ZFSes will definitely evolve into different directions.
BTW, Did Oracle unveil the actual release date? We are also at the cross
road...
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Mess
769G resilvered on a 500G drive? I'm guessing there was a whole bunch of
activity (and probably snapshot creation) happening alongside the resilver.
On 20 March 2011 18:57, Ian Collins wrote:
> Has anyone seen a resilver longer than this for a 500G drive in a riadz2
> vdev?
>
> scrub: resilver
> Has anyone seen a resilver longer than this for a 500G drive in a
> riadz2 vdev?
>
> scrub: resilver completed after 169h25m with 0 errors on Sun Mar 20
> 19:57:37 2011
> c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 769G resilvered
>
> and I told the client it would take 3 to 4 days!
It all depends on the number of dr
Has anyone seen a resilver longer than this for a 500G drive in a
riadz2 vdev?
scrub: resilver completed after 169h25m with 0 errors on Sun Mar 20
19:57:37 2011
c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 769G resilvered
and I told the client it would take 3 to 4 days!
:)
--
Ian.
__
17 matches
Mail list logo
