On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:17:08PM -0800, Brandon High wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:10 PM, taemun wrote:
> > Sorry, you're right. If they're using 512B internally, this is a non-event
> > here. I think that most folks talking about 3TB drives in this list are
> > looking for internal drives.
It is possible to convert "octal representation" of zfs diff output to
something human readable?
Iconv may be?
Please see screenshot http://i.imgur.com/bHhXV.png
I create file with russian name there. OS is Solaris 11 Express.
This command did the job:
zfs diff | perl -plne 's#\\\d{8}(\d
> From: Ross Walker [mailto:rswwal...@gmail.com]
>
> Well besides databases there are VM datastores, busy email servers, busy
> ldap servers, busy web servers, and I'm sure the list goes on and on.
>
> I'm sure it is much harder to list servers that are truly sequential in IO
then
> random. This
> From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [mailto:r...@karlsbakk.net]
>
> > Bear a few things in mind:
> >
> > iops is not iops.
>
>
> I am totally aware of these differences, but it seems some people think
> RAIDz is nonsense unless you don't need speed at all. My testing shows (so
> far) that the speed is
On 07/12/2010 23:54, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
Is is possible to expand the size of a ZFS volume?
It was created with the following command:
zfs create -V 20G ldomspool/test
see man page for zfs, section about volsize property.
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
__
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:10 PM, taemun wrote:
> Sorry, you're right. If they're using 512B internally, this is a non-event
> here. I think that most folks talking about 3TB drives in this list are
> looking for internal drives. That the desktop dock (USB, I presume)
> coalesces blocks doesn't real
Is is possible to expand the size of a ZFS volume?
It was created with the following command:
zfs create -V 20G ldomspool/test
Thanks
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>> Bear a few things in mind:
>>
>> iops is not iops.
>
>
> I am totally aware of these differences, but it seems some people think RAIDz
> is nonsense unless you don't need speed at all. My testing shows (so far)
> that the speed is q
I was told that this could be caused by
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6792701
Removing large holey file does not free space
However, attempts to verify the cause were fruitless as zdb dumps core:
r...@onix# zdb -ddd p0
...
partial [2473161,2473169)
> Bear a few things in mind:
>
> iops is not iops.
I am totally aware of these differences, but it seems some people think RAIDz
is nonsense unless you don't need speed at all. My testing shows (so far) that
the speed is quite good, far better than single drives. Also, as Eric said,
those spe
- Original Message -
> hi all
>
> I had a 7-VDEV raid on some drives, and after rearranging them a bit
11-vdev, even, but the problem was fm had stepped in and found something was
wrong with c8t35d0. To fix this, I did:
# fmadm repaired
hc://:product-id=LSI-CORP-SAS2X28:server-id=:cha
hi all
I had a 7-VDEV raid on some drives, and after rearranging them a bit, I booted
up once more and tried to recreate a new, albeit similar zpool on them. This
gave me an error message, c8t35d0 not available. The disk is there, is visible
from the controller BIOS etc, so I tried to boot on t
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Curtis Schiewek wrote:
Hi Mark,
I've tried running "zpool attach media ad24 ad12" (ad12 being the new
disk) and I get no response. I tried leaving the command run for an
extended period of time and nothing happens.
What version of solaris are you running?
__
Hello.
It is possible to convert "octal representation" of zfs diff output to
something human readable?
Iconv may be?
Please see screenshot http://i.imgur.com/bHhXV.png
I create file with russian name there. OS is Solaris 11 Express.
___
zfs-discuss
14 matches
Mail list logo
