On 08 November, 2010 - Peter Taps sent me these 0,7K bytes:
> Folks,
>
> My understanding is that there is a way to create a zfs "checkpoint"
> before doing any system upgrade or installing a new software. If
> there is a problem, one can simply rollback to the stable checkpoint.
>
> I am famil
> I have this with 36 2TB drives (and 2 separate boot drives).
>
> http://www.colfax-intl.com/jlrid/SpotLight_more_Acc.asp?L=134&S=58&B=2267
That's just a Supermicro SC847.
http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/4U/?chs=847
Stay away from the 24 port expander backplanes. I've gone thru sever
Folks,
My understanding is that there is a way to create a zfs "checkpoint" before
doing any system upgrade or installing a new software. If there is a problem,
one can simply rollback to the stable checkpoint.
I am familiar with snapshots and clones. However, I am not clear on how to
manage
besson3c wrote:
This has happened to me several times now, I'm confused as to why...
This one particular drive, and its always the same drive, randomly shows up as
being removed from the pool. I have to export and import the pool in order to
have this disk seen again and for re-silvering to re
This has happened to me several times now, I'm confused as to why...
This one particular drive, and its always the same drive, randomly shows up as
being removed from the pool. I have to export and import the pool in order to
have this disk seen again and for re-silvering to reoccur. When this l
I have this with 36 2TB drives (and 2 separate boot drives).
http://www.colfax-intl.com/jlrid/SpotLight_more_Acc.asp?L=134&S=58&B=2267
It's not exactly the same (it has cons/pros), but it is definitely
less expensive. I'm running b147 on it with an LSI controller.
-Moazam
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at
Oracle have deleted the best ZFS platform I know, the X4540.
Does anyone know of an equivalent system? None of the current
Oracle/Sun offerings come close.
--
Ian.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.or
Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:
+--
| On 2010-11-08 13:27:09, Peter Taps wrote:
|
| From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrore
+--
| On 2010-11-08 13:27:09, Peter Taps wrote:
|
| From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more
vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs, and
a mirror can be
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Peter Taps wrote:
> Folks,
>
> From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more
> vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs,
> and a mirror can be built across a few raidz vdevs.
>
> Is my understanding correc
Folks,
>From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more vdevs.
>That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs, and a
>mirror can be built across a few raidz vdevs.
Is my understanding correct? Also, is there a limit on the depth of a vdev?
Thank
> I'm wondering if #6975124 could be the cause of my problem, too.
there are several zfs send (and receive) related issues with 111b. You might
seriously want to consider upgrading to more recent opensolaris (134) or
openindiana
Yours
Markus Kovero
_
Does anyone know the current state of bug #6975124? Has there been any progress
since August?
I currently have an OpenSolaris 2009.06 snv_111b system (entire
0.5.11-0.111.14) which *repeatedly* gets stuck after a couple of minutes during
a large (xxx GB) incremental zfs receive operation. The p
13 matches
Mail list logo
