Re: [zfs-discuss] Dedup - Does "on" imply "sha256?"

2010-08-28 Thread Brandon High
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Peter Taps wrote: > It appears it is better to use "on" instead of "sha256." This way, you are > letting zfs decide the best option. It's probably better to specify the hash type, actually. If "on" were to change in the future version, data written after that poi

Re: [zfs-discuss] native ZFS on Linux

2010-08-28 Thread Anurag Agarwal
Hi Erik, Thanks for clarifying it. You are absolutely right. It is a limited beta. Every one being part of beta program will have access to source code. We want to have it first validated by a limited number of people, before opening it to everyone. Let us know if any one would like to participat

Re: [zfs-discuss] native ZFS on Linux

2010-08-28 Thread Erik Trimble
On 8/28/2010 8:55 PM, Miles Nordin wrote: "aa" == Anurag Agarwal writes: aa> * Currently we are planning to do a closed beta aa> * Source code will be made available with release. CDDL violation. I think he meant that rather than an "open beta" where they'd make it available t

Re: [zfs-discuss] native ZFS on Linux

2010-08-28 Thread Miles Nordin
> "aa" == Anurag Agarwal writes: aa> * Currently we are planning to do a closed beta aa> * Source code will be made available with release. CDDL violation. aa> * We will be providing paid support for our binary aa> releases. great, so long as your ``binary releases'' alwa

Re: [zfs-discuss] ufs root to zfs root liveupgrade?

2010-08-28 Thread Ian Collins
On 08/28/10 11:39 PM, LaoTsao 老曹 wrote: hi all Try to learn how UFS root to ZFS root liveUG work. I download the vbox image of s10u8, it come up as UFS root. add a new disks (16GB) create zpool rpool run lucreate -n zfsroot -p rpool run luactivate zfsroot run lustatus it do show zfsroot will

Re: [zfs-discuss] Write Once Read Many on ZFS

2010-08-28 Thread Richard Elling
On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Douglas Silva wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to know if there is a way to use WORM property on ZFS. Yes. NexentaStor has been developing WORM plugin. http://www.nexenta.com/corp/content/view/171/112/ http://www.nexenta.com/demos/worm.html -- richard -- OpenStorage Sum

Re: [zfs-discuss] 'sync' properties and write operations.

2010-08-28 Thread Robert Milkowski
On 28/08/2010 09:55, eXeC001er wrote: Hi. Can you explain to me: 1. dataset has 'sync=always' I start write to file on this dataset in no-sync mode: system write file in sync or async mode? sync 2. dataset has 'sync=disabled' I start write to file on this dataset in sync mode: system w

Re: [zfs-discuss] mirrored pool unimportable (FAULTED)

2010-08-28 Thread Alex Blewitt
On 28 Aug 2010, at 16:25, Norbert Harder wrote: > Later, since the development of the ZFS extension was discontinued ... The MacZFS project lives on at Google Code and http://github.com/alblue/mac-zfs Not that it helps if the data has already become corrupted. Alex ___

[zfs-discuss] mirrored pool unimportable (FAULTED)

2010-08-28 Thread Norbert Harder
Hi, more than a year ago I created a mirrored ZFS-Pool consiting of 2x1TB HDDs using the OSX 10.5 ZFS Kernel Extension (Zpool Version 8, ZFS Version 2). Everything went fine and I used the pool to store personal stuff on it, like lots of photos and music. (So getting the data back is not time crit

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs-discuss Digest, Vol 58, Issue 117

2010-08-28 Thread Allen Eastwood
>> hi all >> Try to learn how UFS root to ZFS root liveUG work. >> >> I download the vbox image of s10u8, it come up as UFS root. >> add a new disks (16GB) >> create zpool rpool >> run lucreate -n zfsroot -p rpool >> run luactivate zfsroot >> run lustatus it do show zfsroot will be active in ne

Re: [zfs-discuss] VM's on ZFS - 7210

2010-08-28 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:50:38AM -0700, Eff Norwood wrote: >> I can't think of an easy way to measure pages that have not been consumed >> since it's really an SSD controller function which is obfuscated from the >> OS, and add the varia

Re: [zfs-discuss] VM's on ZFS - 7210

2010-08-28 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:50:38AM -0700, Eff Norwood wrote: > I can't think of an easy way to measure pages that have not been consumed > since it's really an SSD controller function which is obfuscated from the OS, > and add the variable of over provisioning on top of that. If anyone would > l

Re: [zfs-discuss] ufs root to zfs root liveupgrade?

2010-08-28 Thread LaoTsao 老曹
thx try to detach the old ufs and boot from the new zfsroot it fail I reattach the ufsroot disk and find out that in the rpool/boot/grub/menu.1st findroot (rootfs0,0,a) and not findroot (pool_rpool,0,a) not sure what is the correct findroot here even with this change to findroot and try to boot

Re: [zfs-discuss] VM's on ZFS - 7210

2010-08-28 Thread Eff Norwood
I can't think of an easy way to measure pages that have not been consumed since it's really an SSD controller function which is obfuscated from the OS, and add the variable of over provisioning on top of that. If anyone would like to really get into what's going on inside of an SSD that makes it

Re: [zfs-discuss] ufs root to zfs root liveupgrade?

2010-08-28 Thread Casper . Dik
> hi all >Try to learn how UFS root to ZFS root liveUG work. > >I download the vbox image of s10u8, it come up as UFS root. >add a new disks (16GB) >create zpool rpool >run lucreate -n zfsroot -p rpool >run luactivate zfsroot >run lustatus it do show zfsroot will be active in next boot >init 6

[zfs-discuss] ufs root to zfs root liveupgrade?

2010-08-28 Thread LaoTsao 老曹
hi all Try to learn how UFS root to ZFS root liveUG work. I download the vbox image of s10u8, it come up as UFS root. add a new disks (16GB) create zpool rpool run lucreate -n zfsroot -p rpool run luactivate zfsroot run lustatus it do show zfsroot will be active in next boot init 6 but it come

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool

2010-08-28 Thread eXeC001er
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:54, Darin Perusich > wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to > find an > > answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage > pool and > > the increased available storage isn't reflected

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool

2010-08-28 Thread Mattias Pantzare
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:54, Darin Perusich wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an > answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and > the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list'

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs lists discrepancy after added a new vdev to pool

2010-08-28 Thread Tomas Ögren
On 27 August, 2010 - Darin Perusich sent me these 2,1K bytes: > Hello All, > > I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find > an > answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool > and > the increased available storage isn't reflected

[zfs-discuss] 'sync' properties and write operations.

2010-08-28 Thread eXeC001er
Hi. Can you explain to me: 1. dataset has 'sync=always' I start write to file on this dataset in no-sync mode: system write file in sync or async mode? 2. dataset has 'sync=disabled' I start write to file on this dataset in sync mode: system write file in sync or async mode? Thanks. ___

Re: [zfs-discuss] VM's on ZFS - 7210

2010-08-28 Thread Simone Caldana
Il giorno 27/ago/2010, alle ore 21.46, Mark ha scritto: > Right now we're using NFS for our ESX Servers. The only iSCSI LUN's I have > are mounted inside a couple Windows VM's. I'd have to migrate all our VM's > to iSCSI, which I'm willing to do if it would help and not cause other issues. It