> From: Ian Collins [mailto:i...@ianshome.com]
> > From: Edward Ned Harvey
> > The sun hardware is the
> > recommended way to go, but it's also more expensive.
>
> Not in my neck of the woods, Sun have always been most competitive.
Interesting. I wonder what's different between you and me? I mo
> From: BM [mailto:bogdan.maryn...@gmail.com]
>
> But don't forget that Oracle looks like killing OpenSolaris and entire
> community
> after all: there are no latest builds at genunix.org (latest is 134 and
> seems
> like that's it), Oracle stopped build OSOL after build 135 (I have no
> idea wher
On 07/14/10 04:20 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Here's a really simple way to get some pricing information:
Go to Dell.com. Servers. Servers. Rack. Enhanced. PowerEdge R710
(Customize.)
You could pick any server that supports solaris. I just chose the R710
because I know it does.
Operating
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Dave Pooser
>
> I'm looking at a new web server for the company, and am considering
> Solaris
> specifically because of ZFS. (Oracle's lousy sales model-- specifically
> the
> unwillingness to
Ok thanx will do that .
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
> ZFS was the sole factor in my decision to buy a Sun server with solaris this
> year, to replace my netapp. In addition, I bought some dell machines and
> paid for solaris on those, to keep around as backup destinations for the
> product
Actually, there's still the primary issue of this post - the apparent hang. At
the moment, I have 3 zpool commands running, all apparently hung and doing
nothing:
bleon...@opensolaris:~$ ps -ef | grep zpool
root 20465 20411 0 18:10:44 pts/4 0:00 zpool clear r5pool
root 20408 2040
One question I did have and it might be a stupid one. SO on this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN6iDzesEs0&feature=related or this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGIwg6ye1gE
What is the greenbars that is on the right of the projector screen?
Thanks
-Beau
__
Hello,
I'm using Nexenta and am impressed by allof the OpenSolaris, ZFS and
Nexenta parts, thank you for feeing us of the RAID hole.
Having created zvols in a pool (6 mirror sets, 2 SSDs for L2ARC), with
compression turned on, I am now realising that the data stored in the
L2ARC SSD is the '
Hi Richard,
What happened is this SSD gave some IO errors and the pool become degraded, so
after the machine got rebooted, I found that the pool became unavailable.
The SSD drive itself is toasted, as bios now reports it as 8 GB in size and
name is "Inuem SS E Cootmoader!", so all the partitions
On 07/14/10 03:55 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
On Fri, July 9, 2010 16:49, BJ Quinn wrote:
I have a couple of systems running 2009.06 that hang on relatively large
zfs send/recv jobs. With the -v option, I see the snapshots coming
across, and at some point the process just pauses, IO and CP
Thanks for quick response. I appreciate it much.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> "ds" == Dmitry Sorokin writes:
ds> The SSD drive has failed and zpool is unavailable anymore.
AIUI,
6733267 Allow a pool to be imported with a missing slog
is only fixed for the case where the pool is still imported. If you
export it without removing the slog first, the pool is los
I was going with the spring release myself, and finally got tired of waiting.
Got to build some new servers.
I don't believe you've missed anything. As I'm sure you know, it was
originally officially 2010.02, then it was officially 2010.03, then it was
rumored to be .04, sort of leaked as .0
>
> It could be a disk failing and dragging I/O down with it.
>
> Try to check for high asvc_t with `iostat -XCn 1` and errors in `iostat -En`
>
> Any timeouts or retries in /var/adm/messages ?
>
> --
> Giovanni Tirloni
> gtirl...@sysdroid.com
>
I checked for high service times during a scrub, and
The setting of the "content_architectures" field is likely to be
independent of the file system type, so at least at first glance, I
don't think that this is zfs issue. You might try this question at
install-disc...@opensolaris.org.
Lori
On 07/13/10 11:45 AM, Ketan wrote:
I have created
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Brent Jones wrote:
> I have been running a pair of X4540's for almost 2 years now, the
> usual spec (Quad core, 64GB RAM, 48x 1TB).
> I have a pair of mirrored drives for rpool, and a Raidz set with 5-6
> disks in each vdev for the rest of the disks.
> I am running
I have created a flash archive from a Ldom on T5220 with zfs root solaris
10_u8. But after creation of flar the info shows the
content_architectures=sun4c,sun4d,sun4m,sun4u,sun4us,sun4s but not sun4v due to
which i 'm unable to install this flash archive on another Ldom on the same
host. Is the
I have been running a pair of X4540's for almost 2 years now, the
usual spec (Quad core, 64GB RAM, 48x 1TB).
I have a pair of mirrored drives for rpool, and a Raidz set with 5-6
disks in each vdev for the rest of the disks.
I am running snv_132 on both systems.
I noticed an oddity on one particula
Hi Cindy,
I'm trying to demonstrate how ZFS behaves when a disk fails. The drive
enclosure I'm using (http://www.icydock.com/product/mb561us-4s-1.html) says it
supports hot swap, but that's not what I'm experiencing. When I plug the disk
back in, all 4 disks are no longer recognizable until I r
On Fri, July 9, 2010 18:42, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:49 PM, BJ Quinn wrote:
>> I have a couple of systems running 2009.06 that hang on relatively large
>> zfs send/recv jobs. With the -v option, I see the snapshots coming
>> across, and at some point the process just pa
On Fri, July 9, 2010 16:49, BJ Quinn wrote:
> I have a couple of systems running 2009.06 that hang on relatively large
> zfs send/recv jobs. With the -v option, I see the snapshots coming
> across, and at some point the process just pauses, IO and CPU usage go to
> zero, and it takes a hard reboo
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> CDDL contains an explicit disclaimer of warranty, which means, if Apple were
> to download CDDL ZFS source code and compile and distribute it themselves,
> they would be fully liable for any lawsuit waged against them. But CDDL
> also allows for Sun to distribute ZFS b
On 7/12/10 Jul 12, 10:49 AM, "Linder, Doug"
wrote:
> Out of sheer curiosity - and I'm not disagreeing with you, just wondering -
> how does ZFS make money for Oracle when they don't charge for it? Do you
> think it's such an important feature that it's a big factor in customers
> picking Solaris
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:51 -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us]
> >
> > > A private license, with support and indemnification from Sun, would
> > > shield Apple from any lawsuit from Netapp.
> >
> > The patent holder is not compelled
> >
> From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us]
>
> > A private license, with support and indemnification from Sun, would
> > shield Apple from any lawsuit from Netapp.
>
> The patent holder is not compelled
> in any way to offer a license for use of the patent. Without a patent
> l
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Linder, Doug
>
> Out of sheer curiosity - and I'm not disagreeing with you, just
> wondering - how does ZFS make money for Oracle when they don't charge
> for it? Do you think it's such an imp
The whole disk layout should be copied from disk 1 to 2, then the slice on disk
2 that corresponds to the slice on disk 1 should be attached to the rpool which
forms an rpool mirror (attached not added).
Then you need to add the grub bootloader to disk 2.
When it finishes resilvering then you
While we're on the topic, has anyone used ZFS much with Vormetric's encryption
product? Any feedback?
Doug Linder
--
Learn more about Merchant Link at www.merchantlink.com.
THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL. This e-mail message and any attachments are
proprietary and confidential inform
I do apologies but I am completely lost here Maybe I am just not
understanding. Are you saying that a slice has to be created on the seond
drive before it can bee added to the pool?
Thanks
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Cindy Swearingen <
cindy.swearin...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
