> From: Steve Staples [mailto:thestapler...@gmail.com]
>
> I am currently using OpenSolaris 2009.06
> If I was to upgrade to the current "developer" version, forgive my
> ignorance
> (since I am new to *solaris), but how would I do this?
If you go to genunix.org (using the URL in my previous emai
> From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [mailto:r...@karlsbakk.net]
> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 11:55 AM
>
> > I am currently using OpenSolaris 2009.06
> > If I was to upgrade to the current "developer" version, forgive my
> > ignorance
> > (since I am new to *solaris), but how would I do this?
>
> # pkg s
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
>
> bash-4.0# mkfile -n 2 d0
> bash-4.0# zpool create pool $PWD/d0
> bash-4.0# mkfile -n 1992869543936 d1
> bash-4.0# zpool attach pool $PWD/d0 $PWD/d1
As long
On 2010-May-02 04:06:41 +0800, Diogo Franco wrote:
>regular data corruption and then the box locked up. I had also
>converted the pool to v14 a few days before, so the freebsd v13 tools
>couldn't do anything to help.
Note that ZFS v14 was imported to FreeBSD 8-stable in mid-January.
I can't comme
On May 2, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> - "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" skrev:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have a test system with snv134 and 8x2TB drives in RAIDz2 and
>> currently no Zil or L2ARC. I noticed the I/O speed to NFS shares on
>> the testpool drops to something hardly usable
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Giovanni wrote:
> But here's the kicker, what if I have a single drive for root pool, and its
> failing... I connect a new HDD to replace the boot drive thats dying, ZFS has
> no way of migrating to a new drive?
You can move root pools, I did it yesterday from a
You do know that OpenSolaris + VirtualBox can trash your ZFS raid? You can
loose your data. There is a post about write cache and ZFS and VirtualbBox, I
think you need to disable it?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing l
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Giovanni wrote:
Thank you. I was not aware that root pools could not be moved.
But here's the kicker, what if I have a single drive for root pool,
and its failing... I connect a new HDD to replace the boot drive
thats dying, ZFS has no way of migrating to a new drive?
Th
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Dave Pooser wrote:
If my system is going to fail under the stress of a scrub, it's going to
fail under the stress of a resilver. From my perspective, I'm not as scared
I don't disagree with any of the opinions you stated except to point
out that resilver will usually hit t
Thank you. I was not aware that root pools could not be moved.
But here's the kicker, what if I have a single drive for root pool, and its
failing... I connect a new HDD to replace the boot drive thats dying, ZFS has
no way of migrating to a new drive?
Thanks
--
This message posted from openso
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Any guidance on how to do it? I tried to do zfs snapshot
You can't boot off raidz. That's for data only.
Unless you use FreeBSD ...
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagic
On 5/2/10 3:12 PM, "Bob Friesenhahn" wrote:
> On the flip-side, using 'zfs scrub' puts more stress on the system
> which may make it more likely to fail. It increases load on the power
> supplies, CPUs, interfaces, and disks. A system which might work fine
> under normal load may be stressed an
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Richard Elling wrote:
These calculations are based on fixed MTBF. But disk MTBF decreases with
age. Most disks are only rated at 3-5 years of expected lifetime. Hence,
archivists
use solutions with longer lifetimes (high quality tape = 30 years) and plans for
migrating the
- "Giovanni" skrev:
> Hi guys
>
> I am new to Opensolaris and ZFS world, I have 6x2TB SATA hdds on my
> system, I picked a single 2TB disk and installed opensolaris
> (therefore zpool was created by the installer)
>
> I went ahead and created a new pool "gpool" with raidz (the kind of
> red
You can't get rid of rpool. That's the pool you're booting from. Root
pools can only be single disks or n-way mirrors.
As to your other question, you can view the snapshots by using the
command "zfs list -t all", or turn on the listsnaps property for the
pool. See http://docs.sun.com/app/d
Hi guys
I am new to Opensolaris and ZFS world, I have 6x2TB SATA hdds on my system, I
picked a single 2TB disk and installed opensolaris (therefore zpool was created
by the installer)
I went ahead and created a new pool "gpool" with raidz (the kind of redundancy
I want. Here's the output:
@se
- "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" skrev:
> Hi all
>
> I have a test system with snv134 and 8x2TB drives in RAIDz2 and
> currently no Zil or L2ARC. I noticed the I/O speed to NFS shares on
> the testpool drops to something hardly usable while scrubbing the
> pool.
>
> How can I address this? Will add
On May 1, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> Without a periodic scrub that touches every single bit of data in the pool,
>> how can you be sure
>> that 10-year files that haven't been opened in 5 years are still intact?
>
> You don't. But it se
On May 2, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Jan Riechers wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Jan Riechers
> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> wrote:
> - "Jan Riechers" skrev:
> I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only using
> 40G s
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Jan Riechers wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> wrote:
>
>> - "Jan Riechers" skrev:
>>
>> I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only
>> using 40G since I thought I might use the rest for something el
Hello,
thanks for the feedback and sorry for the delay in answering.
I checked the log and the fmadm. It seems the log does not show changes,
however fmadm shows:
Apr 23 2010 18:32:26.363495457 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.dev.rqs.derr
Apr 23 2010 18:32:26.363482031 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.recov
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Tonmaus wrote:
I am under the impression that exactly those were the considerations
for both the ZFS designers to implement a scrub function to ZFS and
the author of Best Practises to recommend performing this function
frequently. I am hearing you are coming to a different
- "Ian D" skrev:
Hi! We're building our first dedicated ZFS-based NAS/SAN (probably using
Nexenta) and I'd like to run the specs by you all to see if you have any
recommendations. All of it is already bought, but it's not too late to add to
it.
Dell PowerEdge R910
2x Intel X7550 2GHz
> I am currently using OpenSolaris 2009.06
> If I was to upgrade to the current "developer" version, forgive my
> ignorance
> (since I am new to *solaris), but how would I do this?
# pkg set-publisher -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev opensolaris.org
# pkg image-update
That'll take you to snv_134
Hi all
Testing variable size 'disks' in mirror, I followed Victor Latushkin's example
bash-4.0# mkfile -n 2 d0
bash-4.0# zpool create pool $PWD/d0
bash-4.0# mkfile -n 1992869543936 d1
bash-4.0# zpool attach pool $PWD/d0 $PWD/d1
and so on - this works well. Now, to try to mess with ZF
> > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Steve Staples
> >
> > My problem is, is that not all 2TB hard drives are the same size (even
> > though they should be 2 trillion bytes, there is still sometimes a +/-
> > (I've
> > only not
> On May 2, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Steve Staples wrote:
>
> > Hi there!
> >
> > I am new to the list, and to OpenSolaris, as well as ZPS.
> >
> > I am creating a zpool/zfs to use on my NAS server, and basically I want
some
> > redundancy for my files/media. What I am looking to do, is get a bunch
of
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Steve Staples
>
> My problem is, is that not all 2TB hard drives are the same size (even
> though they should be 2 trillion bytes, there is still sometimes a +/-
> (I've
> only noticed this 2x
> From: cas...@holland.sun.com [mailto:cas...@holland.sun.com] On Behalf
> Of casper@sun.com
>
> It is certainly possible to create a .zfs/snapshot_byinode but it is
> not
> clear when it helps but it can be used for finding the earlier copy of
> a
> directory (netapp/.snapshot)
Do you happen
- "Richard L. Hamilton" skrev:
> One can rename a zpool on import
>
> zpool import -f pool_or_id newname
>
> Is there any way to rename it (back again, perhaps)
> on export?
>
> (I had to rename rpool in an old disk image to access
> some stuff in it, and I'd like to put it back the way it
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> - "Jan Riechers" skrev:
>
> I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only
> using 40G since I thought I might use the rest for something else. ZFS Time
> Slider was complaining the pool was filled for 90% a
One can rename a zpool on import
zpool import -f pool_or_id newname
Is there any way to rename it (back again, perhaps)
on export?
(I had to rename rpool in an old disk image to access
some stuff in it, and I'd like to put it back the way it
was so it's properly usable if I ever want to boot off
Hi! We're building our first dedicated ZFS-based NAS/SAN (probably using
Nexenta) and I'd like to run the specs by you all to see if you have any
recommendations. All of it is already bought, but it's not too late to add to
it.
Dell PowerEdge R9102x Intel X7550 2GHz, 8 cores each plus Hyper
- "Jan Riechers" skrev:
I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only using
40G since I thought I might use the rest for something else. ZFS Time Slider
was complaining the pool was filled for 90% and I decided to increase pool
size.
What I did was a zpool detac
I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only using
40G since I thought I might use the rest for something else. ZFS Time Slider
was complaining the pool was filled for 90% and I decided to increase pool
size.
What I did was a zpool detach of one of the mirrored hdds and in
On May 2, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Steve Staples wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I am new to the list, and to OpenSolaris, as well as ZPS.
>
> I am creating a zpool/zfs to use on my NAS server, and basically I want some
> redundancy for my files/media. What I am looking to do, is get a bunch of
> 2TB drives,
>You can do in the kernel by calling vnodetopath(). I don't know if it
>is exposed to user space.
Yes, in /proc/*/path (kinda).
>But that could be slow if you have large directories so you have to
>think about where you would use it.
The kernel caches file names; however, it cannot be use for
Hi Bob,
>
> It is necessary to look at all the factors which
> might result in data
> loss before deciding what the most effective steps
> are to minimize
> the probability of loss.
>
> Bob
I am under the impression that exactly those were the considerations for both
the ZFS designers to impl
38 matches
Mail list logo
