On what is now a live system, I had previously been tinkering with ZFS,
creating and destroying pools and datasets.
Those old pools still seem to be visible to the system even though I've
re-created new pools with new names :
zpool status
pool: BackupP0
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
What does it mean for the reported value of a zvol volsize to be
less than the product of used and compressratio?
For example,
# zfs get -p all home1/home1mm01
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
home1/home1mm01 type volume -
home1/home1m
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 08:11 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> same problem here on sun x2100 amd64
It's a bootblock issue. If you really want to get back to u6 you have to
"installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /boot/grub/stage2" from th update 6 image
so mount it (with lumount or easier, with zfs mount) and m
same problem here on sun x2100 amd64
i started with a core installation of u7 with the only patches applied as
outlined in live upgrade doco 206844 (
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-61-206844-1 ).
also as stated in doco:
pkgrm SUNWlucfg SUNWluu SUNWlur
and then from 10/9
Hi,
I have a zpool with 3 mirrors containing each 2 drivers, I replaced one
of the drives doing:
zpool offline tank-nfs c9t7d0
Then I replaced that drive and started a rebuild using:
zpool replace tank-nfs c9t7d0
All drives in the pool are Seagate ES.2 1TB SAS drives
After 15 hours
We were holding our breath for ZFS user-quotas, so we went u8, and upgraded the
pool immediately. No issues here. But I had to install from CD, as LiveUpgrade
failed. (bootadm -e no such argument)
ZFS send appears faster in u8 too, as it was still slow in u7.
Lund
dick hoogendijk wrote:
A
