On Fri, Aug 21 at 12:22, Jason Pfingstmann wrote:
This is an odd question, to be certain, but I need to find out what
size a 1.5 TB drive is to help me create a sparse/fake array.
(Personally, I think you're making your job a lot harder than it
should be. Just wait til you have the real disks,
Greetings to everyone!
I'm trying to move the home filesystem from my root pool to another
pool, and I'm really lost. Specifically to move rpool/export/home to
tank/home. I did the following:
1. Created a snapshot of rpool/export/home (with -r option set)
2. Did a zfs send -R ... | zfs receive -d
Marcus wrote:
- how to best handle broken disks/controllers without ZFS hanging or
being unable to replace the disk
A definite +1 here. I realise it's something that Sun probably consider
"fixed by the disk/controller drivers", however many of us are using
opensolaris on non-sun hardware,
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Richard Elling wrote:
magnitude for HDDs). Depending on the repair policy, the probability
of losing a SAS controller is expected to be less than the
probability of losing 3 disks in a raidz2. Since SAS is relatively
easy to make redundant, a really paranoid person would h
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Ron Mexico wrote:
Since I can't make a mirrored raidz2, I'd like the next best thing.
If that means doing a zfs send from one raidz2 to the other, that's
fine.
Without using heirarchical servers (e.g. volumes from a zfs pool
exported via iSCSI to be part of another zfs
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Tim Cook wrote:
Raid10 won't provide as much protection. Raidz21, you can lose any 4
drives, and up to 14 if it's the right 14. Raid10, if you lose the wrong
two drives, you're done.
On the flip side, the chance of loosing a second drive during the
recovery interval is
comment far below...
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Richard Elling > wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Richard Elling > wrote:
My vote is with Ross. KISS wins :-)
Disclaimer: I'm also a member of
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Adam Sherman wrote:
On 21-Aug-09, at 21:04 , Richard Elling wrote:
My point is, RAIDZx+1 SHOULD be simple. I don't entirely
understand why it hasn't been implemented. I can only imagine
like so many other things it's because there hasn't been
significant cus
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Richard Elling
>> wrote:
>>
>> My vote is with Ross. KISS wins :-)
>> Disclaimer: I'm also a member of BAARF.
>>
>>
>> My point is, RAIDZx+1 SHOULD be simple
On 21-Aug-09, at 21:04 , Richard Elling wrote:
My point is, RAIDZx+1 SHOULD be simple. I don't entirely
understand why it hasn't been implemented. I can only imagine like
so many other things it's because there hasn't been significant
customer demand. Unfortunate if it's as simple as I be
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Richard Elling > wrote:
My vote is with Ross. KISS wins :-)
Disclaimer: I'm also a member of BAARF.
My point is, RAIDZx+1 SHOULD be simple. I don't entirely understand
why it hasn't been implemented. I can only i
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico wrote:
>>
>> I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to be
>> based
On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker
wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico
wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to
be based on Open Solaris and ZFS, running on a Dell R710 with two
SAS 5/
Ron Mexico wrote:
You'll have to add a bit of meat to "this"!
What are you resiliency, space and performance
requirements?
Resiliency is most important, followed by space and then speed. It's primary
function is to host digital assets for ad agencies and backups of other servers
and wor
> You'll have to add a bit of meat to "this"!
>
> What are you resiliency, space and performance
> requirements?
Resiliency is most important, followed by space and then speed. It's primary
function is to host digital assets for ad agencies and backups of other servers
and workstations in the o
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker <
> rswwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico <
>> no-re...@opensolaris.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm in the process o
Check with Vista if you have permissions to read the file. I
experienced the same problem (that's why I posted another questions to
the CIFS mailing list about mapping users with idmap). It always
happens when I copy these files from the iPhone. These files result
with such permissions:
$ ls -dV I
Ron Mexico wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to be based
on Open Solaris and ZFS, running on a Dell R710 with two SAS 5/E HBAs. Each HBA
will be connected to a 24 bay Supermicro JBOD chassis. Each chassis will have
12 drives to start out with, giving us r
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker
wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico
wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to
be based on Open Solaris and ZFS, running on a Dell R710 with two
SA
As you can add multiple vdevs to a pool, my suggestion would be to do several
smaller raidz1 or raidz2 vdevs in the pool.
With your setup - assuming 2 HBAs @ 24 drives each your setup would have
yielded 20 drives usable storage (about) (assuming raidz2 with 2 spares on each
HBA) and then mirror
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to be
>> based on Open Solaris and ZFS, running on a Dell R710 with two SAS 5/E HBAs.
>> Each HBA will be connected to a 24
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico
wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to
be based on Open Solaris and ZFS, running on a Dell R710 with two
SAS 5/E HBAs. Each HBA will be connected to a 24 bay Supermicro JBOD
chassis. Each chassis will have 12 dr
I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to be based
on Open Solaris and ZFS, running on a Dell R710 with two SAS 5/E HBAs. Each HBA
will be connected to a 24 bay Supermicro JBOD chassis. Each chassis will have
12 drives to start out with, giving us room for expansion as
Checksum all of the files using something like md5sum and see if
they're actually identical. Then test each step of the copy and see
which one is corrupting your files.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> During the course of backup I had occassion to copy a number of
> quickti
During the course of backup I had occassion to copy a number of
quicktime video (*.mov) files to zfs server disk.
Once there... navigating to them with quicktime player and opening
results in a failure that (From windows Vista laptop) says:
error --43: A file could not be found (Welcome.mov)
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
Finally came to the reboot maintenance to reboot the x4540 to make
it see the newly replaced HDD.
I tried, reboot, then power-cycle, and reboot -- -r,
but I can not make the x4540 accept any HDD in that bay. I'm
starting to th
Thank you very much, this explains it perfectly.
I had been coming to the conclusion that the shared data must be what accounts
for the "missing" space, but previously my thinking/expectation was that it
would be "charged" against the snapshot in which the shared data first
appeared. Doing that
Hi Chris,
You might repost this query on desktop-discuss to find out
the status of the Access List tab.
Last I heard, it was being reworked.
Cindy
On 08/21/09 10:14, Chris wrote:
How do I get this in OpenSolaris 2009.06?
http://www.alobbs.com/albums/albun26/ZFS_acl_dialog1.jpg
thanks.
_
I won't be able to attend, but being subscribed to this list and the
storage list for a short while, the following topics would come to
mind:
- ZFS pool layout tips (not possible to grow RaidZ, proper planning,
when to not use RaidZ for high IOPS volumes etc.)
- how to best handle broken disks/con
Thanks for your reply Andrey,
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to see the files in that directory from any
of scenario's. It seems a zfs inside another zfs is causing the problem.
Of course when I put just a directory inside the zfs, everything can be
seen.
Cheers,
Greg
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, An
This is an odd question, to be certain, but I need to find out what size a 1.5
TB drive is to help me create a sparse/fake array.
Basically, if I could have someone do a dd if=<1.5 TB disk> of= and
then post the ls -l size of that file, it would greatly assist me.
Here's what I'm doing:
I hav
Gregory Skelton wrote:
I've tried changing all kinds of attributes for the zfs's, but I can't
seem to find the right configuration.
So I'm trying to move some zfs's under another, it looks like this:
/pool/joe_user move to /pool/homes/joe_user
You can do it in several ways:
1. Create a new F
That looks like it indeed. Output of zdb -
Object lvl iblk dblk lsize asize type
9516K 8K 150G 14.0G ZFS plain file
264 bonus ZFS znode
path???
Thanks for the help in clearing this up - satisfies my curiosity.
Hello all,
I've tried changing all kinds of attributes for the zfs's, but I can't
seem to find the right configuration.
So I'm trying to move some zfs's under another, it looks like this:
/pool/joe_user move to /pool/homes/joe_user
I know I can do this with zfs rename, and everything is fine
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:46:32AM -0700, Chris Murray wrote:
> Nico, what is a zero-link file, and how would I go about finding
> whether I have one? You'll have to bear with me, I'm afraid, as I'm
> still building my Solaris knowledge at the minute - I was brought up
> on Windows. I use Solaris f
> > Can you actually see the literal commands? A bit like MySQL's 'show
> > create table'? Or are you just intrepreting the output?
>
> Just interpreting the output.
Actually you could see the commands on the "old" server by using
zpool history oradata
Regards -- Volker
--
---
On Aug 21, 2009, at 4:13 AM, Felix Nielsen wrote:
thx will look into that, but would really to be able to "query"
something and get a result back with all "changes"
See the Solaris Administration Guide: Security Service for the section
on auditing.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-4557/a
On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Johan Eliasson wrote:
Got a curious message the other day.. that my tank is över 80% full
and that ZFS has deleted old backups to free up space. That's
curious since I'm not using the Time Slider for tank, only for
rpool...
So what exactly did it delete??
How do I get this in OpenSolaris 2009.06?
http://www.alobbs.com/albums/albun26/ZFS_acl_dialog1.jpg
thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
On Fri, August 21, 2009 11:18, David Magda wrote:
> The current default value ignores flush requests from guest OSes, but this
> can't tweaked via a parameter (11.1.3 Responding to guest IDE flush
> requests):
s/can't/can be/
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
On Fri, August 21, 2009 10:32, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Various people have stated here that VirtualBox intentionally does not
> pass through cache flush requests.
The current default value ignores flush requests from guest OSes, but this
can't tweaked via a parameter (11.1.3 Responding to guest
Sorry - didn't realised I'd replied only to you.
> You can either set the mountpoint property when you create the dataset or do
> it
> in a second operation after the create.
>
> Either:
> # zfs create -o mountpoint=/u01 rpool/u01
>
> or:
> # zfs create rpool/u01
> # zfs set mountpoint=/u01 rpool/
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I presume you've already installed your new server with the same rpool
>> configuration as your original, so you're asking how to recreate your two
>> other
>> pools.
>
> Correct - and also the mountpoints, which seem particulary confusing:
>
> -bash-3.00#
Yup try to see what the ouput of
# zdb - /
if you find big file(s) without pathname you are in ...
it should look like this :
...
Object lvl iblk dblk lsize asize type
6516K 128K 300G 70.0G ZFS plain file
264 bonus ZFS znode
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Johan Eliasson wrote:
So a full NTFS defrag should result in just a long sequential ZFS write?
That would depend on how the defrag algorithm works, how often NTFS
issues a synchronous write request (cache flush), how much memory is
installed on your Solaris system, and h
You can remove them by using fmthard(1M) instead of format(1M). This
allows full access to all 16 slices on x86.
Actually, if you want an exact copy of the VToC, grab the output of
prtvtoc(1M) from one disk, and send it into fmthard -s on the other
disk. (I've not tried this where EFI labels a
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
> On my new server I've inserted new 6 disks, run devfsadm and labelled
> them. I want to get the same set up as the previous, but can't for
> the life of me work out what I did. I can't find my notes, and the
> documentation is just confusing me.
>
> Can someone poin
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> An obvious item to cover is the new Flash Archive support as well as the
> changes to Live Upgrade due to zfs boot. Also, the benefits and issues
> associated with adding SSDs to the mix.
>
> Based on the last zfs talk I attended at a LISA, system administrators
> are lar
Thanks Trevor. Good to hear from you.
I needed to use '-e' to move forward. I think I was confused because
these sources seem to disagree on SMI vs. EFI labels for ZFS:
ZFS always uses EFI:
* "ZFS formats the disk using an EFI label to contain a single, large
slice" - no mention of any except
Hello,
It could be lack of sleep, but I can't work this out.
On one server (which I built about 6 months ago) I have this:
-bash-3.00# mount
/ on rpool/ROOT/s10s_u6wos_07b read/write/setuid/devices/dev=4010002
on Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
/devices on /devices read/write/setuid/devices/dev=510
Chris Murray wrote:
Nico, what is a zero-link file, and how would I go about finding whether I have
one? You'll have to bear with me, I'm afraid, as I'm still building my Solaris
knowledge at the minute - I was brought up on Windows. I use Solaris for my
storage needs now though, and slowly im
Nico, what is a zero-link file, and how would I go about finding whether I have
one? You'll have to bear with me, I'm afraid, as I'm still building my Solaris
knowledge at the minute - I was brought up on Windows. I use Solaris for my
storage needs now though, and slowly improving on my knowledg
Hi, I don't have means to replicate this issue nor file a bug about it so I'd
like your opinion about these issues or perhaps make bug report if necessary.
In scenario where is say three raidz2 groups consisting several disks, two
disks fail in different raidz-groups. You have degraded pool and
Nope, that it does not.
Ian Collins wrote:
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
Finally came to the reboot maintenance to reboot the x4540 to make it
see the newly replaced HDD.
I tried, reboot, then power-cycle, and reboot -- -r,
but I can not make the x4540 accept any HDD in that bay. I'm starting
t
thx will look into that, but would really to be able to "query" something and
get a result back with all "changes"
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/l
IF you run solaris and opensolaris ，for example you my use c0t0d0 (for scsi
disk) or c0d0 (for ide /SATA disk ) as the system disk.
In default ,solaris x86 and opensolaris will use RAW driver :
c0t0d0s0 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0) as the member driver of rpool.
Infact, solaris2 partition can be more th
Every time I attempt to import a particular RAID-Z pool, my system hangs.
Specifically, if I open up a gnome terminal and input '$ pfexec import zpool
mypool', the process will never complete and I will return to the prompt. If I
open up another terminal, I can input a 'zpool status" and see
On 20 Aug 2009, at 21:22, Felix Nielsen wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to get filesystem notification like when files are
created, modified, deleted? or can the "activity" be exported?
If you have a vscan service then that will get notified when files are
accessed or modified; would that be su
sai prasath wrote:
Hi
I have installed open solaris on HP Proliant ML 370 G6.While creating zones
I am getting error message for the following command.
#zfs create -o canmount=noauto rpool/ROOT/S10be/zones
cannot create 'rpool/ROOT/S10be/zones': parent does not exist.
what does "zfs list -r
Tony Pyro wrote:
I'm running into a problem trying to do "zfs receive", with data being
replicated from a Solaris 10 (11/06 release) to a storage server running OS 118. Here is
the error:
r...@lznas2:/backup# cat backup+mcc+use...@zn2---pre_messages_delete_20090430 |
zfs receive backup/mcc/u
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
Finally came to the reboot maintenance to reboot the x4540 to make it
see the newly replaced HDD.
I tried, reboot, then power-cycle, and reboot -- -r,
but I can not make the x4540 accept any HDD in that bay. I'm starting
to think that perhaps we did not lose the origin
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have my own application that uses large circular buffers and a socket
connection between hosts. The buffers keep data flowing during ZFS
writes and the direct connection cuts out ssh.
Application, as in not script (something you can share)?
Not yet!
--
Ian.
It was blogged about on Joyent Tim:
http://www.joyent.com/joyeurblog/2008/01/16/strongspace-and-bingodisk-update/
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6458218
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@
63 matches
Mail list logo
