On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> Ian Collins wrote:
>> Send/receive speeds appear to be very data dependent. I have several
>> different filesystems containing differing data types. The slowest to
>> replicate is mail and my guess it's the changes to the index files that
>
Ian Collins wrote:
> Send/receive speeds appear to be very data dependent. I have several
> different filesystems containing differing data types. The slowest to
> replicate is mail and my guess it's the changes to the index files that takes
> the time. Similar sized filesystems with similar
On Jan 9, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> I'm pretty darned sure that the LSI 1068-based HBAs will do "true"
> JBOD.
Indeed they do, and the mpt driver works fine with these cards.
/dale
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi James,
I set 'mpxio_disable = no' in the /kernel/drv/iscsi.conf file (not
/kernel/drv/scsi_vhci.h) and tried running
/usr/bin/stmsboot -e. It then listed the pci ids of the NICs, and I said yes
and rebooted. Still no joy.
At this point, I'm assuming that my Solaris/ZFS box is enabled for MPX
Ok, since this thread is the official spot for home based chatting, I am off
work now.
Similar feeling from an enterprise perspective --
I am the last person at work that has not even once, logged on to FaceBook.
[no need, I insist]
And I can do a zFaceBook on 100% zCode anytime, only if I wan
Hi B, thx for hitting on the expander issue that I need to finish your job -
On top of as Rich said, Sun sells many expander-based stuff,
please also understand why you even need that --
the LSI SAS HBA that Sun resells does up to over 200 JBOD disks by itself.
But the new HDS AMS2000 SAS implem
Orvar Korvar wrote:
> I have taken a Samsung 500GB from my old ZFS raid. I have created a 100GB
> Windows XP partition and installed WinXP. The rest of the disk is
> unformatted. And then I wanted to install SXCE b104, so I started the SXCE
> install with ZFS. But it refused to install. Said tha
I have taken a Samsung 500GB from my old ZFS raid. I have created a 100GB
Windows XP partition and installed WinXP. The rest of the disk is unformatted.
And then I wanted to install SXCE b104, so I started the SXCE install with ZFS.
But it refused to install. Said that the partitions overlap and
I'm trying to add some additional devices to my existing pool, but it's not
working. I'm adding a raidz group of 5 300 GB drives, but the command always
fails:
r...@kronos:/ # zpool add raid raidz c8t8d0 c8t13d0 c7t8d0 c3t8d0 c5t8d0
Assertion failed: nvlist_lookup_string(cnv, "path", &path) ==
I'm trying to add some additional devices to my existing pool, but it's not
working. I'm adding a raidz group of 5 300 GB drives, but the command always
fails:
r...@kronos:/ # zpool add raid raidz c8t8d0 c8t13d0 c7t8d0 c3t8d0 c5t8d0
Assertion failed: nvlist_lookup_string(cnv, "path", &path) ==
Brandon High wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
>
>> On 1/9/2009 8:21 AM, Will Murnane wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You might consider a case with a SAS expander in it; you can plug sata
>>>
>> Except Solaris still lacks support for port expanders, or did last I
>> ch
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:13:17PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
>
>> Jerry K wrote:
>>
>>> It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file
>>> systems integrated into the main source.
>>>
>>>
>> No ZFS crypto, but it has lofi crypto.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:25 PM, noz wrote:
> > The above is very dangerous, if it
> > will even work. The output of the zfs send is
> > redirected to /tmp, which is a ramdisk. If you
> > have enough space (RAM + Swap), it will work, but if
> > there is a reboot or crash before the zfs receive
>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:13:17PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
> Jerry K wrote:
> > It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file
> > systems integrated into the main source.
> >
>
> No ZFS crypto, but it has lofi crypto.You can use lofi for ZFS,
> though. Perhaps tha
Marcelo,
I just finished writing up my test results. Hopefully it will answer
most of your questions. You can find it in my blog, as permalink
http://blogs.sun.com/blogfinger/entry/zfs_and_the_uberblock_part
Regards,
Bernd
Marcelo Leal wrote:
>> Marcelo,
> Hello there...
>> I did some more
Jerry K wrote:
> It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file
> systems integrated into the main source.
>
No ZFS crypto, but it has lofi crypto.You can use lofi for ZFS,
though. Perhaps that was confusing?
-- richard
> In reviewing the Change logs (URL's below) I d
This is in the process of being resolved right now. Stay tuned
for when it will be available. It might be a patch to Update 6.
In the meantime, you might try this:
http://blogs.sun.com/scottdickson/entry/flashless_system_cloning_with_zfs
- Lori
On 01/09/09 12:28, Jerry K wrote:
> I understa
I understand that currently, at least under Solaris 10u6, it is not
possible to jumpstart a new system with a zfs root using a flash archive
as a source.
Can anyone comment as to whether this restriction will pass in the near
term, or if this is a while out (6+ months) before this will be possi
It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file
systems integrated into the main source.
In reviewing the Change logs (URL's below) I did not see anything
mentioned that this had come to pass. Its going to be another week
before I have a chance to play with b105.
Does anyone k
On 01/09/09 01:44, Ross wrote:
> Can I ask why we need to use -c or -d at all? We already have -r to
> recursively list children, can't we add an optional depth parameter to that?
>
> You then have:
> zfs list : shows current level (essentially -r 0)
> zfs list -r : shows all levels (infinite rec
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> On 1/9/2009 8:21 AM, Will Murnane wrote:
>
>> You might consider a case with a SAS expander in it; you can plug sata
>
> Except Solaris still lacks support for port expanders, or did last I
> checked. Has this changed?
A SAS expander is diffe
> "re" == Richard Elling writes:
re> Flash has been around for well over 25 years
there is NOR flash and NAND flash, though. I think NOR is 25 years
old, and MLC and SLC FLASH are both NAND right? NOR and NAND have
completely different behavior and implementation, and even within NAND
On Thu, January 8, 2009 15:35, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:43 PM, JZ wrote:
>>
>> Can we focus on commercial usage?
>> please!
> I dunno about you, but I need somewhere to store that music so I can
> stream
> it throughout the house while I'm drinking that wine ;) A single disk
> wind
On 1/9/2009 8:21 AM, Will Murnane wrote:
> You might consider a case with a SAS expander in it; you can plug sata
Except Solaris still lacks support for port expanders, or did last I
checked. Has this changed?
--
Carson
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
z
> The above is very dangerous, if it
> will even work. The output of the zfs send is
> redirected to /tmp, which is a ramdisk. If you
> have enough space (RAM + Swap), it will work, but if
> there is a reboot or crash before the zfs receive
> completes then everything is gone.
> In stead, do the
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 09:28, Erik Trimble wrote:
> I'm pretty darned sure that the LSI 1068-based HBAs will do "true"
> JBOD. Supermicro makes two such beasts: AOC-USAS-L8i and
> AOC-USASLP-L8i Both are 8-port PCI-Express x4 cards.
No, both are UIO cards. They're compatible with PCI expre
After having a think I've come up with the following hypothesis:
1) When I was on Solaris 10u4 things were working fine.
2) When I re-installed with Solaris 10u6 and imported the zpool (with zpool
import -f), it created a zpool.cache file and didn't update the on disk data
structures for some re
Could you explain if you did any specific configuration on the Areca Raid
controller other than setting it to Raid and manually marking every disk as
pass-trhough so that the disks are viewable from opensolaris?
I have an ARC-1680ix-16. I have tried two configurations. JBOD and RAID but
making
I'm pretty darned sure that the LSI 1068-based HBAs will do "true"
JBOD. Supermicro makes two such beasts: AOC-USAS-L8i and
AOC-USASLP-L8i Both are 8-port PCI-Express x4 cards.
The "low-cost" LSI SATA HBAs should also give you what you want. E.g.
LSISAS3081E-R These use the same fa
Why do they throw these fancy RAID-controllers at us when we have plenty CPU
force to do zfs mirror and even raidz1 and raidz2?
I have 12 SATA disks and would like to prepare to add 12 new internal SATA
disks to my home server.
The cabinet (Lian Li Modular Cube
http://www.microplex.no/aspx/prod
I wouldn't know which laptops (beside macbooks) that specifically support zfs,
but I'm sure with a little twiddling around and some general know-how, many a
system would operate the latest version of opensolaris. Driver support is
always my biggest worry.
Sent from my BlackBerry Bold®
http://
I wonder if your problem is related to mine:
(can't import zpool after upgrade to solaris 10u6 -
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=324994#324994).
What does zdb -l give you?
zdb -l /dev/dsk/c1d1
zdb -l /dev/dsk/c2d0
zdb -l /dev/dsk/c2d1
-Steve
--
This message posted from op
Joel Buckley wrote:
>
> Search "http://store.sun.com"; for the item that matches your
> needs and run with it. Sun currently has a promotion on X4150
> Servers... That will easily be able to serve NFS, SunRay,
> etc... to your home.
>
>
Do they come with free ear plugs for the family? :)
--
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:55 AM, hardware technician wrote:
> I want to create a separate home, shared, read/write zfs partition on a
> tri-boot OpenSolaris, Ubuntu, and CentOS system. I have successfully
> created and exported the zpools that I would like to use, in Ubuntu using
> zfs-fuse. Howe
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:10 AM, noz wrote:
>
> Here's my solution:
> (1) n...@holodeck:~# zpool create epool mirror c4t1d0 c4t2d0 c4t3d0
>
> n...@holodeck:~# zfs list
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> epool 69K 15.6G18K /epool
> rpool
35 matches
Mail list logo
