Am at the limit of my knowlage now.
google man zpool
UNAVAIL is coming up because the zpool was imported with the drive missing.
Try exporting the pool, rebooting then importing it with the drive connected.
UNAVAIL
The device could not be opened. If a pool is imported when a device was
unavail
here is the requested output of raidz_open2.d upon running a zpool status :-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/export/home/brett# ./raidz_open2.d
run 'zpool import' to generate trace
60027449049959 BEGIN RAIDZ OPEN
60027449049959 config asize = 4000755744768
60027449049959 config ashift = 9
60027507681841 chil
Julius Roberts wrote:
>>> How do i compile mbuffer for our system,
>
> Thanks to Mike Futerko for help with the compile, i now have it installed OK.
>
>>> and what syntax to i use to invoke it within the zfs send recv?
>
> Still looking for answers to this one? Any example syntax, gotchas
> et
>> How do i compile mbuffer for our system,
Thanks to Mike Futerko for help with the compile, i now have it installed OK.
>> and what syntax to i use to invoke it within the zfs send recv?
Still looking for answers to this one? Any example syntax, gotchas
etc would be much appreciated.
--
Ki
is there anyway to use zdb to simply remove those vdevs since they arent active
members of the pool?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-di
the disk passes sector by sector write tests both with the vendor diag and
seatools, the cable failed as soon as i tried it in another machine. the disk
is good, the cable was not. it also shows up in format just fine and it has the
same partition layout as all the other disks in the pool. zpool
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:28:36 -0500
Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian, Tim, again, thank you very much in answering my question.
>
> I am a bit disappointed that the whole discussion group does not have
> one person to stand up and say "yeah, OpenSolaris absolutely
> outperforms Linux a
>
> ACL's seemed a good solution since it leaves the overall ownership
> and permissions of the device the same, but just adds the gdm user as
> having permission to access the device as needed. Is there any way to
> get this same sort of behavior when using ZFS.
>
I think you may have misunde
js.lists , or anyone else who is using a XFX MDA72P7509 Motherboard ---
that onboard NIC is a Marvell? - Do you choose not to use it in favor of the
Intel PCI NIC?
Marvell provides Solaris 10 x86/x64 drivers on their website, I was hoping the
Marvell works in Opensolaris, because 97% of the AMD
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008, Joseph Zhou wrote:
>
> Please keep in mind that OpenSolaris and ZFS don't need to be the greatest
> technology today, and we need to respect the older generation engineers'
> thoughts -- it's an evolution of transfering enterprise capabilities to
> industry-standard solutions --
Yes, yes, Torrey, that's why I like you!
You are getting there -- the argument of snopshot is not key in its absolute
elegance, but what it does in the overall solution. When you are talking
about PiT with ADM, it made more sense, didn't it?
Please keep in mind that OpenSolaris and ZFS don't ne
zpool replace data 11342560969745958696 c0t2d0 that might replace the drive BUT
you will have to sort out the hardware error first.
For now forget about zfs and what is says about the zpool status. Concentrate
on fixing the hardware error. Use the manufacturs drive check boot CD to check
the dr
Mark/Tomas/Miles:
Thanks for the information. Unfortunately, using chmod/chown does not
seem a workable solution to me, unless I am missing something. Normally
logindevperm(4) is used for managing the ownership and permissions of
device files (like the audio device), and if the GDM daemon just
On Mon 08/12/08 09:14 , Torrey McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
> Ian Collins wrote:
> > Or through the APIs provided by libzfs.
> I'm not sure if those are published/supported as opposed to just being
> readable in the source. I think the ADM project is the droid we're
> looking for.
>
Fair po
Ian Collins wrote:
>
> On Mon 08/12/08 08:14 , Torrey McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
>
>> I'm pretty sure I understand the importance of a snapshot API. (You take
>> the snap, then you do the backup or whatever) My point is that, at
>> least on my quick read, you can do most of the same t
On Mon 08/12/08 08:14 , Torrey McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
> I'm pretty sure I understand the importance of a snapshot API. (You take
> the snap, then you do the backup or whatever) My point is that, at
> least on my quick read, you can do most of the same things with the ZFS
> command
I'm pretty sure I understand the importance of a snapshot API. (You take
the snap, then you do the backup or whatever) My point is that, at
least on my quick read, you can do most of the same things with the ZFS
command line utilities. The relevant question would then be how stable
that is
Well you would think that would be the case, but the behavior is the same
whether the disk is physically present or not. I can even use cfgadm to
unconfigure the deevice and the pool will stay in the same state and not let me
offline/detach/replace the vdev. also I don't have any spare ports
un
hi,
--- replacing UNAVAIL 0 543 0 insufficient replicas
-- 17096229131581286394 FAULTED 0 581 0 was /dev/dsk/c0t2d0s0/old
-- 11342560969745958696 FAULTED [u][b]0 582 0[/b][/u] was /dev/dsk/c0t2d0s0
Looking at that, i dont think you have fixed the original fault. Its still
getting write e
On 07 December, 2008 - Johan Hartzenberg sent me these 6,3K bytes:
> For what it is worth, have a look at my ZFS feature wishlist / AKA what it
> would take to make ZFS _THE_ last word in storage management:
> http://initialprogramload.blogspot.com/2008/07/zfs-missing-features.html
#2 can kinda b
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Aaron Blew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've done some basic testing with a X4150 machine using 6 disks in a RAID 5
> and RAID Z configuration. They perform very similarly, but RAIDZ definitely
> has more system overhead. In many cases this won't be a big deal, bu
Folks,
For those of you who haven't had time to follow the Open Solaris
project,
I recommend the this excellent screen cast. Of particular interest to
this list
is how ZFS is used to implement a version of Apple's "Time Machine".
http://webcast-west.sun.com/interactive/09B12437/index.html
Ed
22 matches
Mail list logo
