Oh cool, that's great news. Thanks Eric.
> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:50:08 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Mirrors braindead?
>
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:42:57A
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:08:13PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> Scott Williamson wrote:
> > Speaking of this, is there a list anywhere that details what we can
> > expect to see for (zfs) updates in S10U6?
>
> The official release name is "Solaris 10 10/08"
Ooops - no beta this time?
Regards,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:35:47AM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
>The reason why the (implicit) truncation could be taking long might be due
>to
>6723423 [6]UFS slow following large file deletion with fix for 6513858
>installed
>
>To overcome this problem for S10, the offe
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:42:57AM -0700, Ross wrote:
>
> Running "zpool status" is a complete no no if your array is degraded
> in any way. This is capable of locking up zfs even when it would
> otherwise have recovered itself. If you had zpool status hang, this
> probably happened to you.
FYI
kristof wrote:
> I don't know if this is already available in S10 10/08, but in opensolaris
> build> 71 you can set the:
>
> zpool failmode property
>
> see:
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/567/
>
> available options are:
>
> The property can be set to one of three option
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2008 01:10:51 PM:
> I don't know if this is already available in S10 10/08, but in
> opensolaris build > 71 you can set the:
>
> zpool failmode property
>
> see:
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/567/
>
> available options are:
>
> The proper
As far as I can tell, it all comes down to whether ZFS detects the failure
properly, and what commands you use as it's recovering.
Running "zpool status" is a complete no no if your array is degraded in any
way. This is capable of locking up zfs even when it would otherwise have
recovered itse
I don't know if this is already available in S10 10/08, but in opensolaris
build > 71 you can set the:
zpool failmode property
see:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/567/
available options are:
The property can be set to one of three options: "wait", "continue",
or "panic"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2008 10:59:06 AM:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>
> >> Wouldn't it be great if programmers could just focus on writing
> >> code rather than having to worry about getting sued over whether
> >> someone else is able or not to make a derivative p
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>> Wouldn't it be great if programmers could just focus on writing
>> code rather than having to worry about getting sued over whether
>> someone else is able or not to make a derivative program from their
>> code?
>
> Yep, but in THIS world it *i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes -- file based and derivative code based (copy covered code to a
> new file and that file is now covered). New code in a new file is not
> automatically covered and the authors choice. That said, if they have
> added dedup to zfs they may have taken extraordin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2008 07:15:46 AM:
> Hello Wade,
>
> Monday, October 6, 2008, 8:56:12 PM, you wrote:
>
> WSfc> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/06/2008 01:57:10
PM:
>
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> In another thread a short while ago.. A cool little movie with some
> >> gumballs was all we got
>Some people wrote:
>
>>
>> > covered code. Since Sun owns that code they would need to rattle the
>> > cage. Sun? Anyone have any talks with these guys yet?
>>
>> Isn't CDDL file based so they could implement all the new functionality in
>>
>>
>Wouldn't it be great if programmers could just f
Some people wrote:
>
> > covered code. Since Sun owns that code they would need to rattle the
> > cage. Sun? Anyone have any talks with these guys yet?
>
> Isn't CDDL file based so they could implement all the new functionality in
>
>
Wouldn't it be great if programmers could just focus on writ
Hello Wade,
Monday, October 6, 2008, 8:56:12 PM, you wrote:
WSfc> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/06/2008 01:57:10 PM:
>> Hi all
>>
>> In another thread a short while ago.. A cool little movie with some
>> gumballs was all we got to learn about green-bytes. The product
>> launched and maybe some
I recently ran into a problem for the second time with ZFS mirrors. I mirror
between two different physical arrays for some of my data. One array (SE3511)
had a catastrophic failure and was unresponsive. Thus, according to the ZFS in
s10u3 it just basically waits for the array to come back and h
Hello Nicolas,
Monday, October 6, 2008, 10:51:58 PM, you wrote:
NW> I'm pretty sure that local RAM beats remote-anything, no matter what the
NW> "anything" (as long as it isn't RAM) and what the protocol to get to it
NW> (as long as it isn't a normal backplane). (You could claim with NUMA
NW> me
Hi all,
Please keep me on cc: since I am not subscribed to either lists.
I have a weird problem with my OpenSolaris 2008.05 installation (build
96) on my Ultra 20 workstation.
For some reason, ZFS has been confused and has recently starting to
believe that my zpool is using a device which doe
Yeah, I was scoping an Intel board - only one I could find had 8 SATA.
However, couldn't find much info on support for those either. For this
machine I need 16 ports and want 8 onboard SATA. It shouldn't be
difficult, but I don't want to order something, find out it's not
compatible, and have to r
2008/10/6 mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am trying to finish building a system and I kind of need to pick
> working NIC and onboard SATA chipsets (video is not a big deal - I can
> get a silent PCIe card for that, I already know one which works great)
>
> I need 8 onboard SATA. I would prefer Intel
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> ZFS is licensed under the CDDL, and as far as I know does not require
>> derivative works to be open source. It's truly free like the BSD license in
>> that companies can take CDDL code, modify it, and keep the content closed.
>> Th
21 matches
Mail list logo
