[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes -- file based and derivative code based (copy covered code to a
> new file and that file is now covered). New code in a new file is not
> automatically covered and the authors choice. That said, if they have
> added dedup to zfs they may have taken extraordinary steps to segment their
> code from covered code. My hunch is they did not. Everything from
> resilver, zil etc would need to be dedup aware. Either case, release the
> required code and there is no harm no foul right? If it is stubs, then so
> be it. I am more interested to see if they implemented it the same way I
> started to or if it is something new. If it is code complete and all
> covered even better.
If the code in a new file is derived from code in a file covered by the CDDL,
it may be that you need to provide this code under CDDL too.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
