Jim Dunham wrote:
[...]
Jim, at first: I never said that AVS is a bad product. And I never will.
I wonder why you act as if you were attacked personally.
To be honest, if I were a customer with the original question, such a
reaction wouldn't make me feel safer.
>> - ZFS is not aware of AVS
Ralf,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> War wounds? Could you please expand on the why a bit more?
>
> - ZFS is not aware of AVS. On the secondary node, you'll always have
> to
> force the `zfs import` due to the unnoticed changes of metadata (zpool
> in use).
This is not true. If on the pr
Jorgen,
>
> If we get two x4500s, and look at AVS, would it be possible to:
>
> 1) Setup AVS to replicate zfs, and zvol (ufs) from 01 -> 02 ?
> Supported
> by Sol 10 5/08 ?
For Solaris 10, one will need to purchase AVS. It was not until
OpenSolaris, that AVS became bundled. Also the OpenSolar
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 15:08, Bob Friesenhahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should mention that if copying the file causes it to be nicely
> compressed, then you can use this to your advantage. Your log-file
> rotator can copy the file and delete the original rather than just
> renaming it. You
Hi there!
I made a dumb but serious error:
I have a 500G external usb disk with a zfs-pool containing only this one disk.
I then installed a new OS on my host-computer (debian with zfs-fuse) and wanted
to access my usb-drive again. I know now that ZFS saves the pool-data on the
filesystem - bu
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> If the problem is due to the "trickle factor" then you should see that
> if you copy a large log file that the filesystem now shows that some
> data is compressed.
I should mention that if copying the file causes it to be nicely
compressed, then you ca
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Kenny wrote:
>
> So I enable the lzjb compression feature and start poring in syslog
> files. However the problem appears that the files are not
> compressing. A zfs get all command shows compression is "on". My
> compressratio reports 1.00 and the files are the same size
> Exporting them as one huge iSCSI volume is good if you're paranoid about data
> loss. You can use raid5 or 6 on the Linux servers, and then mirror those
> large volumes with ZFS. The downside is that it's much harder to add
> storage. I don't know if iSCSI volumes can be expanded, so you mi
Great to hear the driver works, I'll cross my fingers that my cards eventually
turn up.
I'm pretty sure I read something about work being done on ZFS to smooth out
those lumpy writes, I'm not 100% sure it's the same problem but it did sound
very similar. I can't remember the RFE / bug number o
I was looking into something like that last year, I was mirroring two iSCSI
drives using ZFS. The only real problem I found was that ZFS hangs the pool
for 3 minutes if an iSCSI device gets disconnected, unfortunately ZFS waits
for the iSCSI timeout before it realises something has happened.
10 matches
Mail list logo
