Has anyone here had any luck using a CF to SATA adapter?
I've just tried an Addonics ADSACFW CF to SATA adaptor with an 8GB card that I
wanted to use for a boot pool and even though the BIOS reports the disk,
Solaris B95 (or the installer) doesn't see it.
I might give the IDE version a go (I re
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 08:15:56PM -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
>
>> We are currently investigating adding more functionality to libsec to
>> provide many of the things you desire. We will have iterators, editing
>> capabilities and so on.
>>
>
> I'm still iro
Thanks to all of you for the help.
-Ivan
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 10:56, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Ivan Ordonez wrote:
> >
> > I would like to get your opinion on what is the best way to setup the
> > machine using ZFS on all drives and partitions. I want to use Zones,
> > Live U
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Ivan Ordonez wrote:
>
> I would like to get your opinion on what is the best way to setup the
> machine using ZFS on all drives and partitions. I want to use Zones,
> Live Upgrade and Virtualbox in the future.
>
> The machine is SUN Ultra 40 M2 with 6G of RAM, 2 dual core AMD
Hi Ivan,
If you are asking how you can make a ZFS root file system on a Solaris
10 system, then you'll need to wait a bit until that release is
available.
This features is currently provided in the SXCE, build 90 release,
which provides similar support. You can read more about this support
here:
Hello,
Thanks for your help. I will give it a shot. Does anyone know how can
I make the filesystem ZFS instead of the default UFS?
Thanks,
-Ivan
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 10:40, Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
> I had recently got the mirroring part of it resolved.
> Here's the steps I took:
> http://
I had recently got the mirroring part of it resolved.
Here's the steps I took:
http://malsserver.blogspot.com/2008/08/mirroring-resolved-correct-way.html
Malachi
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Ordonez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a total newbie to Solaris administration.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 08:15:56PM -0600, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> We are currently investigating adding more functionality to libsec to
> provide many of the things you desire. We will have iterators, editing
> capabilities and so on.
I'm still ironing a design/architecture document out. I'l
Hi all,
I'm a total newbie to Solaris administration. Please be patient.
I would like to get your opinion on what is the best way to setup the
machine using ZFS on all drives and partitions. I want to use Zones,
Live Upgrade and Virtualbox in the future.
The machine is SUN Ultra 40 M2 with 6
Just tried with a fresh install from the OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_95 CD and it
works fine.
Thanks
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/
Borys Saulyak wrote:
> May I remind you that I issue occurred on Solaris 10, not on OpenSolaris.
>
>
I believe you. If you review the life cycle of a bug,
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hubs/documentation/patch/patch-docs/abugslife.pdf
then you will recall that bugs are fixed in NV and then
back
Joe Blount wrote:
> Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
>> Joe Blount wrote:
> Is the acl_t intentionally designed to be opaque?
>
Yes, its meant to be opaque.
The layout of the acl_t will likely change in the not too distant
future.
>>> Will old versions be supported?
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> Joe Blount wrote:
>>
Is the acl_t intentionally designed to be opaque?
>>>
>>> Yes, its meant to be opaque.
>>>
>>> The layout of the acl_t will likely change in the not too distant
>>> future.
>>>
>>
>> Will old versions be supported? For example, if A
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> jan damborsky wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I like this idea - it would be clear solution for the problem.
>> Is it possible to manage custom parameters with standard CLI
>> commands (these are used by the installer for manipulating ZFS
>> entities) - zpool(1M), zfs(1M), ... ?
>
This panic message seems consistent with bugid 6322646, which was
fixed in NV b77 (post S10u5 freeze).
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6322646
-- richard
Borys Saulyak wrote:
>> From what I can predict, and *nobody* has provided
>> any panic
>> essages to confirm, ZF
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> jan damborsky wrote:
>>> zfs set caiman:install=preparing rpool/ROOT
>> That sounds reasonable. It is not atomic operation from installer
>> point of view, but the time window is really short (installer can
>> set ZFS user property almost immediately after pool is creat
jan damborsky wrote:
>> zfs set caiman:install=preparing rpool/ROOT
>
> That sounds reasonable. It is not atomic operation from installer
> point of view, but the time window is really short (installer can
> set ZFS user property almost immediately after pool is created).
Not it isn't but thi
Hi Andrew,
this is what I am thinking about based on John's
and Darren's responses.
I will file RFE for having possibility to set user
properties for pools (if it doesn't already exist).
Thank you,
Jan
andrew wrote:
> Perhaps user properties on pools would be useful here? At present only ZFS
Hi Darren,
thank you very much for your help.
Please see my comments below.
Jan
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> jan damborsky wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I like this idea - it would be clear solution for the problem.
>> Is it possible to manage custom parameters with standard CLI
>> commands (these are u
Perhaps user properties on pools would be useful here? At present only ZFS
filesystems can have user properties - not pools. Not really an immediate
solution to your problem though.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-d
We do this all the time SRDF with zfs. Zones built on R!-R2 pairs as are the
application disks. Fast failover and some intelligence with scripts checking
that a resync has been completed before we failback.
v
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Ian Collins wrote:
> Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
>> Ian Collins wrote:
>>> I have a pretty standard ZFS boot AMD64 desktop. A the moment, most ZFS
>>> related commands are hanging (can't be killed) . Running 'truss share'
>>> the last few lines I see are:
>>>
>> Can you provide a kernel thread list r
jan damborsky wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I like this idea - it would be clear solution for the problem.
> Is it possible to manage custom parameters with standard CLI
> commands (these are used by the installer for manipulating ZFS
> entities) - zpool(1M), zfs(1M), ... ?
>
> I am asking, since I haven
Hi Robert, et.al.,
I have blogged about a method I used to recover a removed file from a
zfs file system
at http://mbruning.blogspot.com.
Be forewarned, it is very long...
All comments are welcome.
max
Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello max,
>
> Sunday, August 17, 2008, 1:02:05 PM, you wrote:
>
> m
You may also need to just boot to safe mode and manually import the root
pool to mount on /a, then reboot as this updates the device path stored in
the pool's on-disk meta-data. If you search for my posts you will find
plenty discussions about my adventures with this.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:54
Hi John,
I like this idea - it would be clear solution for the problem.
Is it possible to manage custom parameters with standard CLI
commands (these are used by the installer for manipulating ZFS
entities) - zpool(1M), zfs(1M), ... ?
I am asking, since I haven't found information about setting
cu
> From what I can predict, and *nobody* has provided
> any panic
> essages to confirm, ZFS likely had difficulty
> writing. For Solaris 10u5
Panic stack is looking pretty much the same as panic on imprt, and cannot be
correlated to write failure:
Aug 5 12:01:27 omases11 unix: [ID 836849 kern.no
27 matches
Mail list logo
