The Realtek chipset I was using was RTL8111B on an Asus P5B, which is the same
"family" as yours, so I don't think you can rule out the network. Give the gani
driver a shot.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-d
Yes I saw somewhere in the forums about this. do you know what chipset was it?.
Mine is RTL8111/8168B.
As i said in my previous post I'm getting ~85 Mb/s.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.
Yes i tried using iperf. I'm getting ~85 Mb/sec. That rules out network as
suspect.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I've had issues with the rge driver. Write TO the zfs box was good, but read
FROM was terrible. Granted, this was likely a different Realtek chipset as mine
was gigabit, but it could be having the same issue. Try the gani driver (use
Google to find).
Cheers,
Chris
This message posted fro
i have valid vnode , got after create and it has valid fields such as
type,zfsvfsp etc. and i do get znode pointer by doing VTOZ.
i need inode for my application .
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@open
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Anil Jangity wrote:
> I plan to have 3 disks and am debating what I should do with them, if I
> should do a
> raidz (single or double parity) or just a mirror.
>
> With the # of reads below, I don't see any reason why I should consider
> that. I would like to
> proceed with do
vijay Rajah wrote:
> I'm setting up a home file server on opensolaris b86
> My system is running with AMD Athlon 4400+, 1GB ram, rge 100Mb/s ethernet
>
> I'm able to create the CIFS shares and able to access the data from my
> windows laptop. Now, when i try to stream some HD video the performac
Hello Brian,
Thursday, June 19, 2008, 3:44:01 AM, you wrote:
BH> A three-way mirror and three disks in a double parity array are going to
get you
BH> the same usable space. They are going to get you the same level of
redundancy.
BH> The only difference is that the RAIDZ2 is going to consume a
> Hi all,
>
> here are some questions about ZFS asked by a top customer
>
>
> When accessing to RAW volumes under ZFS do we go through cache or not?
> If yes can we disable it?
> They use Veritas QuickIO (ODM) and they want to compare with ZFS and
> also ZFS with and without cache.
>
> Do we have