-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darren J Moffat wrote:
| Great tool, any chance we can have it integrated into zpool(1M) so that
| it can find and "fixup" on import detached vdevs as new pools ?
|
| I'd think it would be reasonable to extend the meaning of
| 'zpool import -D' to list
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:59 PM, EchoB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot recall if it was this (-discuss) or (-code) but a post a few
> months ago caught my attention.
> In it someone detailed having worked out the math and algorithms for a
> flexible expansion scheme for ZFS. Clearly this is
I cannot recall if it was this (-discuss) or (-code) but a post a few
months ago caught my attention.
In it someone detailed having worked out the math and algorithms for a
flexible expansion scheme for ZFS. Clearly this is very exciting to me,
and most people who use ZFS on purpose.
I am wonder
On 05/08/2008 11:29 AM, Luke Scharf wrote:
> Dave wrote:
>> On 05/08/2008 08:11 AM, Ross wrote:
>>
>>> It may be an obvious point, but are you aware that snapshots need to
>>> be stopped any time a disk fails? It's something to consider if
>>> you're planning frequent snapshots.
>>>
>>
>>
On May 8, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> Luke Scharf wrote:
>> Dave wrote:
>>> On 05/08/2008 08:11 AM, Ross wrote:
>>>
It may be an obvious point, but are you aware that snapshots need
to be stopped any time a disk fails? It's something to consider
if you're plannin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/08/2008 02:31:43 PM:
> Luke Scharf wrote:
> > Dave wrote:
> >> On 05/08/2008 08:11 AM, Ross wrote:
> >>
> >>> It may be an obvious point, but are you aware that snapshots
> need to be stopped any time a disk fails? It's something to
> consider if you're planning freq
Luke Scharf wrote:
> Dave wrote:
>> On 05/08/2008 08:11 AM, Ross wrote:
>>
>>> It may be an obvious point, but are you aware that snapshots need to be
>>> stopped any time a disk fails? It's something to consider if you're
>>> planning frequent snapshots.
>>>
>> I've never heard this bef
Marcelo Leal wrote:
> No answer... well, do you not have this problem or there is another option to
> delegate such administration? I was thinking if we can delegate a "single"
> filesystem administration to some user through ZFS administration web console
> (67889).
> Can i create a user and
Marcelo Leal wrote:
> No answer... well, do you not have this problem or there is another option to
> delegate such administration? I was thinking if we can delegate a "single"
> filesystem administration to some user through ZFS administration web console
> (67889).
> Can i create a user and
No answer... well, do you not have this problem or there is another option to
delegate such administration? I was thinking if we can delegate a "single"
filesystem administration to some user through ZFS administration web console
(67889).
Can i create a user and give him administration rights
Mike DeMarco wrote:
> I currently have a zpool with two 8Gbyte disks in it. I need to replace them
> with a single 56Gbyte disk.
>
> with veritas I would just add the disk in as a mirror and break off the other
> plex then destroy it.
>
> I see no way of being able to do this with zfs.
>
> Being
I currently have a zpool with two 8Gbyte disks in it. I need to replace them
with a single 56Gbyte disk.
with veritas I would just add the disk in as a mirror and break off the other
plex then destroy it.
I see no way of being able to do this with zfs.
Being able to migrate data without having
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008, Ross wrote:
>
>
>> protected even if a disk fails. I found this post quite an
>> interesting
>> read:http://blogs.sun.com/relling/entry/raid_recommendations_space_vs_mttdl
>>
>
> Richard's blog entry does not tell the whole story. ZFS does not
hello
thank you for your postings. i try to understood. but my english is not so
good. :-)
for exporting a zfs i must use a special command like
zspool export
this makes the filesystem ready to export.
but i think so:
when i boot from the live cd without mounting/activating the file system , the
Dave wrote:
> On 05/08/2008 08:11 AM, Ross wrote:
>
>> It may be an obvious point, but are you aware that snapshots need to be
>> stopped any time a disk fails? It's something to consider if you're
>> planning frequent snapshots.
>>
>
> I've never heard this before. Why would snapshots n
On 05/08/2008 08:11 AM, Ross wrote:
> It may be an obvious point, but are you aware that snapshots need to be
> stopped any time a disk fails? It's something to consider if you're planning
> frequent snapshots.
I've never heard this before. Why would snapshots need to be stopped for
a disk fai
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Ross Smith wrote:
> True, but I'm seeing more and more articles pointing out that the
> risk of a secondary failure is increasing as disks grow in size, and
Quite true.
> While I'm not sure of the actual error rates (Western digital list
> their unrecoverable rates as < 1 i
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Ross wrote:
> protected even if a disk fails. I found this post quite an
> interesting
> read:http://blogs.sun.com/relling/entry/raid_recommendations_space_vs_mttdl
Richard's blog entry does not tell the whole story. ZFS does not
protect against memory corruption errors an
Mirrored drives should be fine. My understanding is that write performance
suffers slightly in a mirrored configuration, but random reads are much faster.
In your scenario I would expect mirroring to give far superior performance
than raid-z2.
We're looking to do something similar, but we're
> Steve,
>
> > Can someone tell me or point me to links that
> describe how to
> > do the following.
> >
> > I had a machine that crashed and I want to move to
> a newer machine
> > anyway. The boot disk on the old machine is fried.
> The two disks I
> was
> using for a zfs pool on that machi
Hi Hans,
Think what you are looking for would be a combination of a snapshot
and zfs send/receive, that would give you an archive that you can use
to recreate your zfs filesystems on your zpool at will at later time.
So you can do something like this
Create archive :
zfs snapshot -r [EMAIL
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Paul B. Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have been evaluating ZFS as a potential solution for delivering
> enterprise file services for our campus.
...
> I was thinking about allocating 2 drives for the OS (SVM mirroring, pending
> ZFS boot support), two hot
Hans,
> hello,
> can i create a image from ZFS with the DD command?
Yes, with restrictions.
First, a ZFS storage pool must be in the "zpool export" state to be
copied, so that a write-order consistent set of data exists in the
copy. ZFS does an excellent job of detecting inconsistencies in t
Hello Darren,
Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 11:16:25 AM, you wrote:
DJM> Great tool, any chance we can have it integrated into zpool(1M) so that
DJM> it can find and "fixup" on import detached vdevs as new pools ?
I remember long time ago some posts about 'zpool split' so one could
split a pool in two (
24 matches
Mail list logo
