[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/08/2008 02:31:43 PM: > Luke Scharf wrote: > > Dave wrote: > >> On 05/08/2008 08:11 AM, Ross wrote: > >> > >>> It may be an obvious point, but are you aware that snapshots > need to be stopped any time a disk fails? It's something to > consider if you're planning frequent snapshots. > >>> > >> I've never heard this before. Why would snapshots need to be stopped for > >> a disk failure? > >> > > > > Because taking a snapshot makes the scrub start over. I hadn't thought
> > about this extending to a resilver, but I guess it would! > > I thought this was fixed in OpenSolaris and Solaris 10 U5? Can one of > the ZFS folks please comment? > > I'll probably get to test this the hard way next week, as I start to > attempt to engineer a zfs send/recv DR solution. If this bug _isn't_ > fixed, I will be a very unhappy geek :-( > Sorry to hear you are unhappy. =( It is not fixed yet -- I am actively looking for the fix too. On a 4500 with a lot of used data on a large pool, you can expect to lose snapshots for 5+ days to resilver or scrub. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
