On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Marion Hakanson wrote:
>> # pkgadd -d .
>> pkgadd: ERROR: no packages were found in
>>
>> # ls
>> install/ pkginfo pkgmapreloc/
>> . . .
>
> Um, "cd .." and "pkgadd -d ." again. The package is the actual directory
> that you unpacked. Note the instructions for unpac
Nice putrid spew of FUD regarding 3Ware cards.
Regarding the SuperMicro 8-port SATA PCI-X card, yes, that is a good
recommendation.
-=dave
- Original Message -
From: Rob Windsor
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> This is what I get with the filebench-1.1.0_x86_pkg.tar.gz from SourceForge:
>
> # pkgadd -d .
> pkgadd: ERROR: no packages were found in
>
> # ls
> install/ pkginfo pkgmapreloc/
> . . .
Um, "cd .." and "pkgadd -d ." again. The package is the actual directory
http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/x4500_solaris_zfs_iscsi_perfect
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:44 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> It would be useful if people here who have used iSCSI on top of ZFS
> could share their performance experiences. It is very easy to waste a
> lot of time trying to r
It would be useful if people here who have used iSCSI on top of ZFS
could share their performance experiences. It is very easy to waste a
lot of time trying to realize unrealistic expectations. Hopefully
iSCSI on top of ZFS normally manages to transfer much more than
5MB/second!
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> It may not be relevant, but I've seen ZFS add weird delays to things too. I
> deleted a file to free up space, but when I checked no more space was
> reported. A second or two later the space appeared.
Run the "sync" command before you do the "du". That flushes the AR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm creating a zfs volume, and sharing it with "zfs set shareiscsi=on
> poolname/volume". I can access the iSCSI volume without any problems, but IO
> is terribly slow, as in five megabytes per second sustained transfers.
>
> I've tried creating an iSCSI target stored on
Max Bruning wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>> while trying to figure out what on earth has been
>> going on in my u20m2 due to
>>
>> 6636511 u20m2 bios version 1.45.1 still can't
>> distinguish disks on sata channel #1,
>>
>> I engaged in a lot of cable swapping operations for
>> the internal sata drive c
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Marion Hakanson wrote:
>
> I've installed and run filebench (version 1.1.0) from the SourceForge
> packages on Solaris-10 here, both SPARC and x86_64, with no problems.
> Looks like I downloaded it 23-Jan-2008.
This is what I get with the filebench-1.1.0_x86_pkg.tar.gz from
S
>
> Hi everybody,
> while trying to figure out what on earth has been
> going on
> in my u20m2 due to
>
> 6636511 u20m2 bios version 1.45.1 still can't
> distinguish disks on sata
> channel #1,
>
> I engaged in a lot of cable swapping operations for
> the internal
> sata drive cables.
>
> Some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Some of us are still using Solaris 10 since it is the version of Solaris
> released and supported by Sun. The 'filebench' software from SourceForge
> does not seem to install or work on Solaris 10. The 'pkgadd' command
> refuses to recognize the package, even when it
Hello All-
I've been creating iSCSI targets on the following two boxes:
- Sun Ultra 40 M2 with eight 10K SATA disks
- Sun x2200 M2, with two 15K RPM SAS drives
Both were running build 82
I'm creating a zfs volume, and sharing it with "zfs set shareiscsi=on
poolname/volume". I can access the iSCSI
Start with the man page for zfs(1m), specifically, the recordsize parameter.
More discussion is available on the Solaris Internals ZFS Best Practices
Guide.
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide
-- richard
Marcel Guerin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We’re doing some benchm
btw, my machine doesn't have a dns name so i had to enter a phony one to get
nfs/server online
can that have any ill effects?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.o
that doesn't work
it looks like something maybe corrupt, maybe something didn't get installed
properly or i have a bad disc, for some reason my share command doesn't have an
-F option
i'm going to get a new disc and reinstall everything
thanks for the help everyone
This message posted from
Hi,
We're doing some benchmarking at a customer (using IOzone) and for some
specific small block random tests, performance of their X4500 is very
poor (~1.2 MB/s aggregate throughput for a 5+1 RAIDZ). Specifically,
the test is the IOzone multithreaded throughput test of an 8GB file size
and 8K
Thanks for the suggestions. I re-created the pool, set the record size to 8K,
re-created the file and increased the I/O size from the application. It's
nearly all writes now.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
z
In this particular case will 127729-07 contain all the bug fixes in
IDR127787-12 (or later?). I have also run into a few other kernel
panics addressed in earlier revisions of this IDR but I am eager
to get back on the main Sol10 branch.
Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:45:46PM -0800, Prabahar J
On Feb 19, 2008, at 17:27, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Peter Karlsson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I got my MacBook pro set up to dual boot between Solaris and OSX and
>> I have created a zpool to use as a shred storage for documents etc..
>> However got this strange thing when trying to access the zpool fro
On Feb 16, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Some of us are still using Solaris 10 since it is the version of
> Solaris released and supported by Sun. The 'filebench' software from
> SourceForge does not seem to install or work on Solaris 10. The
> 'pkgadd' command refuses to recognize
Thanks everybody :)
The solution i'm using now is the one where i backup to the usb disk and settle
for a mirror on the two smaller disks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.
> I've just put my first ZFS into production, and users are complaining about
> some regressions.
>
> One problem for them is that now, they can't see all the users directories in
> the automount point: the homedirs used to be part of a single UFS, and were
> browsable with the correct autofs op
Hi all,
I've just put my first ZFS into production, and users are complaining about
some regressions.
One problem for them is that now, they can't see all the users directories in
the automount point: the homedirs used to be part of a single UFS, and were
browsable with the correct autofs opti
Peter Karlsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got my MacBook pro set up to dual boot between Solaris and OSX and I
> have created a zpool to use as a shred storage for documents etc..
> However got this strange thing when trying to access the zpool from
> Solaris, only root can see it?? I created the zp
Hi, Jason,
Could you succeed by these steps?
# zpool create tank
# zfs set sharenfs=on tank
# share
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tank rw ""
The nfs server will be enable automatically while there's any
shareable dataset exist,
(sharenfs or sharesmb = on)
jason wrote:
> -bash-3.2$ zfs
Hi, Christ,
I just verified this issue could simply reproduce in onnv, I've filed
CR #6664649 to trace it.
Thanks for report.
# zpool create -f tank c3t5d0s1 spare c3t5d0s0
# mkfile 100m /var/tmp/file
# zpool add tank sparc /var/tmp/file
# zpool export tank
# format c3t5d0 ( modify c3t5d0s
26 matches
Mail list logo
