Hi All,
We are currently in the process of testing Solaris 10 with ZFS and
Oracle and are running it on a T2000.
When checking performance statistics on the T2000, we notice that only
one thread of the CPU appears to be doing any of the processing.
Leaving all other threads seemingly idle.
A
Hi there,
I think I have managed to confuse myself so i am asking outright hoping for a
straight answer.
First, my situation. I have several disks of varying sizes I would like to run
as redundant storage ina file server at home. Performance is not my number one
priority, largest capacity pos
eFoot is in mouth! My mistake - confused the two tools. That's what I get for
answering off the cuff.
The rest still stands, as confirmed elsewhere.
Craig
In response to Boyd Adamson, who said:
> "Craig Cory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The GUI is an implementation of the webmin tool. You mus
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Dick Davies wrote:
>> On 18/08/07, Matthew Ahrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Blake wrote:
Now I'm curious.
I was recursively removing snapshots that had been generated recursively
with the '-r' option. I'm running snv65 - is this a recent feature?
>>
Dick Davies wrote:
> On 18/08/07, Matthew Ahrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Blake wrote:
>>> Now I'm curious.
>>>
>>> I was recursively removing snapshots that had been generated recursively
>>> with the '-r' option. I'm running snv65 - is this a recent feature?
>> No; it was integrated in snv_
On 18/08/07, Matthew Ahrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blake wrote:
> > Now I'm curious.
> >
> > I was recursively removing snapshots that had been generated recursively
> > with the '-r' option. I'm running snv65 - is this a recent feature?
>
> No; it was integrated in snv_43, and is in s10u3.
Since we're wishing things:
Temporary pool imports, via a flag on zpool.
Pools that are temporarily imported ignore the in-use flag of the pool.
It should not be written either, whether it's set as in use or not. This
would allow accessing the pool manually in a multiboot scenario, where
it belon
> One problem, though. I'll start out with a ZFS pool on 2x200GB disks
> + a 200GB slice/partition on a 250GB disk (with 50GB as system etc);
> that works, right? 400GB of storage and one disk can fail with no
> data loss, I suppose.
Assuming raidz, yes.
> If so: what happens when I in the future
Hey everybody,
I'm thinking of moving my file server (at home) from Linux to
Solaris, mostly due to ZFS and DTrace.
One problem, though. I'll start out with a ZFS pool on 2x200GB disks
+ a 200GB slice/partition on a 250GB disk (with 50GB as system etc);
that works, right? 400GB of storage and
