Anon wrote:
> Have the ICH-8 and ICH-9 been physically tested with Solaris? The page
> for the ACHI driver still only lists through ICH-6 as having support?
> What is the Solaris support for the rest of the ICH-9 chipset such as
> USB, etc.?
I've just been in contact with my colleagues who
develo
Have the ICH-8 and ICH-9 been physically tested with Solaris? The page for the
ACHI driver still only lists through ICH-6 as having support? What is the
Solaris support for the rest of the ICH-9 chipset such as USB, etc.?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hi All,
Sorry to bother you all.
if this is possible, how do I go about it?
I just spent the evening trying to get b68 installed on to a 1GB Sandisk Ultra
III CF using a CF - IDE adapter, the drive gets detected, minimal Solaris
installs OK (I put /swap on another disk), when it is time to reb
Krzys wrote:
> Hello everyone, I am slowly running out of space in my zpool.. so I wanted to
> replace my zpool with a different zpool..
>
> my current zpool is
>> zpool list
> NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
> mypool 278G263G 14.7G
I think he means this:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itsmc.doc_5.3.3/ans595.htm
On 8/13/07, Adrian Pead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > I do not know if ibm has officially said they support ZFS but with the
> > latest client (5.4.
Matt wrote:
> I do not know if ibm has officially said they support ZFS but with the latest
> client (5.4.1.2) my file systems show up as ZFS now and a quick test restore
> seems to restore ZFS ACL's as well now. They also all appear to be included
> as local filesytems so no work arounds are n
Hmmm, do I need to wait for Samba 3.0.26?
http://www.nabble.com/VFS-module-handling-ACL-on-ZFS-t3730348.html#a10614406
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Could anyone give me some possible problems that would have created the
following scenario?
Testing the conversion of a ZFS Pool on a hardware mirror to that same
ZFS Pool using ZFS mirroring, by breaking the mirror, attaching the 2nd
disk to the pool...
bash-3.00# zpool scrub zpool02
bash-3.00#
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 16:42 +0100, Paul Lippai wrote:
> If so, could you point me in the direction of where I can obtain
> details of this new feature from.
proposed specs and architecture review discussion can be found at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2006/525/
("
Hi Paul,
ZFS Boot on Sparc is not available yet.
We are targeting to have it in the onnv gate in a couple of months.
Thanks,
Lin
Paul Lippai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Searching this alias I can find a number of guides and scripts that
> describe the configuration of Solaris to boot from a ZFS rootpool
Hi,
Searching this alias I can find a number of guides and scripts that
describe the configuration of Solaris to boot from a ZFS rootpool.
However, these guides appear to be Solaris 10 x86 specific.
Is the creation of a ZFS boot disk available for Solaris SPARC ?
If so, could you point me in t
What samba are you running? Try (I think) /etc/sfw/bin/smbd -V to test
version. I know there was a bug with ZFS/Samba interaction around v 3.24 -
I believe 3.25a and upward fixed that.
Blake
On 8/13/07, Peter Baumgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got Samba configured in an active dire
I do not know if ibm has officially said they support ZFS but with the latest
client (5.4.1.2) my file systems show up as ZFS now and a quick test restore
seems to restore ZFS ACL's as well now. They also all appear to be included as
local filesytems so no work arounds are needed to back them a
I've got Samba configured in an active directory domain, but I'm having
issues getting acls to work properly. Adding users or groups via a Windows
client results in the error:
'Unable to save permission changes on myshare. Access is denied.'
I'm running snv_68. Does ZFS have Samba compatible acls?
Hello Robert,
now we are using snv60 and snv67 and moving many TB of data every day and no
corruption problem any more.
Unfortunately the following problems force us to stay with UFS for our
production servers:
6417779 ZFS: I/O failure (write on ...)
6322646 ZFS should gracefully handle all dev
15 matches
Mail list logo
