Hi.
My system crashed today. System reboots without a problem and now everything
looks as usual.
By the way I used ztune.sh to tune parameters several days ago so the problem
may be related to that script
Is that a zfs issue or something different?
Thanks,
Roman
---
-bash-3.00# more /var/ad
On 4/14/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I certainly agree. but what I wanted to do is remove those big files
completly from my system, so I would make sure its gone from each snap. I
certainly do understand the design of zfs file system and I was just wondering
if what I wanted is possi
Strange thing, I did try to do zfs send/receive using zfs.
On the from host I did the following:
bash-3.00# zfs send mypool/zones/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh 10.0.2.79 zfs receive
mypool/zones/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password:
^CKilled by signal 2.
1 or 2 minutes later I did break this command and I
On 4/15/07, Chris Gerhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I would really like to see a zpool dump and zpool restore so that I
could throw a whole pool to tape it is not hard to script the recursive zfs
send / zfs receive. I had to when I had to recover my laptop.
http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg/e
While I would really like to see a zpool dump and zpool restore so that I could
throw a whole pool to tape it is not hard to script the recursive zfs send /
zfs receive. I had to when I had to recover my laptop.
http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg/entry/recovering_my_laptop_using_zfs
--chris
This
Yes, I certainly agree. but what I wanted to do is remove those big files
completly from my system, so I would make sure its gone from each snap. I
certainly do understand the design of zfs file system and I was just wondering
if what I wanted is possible... so just on that one file example that
Krzys wrote:
Is there a way to mount file system as read/write and be able to
remove those big files that I dont need there?
My understanding is that shapshots are read/only by design, so I don't
think you are going to be able to remove files from them.
One thing to remember is that if t
Hello folks, I have strange and unusual request...
I have two 300gig drives mirrored:
[11:33:22] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /d/d2 > zpool status
pool: mypool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
mypool ONLINE 0 0 0
[moved from request-sponsor to zfs-discuss]
Start of thread:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/2007-April/001661.html
ARC proposal
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/2007-April/001677.html
On 4/14/07, Jeremy Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attached is m
> I hope this isn't turning into a License flame war.
> But why do Linux
> contributors not deserve the right to retain their
> choice of license
> as equally as Sun, or any other copyright holder,
> does?
>
> The anti-GPL kneejerk just witnessed on this list is
> astonishing. The
> BSD lice
So you're talking about not just reserving something for on-disk compatibility,
but also maybe implementing these for Solaris? Cool. Might be fairly useful
for hardening systems (although as long as someone had raw device access,
or physical access, they could of course still get around it; that
BTW, flash drives have a filesystem too; AFAIK, it's usually pretty much
just FAT32, which is garbage, but widely supported, so that you
can plug them in just about anywhere. In most cases, one can put
some other filesystem on them, but I wouldn't rule out the possibility
that that might not work
You've ruled out most of what there is to talk about on the subject, I think.
If the licenses are incompatible (regardless of which if either is better),
then a Linux distro probably couldn't just include ZFS.
Now maybe (assuming ZFS were ported, which I doubt anybody would bother
with until a rea
13 matches
Mail list logo
