Hi,
soon it'll be time to migrate my patchwork pool onto a real pair of
mirrored (albeit USB-based) external disks.
Today I have about half a dozen filesystems in the old pool plus dozens of
snapshots thanks to Tim Bray's excellent SMF snapshotting service.
What is the most elegant way of migrat
On March 27, 2007 1:43:01 PM +0800 Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As promised. I got my 6140 SATA delivered yesterday and I hooked it
up to a T2000 on S10u3. The T2000 saw the disks straight away and is
"working" for the last 1 hour. I'll be running some benchmarks on it.
I'll probabl
Pity the price of a JBOD is so close to a Controller unit...
On 3/27/07, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/24/07, Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On March 23, 2007 5:38:20 PM +0800 Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I should be able to reply to you next Tuesday -- my
Ayaz Anjum wrote:
Hi !
I have currently an NFS server over ufs above 5 TB with alot of ACL which i was
planning to migrate to zfs. But since backup of zfs with ACL is not possible, i
am very upset for not being able to go ahead with replacing ufs with zfs.
Backing up ZFS ACL:s is supported o
On 3/24/07, Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On March 23, 2007 5:38:20 PM +0800 Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should be able to reply to you next Tuesday -- my 6140 SATA
> expansion tray is due to arrive. Meanwhile, what kind of problem do
> you have with the 3511?
Frank,
A
Hi !
I have currently an NFS server over ufs above 5 TB with alot of ACL which i was
planning to migrate to zfs. But since backup of zfs with ACL is not possible, i
am very upset for not being able to go ahead with replacing ufs with zfs.
Ayaz
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Hello Wade,
Monday, March 26, 2007, 6:04:16 PM, you wrote:
WSfc> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/26/2007 11:00:23 AM:
>> Tomas Ögren wrote:
>> > On 26 March, 2007 - Hans-Juergen Schnitzer sent me these 3,5K bytes:
>> >
>> >> I am sorry, we don't have oracle databases on zfs filesystems
>> >> (
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
I have a nexsan atabeast with 2 raid-controllers each with 21 disks @
400 GB.
Each raid-controller has five raid-5 LUN's and one hotspare. The
solaris is from 2006/11. I have created a single raidz2 tank from the
ten LUN's.
The raid-conroller is connected to a Dell P
- Forwarded by Wade Stuart/FALMSP/USA/NA/FALLON on 03/26/07 11:30 AM
-
Wade Stuart/FALMSP/USA/NA/FALLON wrote on 03/26/2007 11:02:08 AM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/26/2007 10:58:07 AM:
>
> > i have tested links performance. and i have got such results:
> > with hardlinks - no pr
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Viktor Turskyi wrote:
i have tested links performance. and i have got such results:
with hardlinks - no problems, reading of 5 files one million times takes 38
seconds
in case with symlinks is another situation - reading of 5 files(through
symlinks) one million tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/26/2007 11:00:23 AM:
> Tomas Ögren wrote:
> > On 26 March, 2007 - Hans-Juergen Schnitzer sent me these 3,5K bytes:
> >
> >> I am sorry, we don't have oracle databases on zfs filesystems
> >> (colleagues of mine are currently exploring RMAN to backup oracle
> >> d
Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 26 March, 2007 - Hans-Juergen Schnitzer sent me these 3,5K bytes:
I am sorry, we don't have oracle databases on zfs filesystems
(colleagues of mine are currently exploring RMAN to backup oracle
databases, that reside on a ufs filesystem, however).
We are doing backups of
i have tested links performance. and i have got such results:
with hardlinks - no problems, reading of 5 files one million times takes 38
seconds
in case with symlinks is another situation - reading of 5 files(through
symlinks) one million times takes 3,5 minutes.
Is this OK? Is it norma
Hi.
I have a nexsan atabeast with 2 raid-controllers each with 21 disks @ 400 GB.
Each raid-controller has five raid-5 LUN's and one hotspare. The
solaris is from 2006/11. I have created a single raidz2 tank from the
ten LUN's.
The raid-conroller is connected to a Dell PE 2650 with two qlogic 23
>> I am sorry, we don't have oracle databases on zfs filesystems
>> (colleagues of mine are currently exploring RMAN to backup oracle
>> databases, that reside on a ufs filesystem, however).
>>
>> We are doing backups of zfs storage pools with about 2000 filesystems
>> (basically home directories).
On 26 March, 2007 - Hans-Juergen Schnitzer sent me these 3,5K bytes:
> I am sorry, we don't have oracle databases on zfs filesystems
> (colleagues of mine are currently exploring RMAN to backup oracle
> databases, that reside on a ufs filesystem, however).
>
> We are doing backups of zfs storage
I am sorry, we don't have oracle databases on zfs filesystems
(colleagues of mine are currently exploring RMAN to backup oracle
databases, that reside on a ufs filesystem, however).
We are doing backups of zfs storage pools with about 2000 filesystems
(basically home directories). Some of the iss
HI Hans !
what is ur recommendation, for putting oracle database on zfs and backing
up with tsm ? Have u tried any restores ? any issues other than ACL's
thanks
Ayaz
Hans-Juergen Schnitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/26/2007 12:01 PM
To
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
cc
Hi,
we are using TSM to backup zfs.
Currently, zfs is not supported at all and therefore you cannot
backup zfs ACLs with TSM. TSM 5.5, which will probably be available
at the end of the year, will have basic ZFS support (including
backup and restore of ACLs).
Hans Schnitzer
Ayaz Anjum wrote:
>What is slow here is mounting all those FS at boot and
>unmounting at shutdown. The most relevant project here in my
>mind is :
>
> 6478980 zfs should support automount property
>
>which would give ZFS a mount on demand behavior. Fast boot/shutdown
>and fewer mounted FS at any one time.
Richard L. Hamilton writes:
> _FIOSATIME - why doesn't zfs support this (assuming I didn't just miss it)?
> Might be handy for backups.
>
Are these syscall sufficent ?
int utimes(const char *path, const struct timeval times[2]);
int futimesat(int fildes, const char *path, const str
21 matches
Mail list logo
