FYI, Pawel Wojcik has been blogging about the design of
the SATA framework. This may answer some questions which
occasionally pop up on this forum.
http://blogs.sun.com/pawelblog
-- richard
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss ma
[attempt to clean up the text, sorry if I miss something]
James Dickens wrote:
On 1/12/07, Kyle McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick P Korsnick wrote:
i just set up snv_54 on an old p4 celeron system and even tho the
processor is crap, it's got 3 7200RPM HDs: 1 80GB and 2 40GBs. so i'm
On 1/12/07, Kyle McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick P Korsnick wrote:
> hi,
>
> i just set up snv_54 on an old p4 celeron system and even tho the processor
is crap, it's got 3 7200RPM HDs: 1 80GB and 2 40GBs. so i'm wondering if there is
an optimal way to lay out the ZFS pool(s) to ma
Hi Robert,
We've experienced luck with flaky SATA drives in our STK array by
unseating and reseating the drive to cause a reset of the firmware. It
may be a bad drive, or the firmware may just have hit a bug. Hope its
the latter! :-D
I'd be interested why the hot-spare didn't kick in. I thought
ZFSers,
I'm working through my backlog of blogs. I've added some analysis of
space vs U_MTBSI that you might find interesting.
http://blogs.sun.com/relling
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensol
Patrick P Korsnick wrote:
hi,
i just set up snv_54 on an old p4 celeron system and even tho the processor is
crap, it's got 3 7200RPM HDs: 1 80GB and 2 40GBs. so i'm wondering if there is
an optimal way to lay out the ZFS pool(s) to make this old girl as fast as
possible
as it stands no
Chris Smith wrote:
What build/version of Solaris/ZFS are you using?
Solaris 11/06.
What block size are you using for writes in bonnie++?
I
ind performance on streaming writes is better w/
larger writes.
I'm afraid I don't know what block size bonnie++ uses by default - I'm not
specifying
Patrick P Korsnick wrote:
hi,
i just set up snv_54 on an old p4 celeron system and even tho the processor is
crap, it's got 3 7200RPM HDs: 1 80GB and 2 40GBs. so i'm wondering if there is
an optimal way to lay out the ZFS pool(s) to make this old girl as fast as
possible
as it stands no
Oops... my fault... I wasn't introducing enough corruption! My test file was
not at the beginning of the disk! Sorry for the wasted bandwidth...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http:
After watching the flash demo on self-healing I thought I would try the
experiment myself. Instead of a mirror, i created a raidz pool made up of 9
disks. I copied a large file into the pool. Then, like in the demo, I
corrupted one of the disks with a dd command. I did the digest... I did the
Can someone check if the spam filter is working for this list?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lesa Griffith
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:15:34 +0480
Subject: [zfs-discuss] Rebel: 'We aided bin Laden escape'
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
EPRT Has Wild 10 days as Stock climbs.
Sy
Neil Perrin wrote:
We are currently working on separate log devices such as disk and nvram.
This should help with both NFS and DB performance.
It also makes things "interest" from the zfs-crypto view point. It
means that it would allow a configuration where we don't do encryption
on the ZIL
Hello Robert,
Friday, January 12, 2007, 12:42:42 PM, you wrote:
RM> Hello zfs-discuss,
RM> When can we expect it to be available?
Sorry, by mistake I sent ii to wrong list.
--
Best regards,
Robertmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
Hello zfs-discuss,
When can we expect it to be available?
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.
Hello zfs-discuss,
One of our drives in x4500 is failing - it periodically
disconnects/connects. ZFS only reports READ errors and no hot-spare
automatically took in which was expected currently.
So I issued zpool replace with a hot-spare drive.
Now it takes forever and it seems like ZF
hi,
i just set up snv_54 on an old p4 celeron system and even tho the processor is
crap, it's got 3 7200RPM HDs: 1 80GB and 2 40GBs. so i'm wondering if there is
an optimal way to lay out the ZFS pool(s) to make this old girl as fast as
possible
as it stands now i've got the following dri
16 matches
Mail list logo
