Patrick P Korsnick wrote:
hi,

i just set up snv_54 on an old p4 celeron system and even tho the processor is 
crap, it's got 3 7200RPM HDs: 1 80GB and 2 40GBs.  so i'm wondering if there is 
an optimal way to lay out the ZFS pool(s) to make this old girl as fast as 
possible....

as it stands now i've got the following drive layout:

pri master: 80GB (call it drive1)
pri slave: 40GB (drive 2)

sec master:40GB (drv 3)
sec slave: DVD

(all connected with 80 conductor ribbons)

my partitions are:
drive 1: i've got 2 10GB UFS root slices (so i can do live upgrades), and 1GB 
swap slice
i've got one big zpool consisting of a 50GB slice on drive 1 and all of drives 2 
& 3.

If the zpool is a dynamic stripe, then yes, you are in the most performant 
config.

i'm not sure that this is the optimal layout for striping. i don't need mirroring or redundancy-- just speed. i'm thinking maybe i'd be better booting off one of the smaller drives and putting the other two on one controller and putting the zpool on those only. spanning the two IDE controllers with the single zpool seems like it might be a bad idea, but i am just postulating here....

Friends don't let friends use RAID-0 (aka just dynamic striping)

I don't think the IDE controllers will be the bottleneck.  More likely
you will hit limitations on memory with only a 32-bit processor.  Of course,
that all depends on what you are doing, but I wouldn't spend much time trying
to make it be a speed demon, because time is money.
 -- richard
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to