Hi Richard,
Thank you for taking so much time on this! The array is a StorageTek
FLX210 so it is a bit underpowered...best we could afford at the time.
In terms of the load on it we have two servers running Solaris 10.
Each physical server then has two containers, each one has a MySQL
instance
I finally found the answer myself.
By re-reading the doc, I re-discovered the term" resilvering", that I did not
understand properly the first time.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
htt
In the same vein...
I currently have a 400GB disk that is full of data on a linux system.
If I buy 2 more disks and put them into a raid-z'ed zfs under solaris,
is there a generally accepted way to build an degraded array with the
2 disks, copy the data to the new filesystem, and then move the
or
On 30/11/06, Michael Barto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to update some of our Solaris 10 OS systems to the new zfs file
system that supports spares. The Solaris 6/06 version does have zfs but does
not have this feature. What is the best way to upgrade to this functionality?
Hot
I would like to update some of our Solaris 10 OS systems to the new zfs
file system that supports spares. The Solaris 6/06 version does have
zfs but does not have this feature. What is the best way to upgrade to
this functionality? Also we have a 3/05 version of Solaris and the Sun
Express nv_
Ah, did not see your follow up. Thanks.
Chris
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Sorry, Bart, is correct:
If new_device is not specified, it defaults to
old_device. This form of replacement is useful after an
existing disk has failed and
Hold on, so I need to add another drive to the system for the replacemnt? I do
not have any more slots in my system to add another disk to it. :(
Chris
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
One minor comment is to identify the replacement drive, like this:
# zpool replace mypool2 c3t
Great, thank you, it certainly helped, I did not want to loose data on that disk
therefore wanted to be sure than sorry
thanks for help.
Chris
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Bart Smaalders wrote:
Krzys wrote:
my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10 U2
(by the wa
>All with the same problem. I disabled the onboard nvidia nforce 410/430
>raid bios in the bios in all cases. Now whether it actually does not look
>for a signature, I do not know. I'm attempting to make this box into an
>iSCSI target for my ESX environments. I can put W3K and SanMelody on ther
Hi Jason,
It seems to me that there is some detailed information which would
be needed for a full analysis. So, to keep the ball rolling, I'll
respond generally.
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Richard,
Been watching the stats on the array and the cache hits are < 3% on
these volumes. We're ver
Dave
which BIOS manufacturers and revisions? that seems to be more of
the problem
as choices are typically limited across vendors .. and I take it
you're running 6/06 u2
Jonathan
On Nov 30, 2006, at 12:46, David Elefante wrote:
Just as background:
I attempted this process on the follo
Sorry, Bart, is correct:
If new_device is not specified, it defaults to
old_device. This form of replacement is useful after an
existing disk has failed and has been physically
replaced. In this case, the new disk may have the same
One minor comment is to identify the replacement drive, like this:
# zpool replace mypool2 c3t6d0 c3t7d0
Otherwise, zpool will error...
cs
Bart Smaalders wrote:
Krzys wrote:
my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris
10 U2 (by the way, I thought U3 would be out i
Krzys wrote:
my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10
U2 (by the way, I thought U3 would be out in November, will it be out
soon? does anyone know?
[11:35:14] server11: /export/home/me > zpool status -x
pool: mypool2
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devi
Douglas Denny wrote:
In reading the list archives, am I right to conclude that disks larger
than 1 TB need to support EFI? I one of my projects the SAN does not
support EFI labels under Solaris. Does this mean I would have to
create a pool with disks < 1 TB?
Out of curiosity ... what array is
Hi Krzys,
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 12:09 -0500, Krzys wrote:
> my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it?
You should be able to do this using zpool replace. There's output below
from me simulating your situation with file-based pools.
This is documented in Chapters 7 and 10 of the ZFS admin g
my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10 U2 (by
the way, I thought U3 would be out in November, will it be out soon? does anyone
know?
[11:35:14] server11: /export/home/me > zpool status -x
pool: mypool2
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices could not
Platform:
- old dell workstation with an Andataco gigaraid enclosure
plugged into an Adaptec 39160
- Nevada b51
Current zpool config:
- one two-disk mirror with two hot spares
In my ferocious pounding of ZFS I've managed to corrupt my data
pool. This is what I've been doing to test
> In reading the list archives, am I right to conclude that disks larger than
> 1 TB need to support EFI? I one of my projects the SAN does not support EFI
> labels under Solaris. Does this mean I would have to create a pool with
> disks < 1 TB?
I would assume so.
The Solaris VTOC label (likely y
In reading the list archives, am I right to conclude that disks larger than
1 TB need to support EFI? I one of my projects the SAN does not support EFI
labels under Solaris. Does this mean I would have to create a pool with
disks < 1 TB?
TIA.
-Doug
___
Hello,
Sorry if my question is a newbie question, but I am not an administrator
familiar with storage, I am just curious about ZFS. I tried to look for an
answer in the ZFS documentation and the mailing list, but I found nothing
obvious.
Can you tell me what happens when an additional device is
On Nov 29, 2006, at 13:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect a lack of an MBR could cause some BIOS implementations to
barf ..
Why?
Zeroed disks don't have that issue either.
you're right - I was thinking that a lack of an MBR with a GPT could
be causing problems, but actually it loo
When I booted my laptop up this morning it took much longer than normal
and there was a lot of disk activity even after I logged in.
A quick use of dtrace and iostat revealed that all the writes were to
the zpool.
I ran zpool status and found that the pool was resilvering.
Strange thing is t
23 matches
Mail list logo
