[zfs-discuss] Re: raidz2 is alive!

2006-06-25 Thread Nathanael Burton
> Is this a bug? > > >capacity operationsbandwidth > ed avail read write read write > -- - - - - - - > zfs 14.2G 1.35T 0 62 0 5.46M > raidz214.2G 1.35T 0 62 0 5.46M > c0d0-

[zfs-discuss] Re: raidz2 is alive!

2006-06-25 Thread Justin Conover
Is this a bug? capacity operationsbandwidth pool used avail read write read write -- - - - - - - zfs 14.2G 1.35T 0 62 0 5.46M raidz214.2G 1.35T 0 62 0 5.46M c0d0-

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS Wiki?

2006-06-25 Thread Nathanael Burton
> Just some random thoughts on this... > > One of the initial design criteria of ZFS is that > it's simple. If it's > not, that was a bug... > > If we need tutorials to use the zfs commands, has > something missed the > mark? > > If the information that is needed to do the work is > NOT in the m

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Wiki?

2006-06-25 Thread Mike Gerdts
On 6/25/06, Nathan Kroenert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just some random thoughts on this... One of the initial design criteria of ZFS is that it's simple. If it's not, that was a bug... If we need tutorials to use the zfs commands, has something missed the mark? When new ways of doing things

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Wiki?

2006-06-25 Thread Nathan Kroenert
Just some random thoughts on this... One of the initial design criteria of ZFS is that it's simple. If it's not, that was a bug... If we need tutorials to use the zfs commands, has something missed the mark? If the information that is needed to do the work is NOT in the man pages, perhaps we cou

[zfs-discuss] raidz2 is alive!

2006-06-25 Thread Justin Conover
Already making use of it, thank you! http://www.justinconover.com/blog/?p=17 I took 6x250gb disk and tried raidz2/raidz/none # zpool create zfs raidz2 c0d0 c1d0 c2d0 c3d0 c7d0 c8d0 df -h zfs Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on zfs915G49K 915G

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Wiki?

2006-06-25 Thread Nathanael Burton
> Currently the Genunix facility, including the wiki, > is a resource for the > OpenSolaris Community, run by OpenSolaris community > members. Anyone > wishing to contribute OpenSolaris related content is > welcome to make use > of it. > > Down the road, Sun may decide to provide a wiki > facilit

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Wiki?

2006-06-25 Thread Jeff Victor
Another place would be: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS Of course, there are pros and cons to each place, and also pros and cons to one ZFS wiki page vs. two. Nathanael Burton wrote: I was browsing around the OpenSolaris pages and came across the http://www.genunix.org/wiki/";>OpenSolaris wiki

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Wiki?

2006-06-25 Thread Al Hopper
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Nathanael Burton wrote: [ reformatted... ] > I was browsing around the OpenSolaris pages and came across the href="http://www.genunix.org/wiki/";>OpenSolaris wiki at genunix. I > did a quick search for "zfs" on the wiki and it returned no results. > Are there plans for

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Wiki?

2006-06-25 Thread Nathanael Burton
I was browsing around the OpenSolaris pages and came across the http://www.genunix.org/wiki/";>OpenSolaris wiki at genunix. I did a quick search for "zfs" on the wiki and it returned no results. Are there plans for putting content related to ZFS on a wiki? Would the OpenSolaris wiki be the des

[zfs-discuss] Re:

2006-06-25 Thread Nathanael Burton
By the way, with the URL for the ZFS version information in the subject line of the topic, it prevents a user from clicking the thread and reading it. It takes you directly to the URL instead of the thread. The workaround is to click the user name of the person who made the last post, which ta

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on 32bit x86

2006-06-25 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Erik, Friday, June 23, 2006, 2:35:30 AM, you wrote: ET> So, basically, the problem boils down to those with Xeons, a few ET> single-socket P4s, and some of this-year's Pentium Ds. Granted, this ET> makes up most of the x86 server market. So, yes, it _would_ be nice to ET> be able to dump

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Bandwidth disparity between NFS and ZFS

2006-06-25 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Neil, Saturday, June 24, 2006, 3:46:34 PM, you wrote: NP> Chris, NP> The data will be written twice on ZFS using NFS. This is because NFS NP> on closing the file internally uses fsync to cause the writes to be NP> committed. This causes the ZIL to immediately write the data to the intent