On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 19:21 -0800, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
> So how did it go? Were notes taken?
>
Everything went fine and it didn't take that long, unlike some of the
previous meetings. Notes are at the end of:
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Barcelona,_2012
Cheers,
Richard
___
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 14:26 -0600, Chris Conlon wrote:
> On Sep 6, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > This looks like an interesting piece of software and a quick read
> > through your webpages suggests there may be some interesting
> > applications of this wit
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 12:30 +0100, Maxin B. John wrote:
> From: "Maxin B. John"
>
> Latencytop needs superuser privileges. The latencytop plugin in
> eclipse invokes it as 'sudo latencytop'. So, it will be good to
> include sudo as a runtime dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John
> ---
>
Various people at various times have expressed an interest in webhob
which will be a web interface to bitbake's functionality as an evolution
of the capabilities of the current hob UI. There are some people looking
at the design of it and who are actively working on figuring out what it
should look
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 00:37 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-01-28 11:16 AM, Daniel Kenji Morgan wrote:
> > Sorry to bring up an old post, but I haven't managed to find information in
> > the mail archives and bugzilla on how the issue stands as of today.
> >
> > The post I am referring to is
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:01 -0800, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> I'm currently at ELC and am going to be a little slow with email.
> However, tonight I will be building M4 rc1. We are looking pretty
> green and had been hoping to use the last build for rc1, but we want
> to get it a little closer as
The 1.4 release is scheduled for 2013/04/26. We have one milestone
release before then, M5 on 2013/03/17. This is also the feature complete
deadline.
This means if there are features or other changes you want to see in
1.4, they need to be in by the 17th[1]. After the 17th we'll be doing
bugfixing
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > The 1.4 release is scheduled for 2013/04/26. We have one milestone
> > release before then, M5 on 2013/03/17. This is also the feature complete
> > dead
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 14:06 +0100, Maxin B. John wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Perf build fails while trying to build core-image-minimal for qemux86,
> $ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky
> $ cd poky
> $ source oe-init-build-env
> $ bitbake core-image-minimal
Sorry about this, I merged a patch which
We're now in the planning stages for the 1.5 release scheduled for about
6 months time. The process hasn't changed, if there are things you'd
like to see worked on in this timeframe, please ensure there are entries
for them in the bugzilla. Usually these are "enhancement" requests.
https://bugzill
There have been some concerns raised at the TSC recently about how
transparent the Yocto Project development process is and how and where
it connects to OpenEmbedded. When you're dealing with companies and
engineers there does need to be a process with things like schedules and
in the interests of
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 15:48 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> Our first release candidate for dylan has been started. It will be
> available this evening at:
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20130410-1
>
> Repo Branch Hash
> pokydylan a
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 13:40 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 15 April 2013 07:46:42 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > If I want to get an idea of what's going to be in the next release,
> > dylan, which branch do I use: dylan or 1.4_M5?
>
> So, dylan is already quite a few bugfixes ahead of 1.4_M5
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 13:14 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> We're delayed slightly for the 1.4_M6.rc2 build. The build should be
> soonish, once RP gives me the thumbs up. Please adjust your schedules
> accordingly, we're hoping to get this started in a few hours.
We do have a 1.6_M6.rc2 candi
th a somewhat older
> metadata (poky rev 09359e6ec00901abfe49157f1f9730117b4d284b)
> the shell is run using my user id.
>
> With a newer poky rev 90b98764555945a186562ca8d501a9585ce2b23f,
> the shell runs as 'root'.
>
> This change came with this revision:
>
> commit 4dc31a327be1a506e78e1d028db08c
I was having intermittent i2c issues on the device until I applied this kernel
patch
which I found online.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
.../sl030raspberrypii2ckernel.patch| 32
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_3.2.27.bb |1 +
recipes
latest pi kernel is 3.6.
There is nothing special about these headers so lets remove them and use the
standard
system provided recipe, avoding any rebuilds. I tested the various other
recipes in
the layer and there doesn't seem to be any dependency on these headers.
Signed-off-by: Richa
media/build1/poky/meta-intel/meta-fri2/'
and if I try to build MACHINE=fri2, I get strange errors due to the .bb files
not being parsed.
The fix is simply to use +=, just like every other layer.conf file.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
meta-jasperforest/conf/layer.conf |2 +-
1 file
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 06:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-04-23 06:29, Andreas Enbacka wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for info, I will try with that.
> >
> > //Andreas
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
> > Sent: 23. huhtikuuta 201
I've promised to start sending out some kind of status updates. I have a
few things that are worth communicating and we have a kind of fresh
start with 1.5 so here goes. This one turned out lengthier than I'd
like, I'm not planning on writing an essay in future!
I'm also hoping this email will sav
Hi,
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 14:24 -0600, Esteban Rivera wrote:
> I'm trying to generate an image for the FRI2 using the official Intel
> BSP provided in the Yocto Project website, in this image I want to
> include at least one package manager.
>
> I'm Using poky 8.0 with Hob GUI, from the recipes li
In summary its been a fairly quiet week, there are number of different
holidays in different geos.
Pending Patches
===
There has been a steady stream of 1.5 patches starting to appear. With
Saul's help these have been tested on the autobuilder and then many have
been merged into maste
I've just found out that there is currently a proposal in the Gnome
project to change the way they write and run tests. I know Colin posted
it a few weeks ago but somehow I missed the mail and I suspect others
did too:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests
When you read through this, y
Its been a few weeks since I sent one of these out, mainly as I've not
had much to report.
Pending Patches
===
Patches have been steadily getting reviewed and merged. Some things took
a little longer than is ideal due to travel on Saul and my part. I know
Saul is still travelling.
Au
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 06:48 +, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
> Except x86/x86-64 hosts, can Yocto support to run on hosts with other
> CPU arch, e.g. ARM, Powerpc, etc?
You mean as the system to run the builds on? In theory that would be
possible although most people tend to use x86 and the other
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 20:54 +0530, Rohit2 Jindal wrote:
> Please help me out I am stuck in some issue, actually I want my recipe to do
> compilation everytime on every run of
>
> Bitbake linux-yocto
>
> ie can I remove stamping or sstate-cache that it allows me to run compilation
> everytime on
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 09:49 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-06-20 04:40 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently, Paul, Ross, Richard and I had a video conference meeting where we
> > had some initial discussion on how to satisfy YOCTO #2808
> > (https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.o
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 14:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have put together eglibc recipes for upcoming 2.18 release and pushed to a
> contrib tree here
>
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/eglibc-2.18
>
> They built angstrom/systemd-images fine and boot
Hi Bruce/Darren,
My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has come to
remove it. There are basically two chunks of code in there.
The meta-linaro pieces in there haven't been touched in two years and
are there
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 08:52 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-06-28 04:51 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Hi Bruce/Darren,
> >
> > My attention was drawn to the existence of poky-extras. This was really
> > a short term gap filling repository and I think the time has c
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-06-28 09:22 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> > All I need is the name to make some initial changes.
>
> Personally, I'm fine with 'meta-yocto-kernel'. Naming things is
> never easy, so I won't agonize over whether or not an "extras"
>
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 23:18 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> On 06/30/2013 10:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:33 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> > > I can change the name shortly. Is there any reason to keep a read-only
> > > copy available at the current location temporaril
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 10:20 -0700, Elizabeth Flanagan wrote:
> A few notes, since I talked with Darren about this earlier.
>
> As one of the people in charge of maintaining the git repo, I would like to
> avoid having, as Darren suggested, a whole
> bunch of -contrib repos. However, maybe I'm mi
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 20:59 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 11-04-27 6:47 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > I don't understand wanting to keep multiple distinct source trees in a
> > single
> > git repositorie. If you have two different layers in there, each in its own
> > branch, then you can only wor
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 22:05 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2011/5/3 Philip Balister
>
> [...]
>
> People ask me why they should join the eV. Besides being a
> good way to show your support for the OpenEmbedded project,
> the Technical Steering Committee is ele
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 23:15 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2011/5/3 Richard Purdie
> This was discussed at the last TSC meeting and we reviewed the
> TSC
> meeting minutes where it was recorded that:
>
> """
>
Hi Scott,
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 14:59 -0700, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> One thing that happens when you keep all figures in a folder that is
> hierarchically level with 'documentation' is that the figures become
> separated from the 'documentation' leg so to speak. It use to be that
> good file
Hi Liping,
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 09:50 +0800, Liping Ke wrote:
> From: Liping Ke
>
> Below four patches are for putting extra requested fields inito different
> cache files instead of using only on bb_cache.dat. Now image creator need
> extra three fields. And in the future, there might be more
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:40 +0800, Ke, Liping wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed design guide. I will sync up with Jessica and redo
> the patch.
>
> And thanks for advice of the namedtuple usage. During the implementation,
> we did tried several ways of inheritance refactory, but all failed with
>
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:39 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Using machine override has one small benefit
>
> when I have meta-nokia layer which has only recipes with
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "nokia900" and I'm building different machine (like
> om-gta02) I get this warning:
> WARNING: No bb files match
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 10:47 -0700, Daryl Spitzer wrote:
> I followed the "Building an Image" instructions in the Yocto Project
> Quick Start (on a newly configured machine running Ubuntu 11.04 (64
> bit), and got an error. The contents of the failure logfile is:
>
> NOTE: fetch
> http://anonym..
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 15:09 -0700, Stewart, David C wrote:
> I think it's reasonable as a M* milestone
Agreed. The whole point of the milestones is to check for regressions
introduced by major changes like the toolchain upgrade. We now know what
the regressions are and can work to address them. Th
Hi,
I've talked to variois people about adding things to the unscheduled
feature list. This was buried at the bottom of the current schedule but
it now has its own page:
https://wiki.pokylinux.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_Unscheduled_Feature_List
I'd really like to get the stuff on there cleaned up. I
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 11:32 -0700, Daryl Spitzer wrote:
> I'm continuing to try to successfully build an image for the first
> time, following the instructions in the Yocto Project Quick Start
> (http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.1/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html).
>
> As suggested in
> ht
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 15:17 -0700, Daryl Spitzer wrote:
> How do I find out where DL_DIR is pointing?
>
> I found this line, commented out in conf/local.conf:
>
> #DL_DIR ?= "${TOPDIR}/downloads"
>
> It's not listed after I run `bitbake -k poky-image-sato`:
>
> OE Build Configuration:
> BB_VERS
We've merged a number of things which should have helped performance
recently. Changes in my test included:
* Splitting out the locale generation [not merged yet]
* Not building tar-replacement-native when we don't need it
* Cleaned up dependencies for native/nativesdk
* Cleaned up dependencies fo
Hi Dongxiao,
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 08:57 +0800, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
> Recently I was doing the "configure optimization" feature and
> collecting data for it.
>
> The main logic of this feature is straight forward:
>
> 1. Use the diff file as autoreconf cache. (I use command: "diff -ruN
> SOURCE-
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 00:19 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Refresh the meta-yocto components of the beagleboard BSP in support of the
> recently sent linux-yocto updates for the kernel. The audio mixer patch is a
> stop-gap that should be eventually replaced with a more generic
> implementation,
> su
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 00:41 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Richard/Saul,
>
> Updating the SRCREVs to take into acccount the utrace update from
> Tom. With this, the stage is set for systemtap support.
>
> The following changes since commit 2163461ec94528ecf046a04edc5db3d2dd3a6b8b:
> Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:37 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> This is the merge request for Darren's update beagleboard
> support (and update to the other BSPs that picked up
> the common USB patch).
>
> This is based on the meta updates that went out to the oe-core
> list in a separate pull request
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 18:29 +0100, O'donoghue, Bryan wrote:
> ASSUME_PROVIDED += "m4-native tcl-native gettext-native libtool-native
> quilt-native autoconf-native automake-native perl-native
> sqlite3-native tar-replacement-native pseudo-native"
I don't know about the pseudo issue, the system rea
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 08:17 +0100, O'donoghue, Bryan wrote:
> Saul, Richard.
>
> Thanks for the suggestions re: building the whole thing from scratch.
>
> In a previous life using openembedded our solutions for slow builds
> were an array of ASSUME_PROVIDEDs. I'll try the build the world
> approa
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 16:44 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
> NiQingliang wrote:
> > I have changed that code section, and solved my problem, but I don't
> > know if it is the right way.
> >
> > if isinstance(event, bb.event.CacheLoadCompleted):
> > pbar.hide()
> >
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> I wanted to ping the list on this bug as I've drilled down into it and
> I see what's going on. These are the steps to reproduce it and I have
> some questions at the end
>
> The issue: The autobuilder has been serving up bad kern
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 15:31 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't this always be the state of DL_DIR i.e. any change made to the
> > contents of SRC_URI be exactly r
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:57 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 02:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> > diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py
> > index f3bc793..7954f66 100
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:00 -0700, Turner Randy wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Is there a interactive menu-based configuration for yocto/poky builds
> similar to that provided in Buildroot? Or is someone working on this?
At present there is not any interactive menu based configuration but
there is work
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 07:17 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> poking around my git clone and i notice a few references to what
> *seems* to be the older script for init'ing the build environment in
> the documentation directory:
>
> $ grep -rw poky-init-build-env *
> adt-manual/adt-prepare.xml:
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 12:01 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2011 11:51 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> > In our technical team call today we spent some time discussing how to
> > support distribution releases that are due to happen around the time of
> > Yocto 1.1.
> >
> > Yocto 1.1 is scheduled
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 20:28 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> On 07/13/2011 03:48 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and
> >> a couple questions about style. first, is the proper s
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and
> a couple questions about style. first, is the proper spelling
> "Bitbake" or "BitBake" since the doc source seems to bounce back and
> forth and it really should be c
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 05:46 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> > On 07/13/2011 03:48 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >> just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and
> > >>
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 08:06 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:00 -0700, Turner Randy wrote:
> >> Hello list,
> >>
> >> Is there a interactive menu-based configuration for yocto/poky
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 07:43 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
>
> ---
>
> i'm hoping the following is correct -- it's just user help output so
> it's not fatal but it should still be correct.
>
> diff --git a/scripts/oe-setup-builddir b/scripts/oe-setup-builddir
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 16:56 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 07/14/11 12:34, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/14/11 12:21, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Op 14 jul 2011, om 18:20 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
> >>>
>
>
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 19:10 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Joshua Lock wrote:
>
> > As I understand it documentation repository updates are reflected on
> > the website so the docs tend to reflect the released version.
> >
> > It would be nice to be able to provide developme
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 19:55 -0500, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> The meta-intel BSPs currently have a number of machine settings common
> to all - factor these out into a couple common include files.
For reference common include files are usually placed in
conf/ma
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 08:33 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > Where is the best place to ask questions and try and get support for adding
> > some toolchain variations in?
> >
> > I'm wanting to add support in for a few different flavors of PPC that
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 10:15 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> (look on the bright side -- eventually, after many, many patches, i
> will have nothing left to whine about.)
:)
> from quick start manual, i notice that all toolchain tarballs have
> "sdk" in the filename, whereas the actual download
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 09:54 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Kumar Gala
> > wrote:
> >> I've been working on trying to get an e500v2 (linux-gnuspe) compiler
> >> working and seem to have build a native toolchain. How
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 01:26 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Fixes bug [YOCTO #1161]
> Fixes bug [YOCTO #773]
>
> This streamlines the routerstation pro configuration to remove options
> that are either unecessary or that are causing bugs.
>
> Also added to all branches is:
>
> commit ffd73d6b2a
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:32 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Scott Garman
> wrote:
> > bitbake world should build all of the available packages that aren't
> > explicitly excluded due to machine incompatibilities. It doesn't generate a
> > final image tho
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 10:37 +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Building python for poky bernard fails for me with the following error:
>
> ...
> ...
> Looking in tk80 for
> ['/home/ahaupt/yocto-git/build/tmp/sysroots/atom-pc/usr/lib']
> Looking in tcl80 for
> ['/home/ahaupt/yocto-git/build
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 11:37 +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> thanks for your answer. See below ...
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:59:51AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 10:37 +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 00:21 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Who is the best person to ask about adding new BSPs into yocto. What
> I mean by this is having a meta layer hosted on git.yoctoproject.org
> like meta-intel and the mechanics associated with this (getting new
> repo on git server, autobuilder
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:30 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> As you know, I've been working on several kernel efforts
> around the FSL parts as well (in particular the ones that
> have enough pieces upstream to work out of the box). I
> definitely don't want to overlap in a way that doesn't
> create
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 08:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Hi Kumar,
> >
> > As you know, I've been working on several kernel efforts
> > around the FSL parts as well (in particular the ones that
> > have enough pieces upstream to work out of the box). I
> > definitely don't want to overlap in a wa
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:23 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I was wondering what distinction qualified for a BSP existing in a
> meta layer vs in poky directly.
>
> For FSL PPC we currently have MPC8315-RDB in poky. Ideally we'd have
> one BSP for each major flavor [ associated with a unique compiler
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 17:18 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 July 2011 17:09:09 Saul Wold wrote:
> > Matthew,
> >
> > Paul Eggelton recently made a similar change so I am going to drop this
> > one.
>
> Hmm, actually I missed the default to xterm change and thus did not alter
> that
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Bug submitted:
>
> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323
>
> My question still stands even w/o it being in formal docs.
FWIW, POKYMODE was replaced by TCMODE as part of the OE-Core changes.
I'd be interested to know where we've
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> Bug submitted:
> >>
> >> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323
> >
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 17:07 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Richard requested a summary of the current issues shown up on the
> autobuilder,
> here it is:
>
> 1. sstate not getting cleared (autobuilder script fix needed - maybe just
> delete the whole sstate-cache dir?)
> http://autobuilder.yocto
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 14:03 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Require the tune file for x86_64, then TARGET_ARCH is set via the tune
> file and TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH is set automatically in bitbake.conf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
> ---
> meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf |5 +++--
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 14:03 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Require the tune file for x86_64, then TARGET_ARCH is set via the tune
> file and TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH is set automatically in bitbake.conf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
> ---
> meta-jasperforest/conf/machine/jasperforest.conf |
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 23:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:50 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at
[Cross posted but please reply on the Yocto list]
We're starting to think about the development focus for post Yocto 1.1
and are collecting ideas on the unscheduled feature list on the wiki:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_Unscheduled_Feature_List
This is an opportunity for peop
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 07:42 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Is there any way to make Yocto try to get prebuilt packages from known
> repositories rather than trying to rebuild the world?
The system supports a cache of prebuilt objects in the form of the
sstate data to accelerate build times if nothing
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 12:45 -0700, Joshua Lock wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:54 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > [Cross posted but please reply on the Yocto list]
> >
> > We're starting to think about the development focus for post Yocto 1.1
> > and are col
ages and wouldn't translate to any
other package feed.
Cheers,
Richard
>
>
> ______
> From: Richard Purdie
> To: Todd Cooper
> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:37 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Can I suggest that Yocto put it on the futures list, but with a lower
> priority?
You can add it to the list on the wiki.
Which known set of prebuilt packages are you thinking we should be able
to build against?
Cheers,
Richard
___
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 19:05 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323
> >>
> >> My question still stands even w/o it being in formal docs.
> >
> > FWIW, POKYMODE was replaced by TCMODE as part of the OE-Core changes.
> > I'd be intere
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to be
> built?
bitbake -g will dump out a task-depends.dot file which shows which tasks
will run and the task interdependencies...
Cheers,
Richard
__
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 09:27 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> I have been surprised over the last few days at the number of packages
> being built for the core-image-rt target, which for reference is as follows:
>
> #
> # Copyright (C) 2010 Intel Corporation.
> #
>
> DESCRIPTION = "Real-Time Linux Imag
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 11:47 +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:45:22AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:32:17AM +, jani.uusi-rant...@nokia.com wrote:
> > > I had the same issue on 64-bit fedora R15. This patch fixed it for me:
> > >
> > > http://patc
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 16:37 +0200, Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to include the link to the patch:
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=a6c48298b17e6a5844b3638b422fe226e3b67b89
>
> 2011/8/15 Samuel Stirtzel :
> > Hi, after Richard Purdie dropped the
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 08:29 +0100, Chris Tapp wrote:
> I've got a configuration that builds ok under 4.0.1, but when I build
> under 5.0.1 I get the following right at the end:
>
> Installing task-poky-boot (1.0-r7) to root...
> Downloading file:/home/chris/yocto/ebox3300-build/tmp/deploy/ipk/
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 18:06 +0800, Liming Wang wrote:
> Because qemuppc has no graphic emulation, remove console=tty0
> and make it run into 3 run level. This can reduce boot time
> for qemuppc booting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liming Wang
> ---
> scripts/runqemu-internal |4 ++--
> 1 files change
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 20:43 +0100, Chris Tapp wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2011, at 17:16, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 08:29 +0100, Chris Tapp wrote:
> >> I've got a configuration that builds ok under 4.0.1, but when I build
> >> under 5.0.1 I
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 21:58 +0100, Chris Tapp wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2011, at 21:49, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 20:43 +0100, Chris Tapp wrote:
> >> On 19 Aug 2011, at 17:16, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 08:29
1 - 100 of 582 matches
Mail list logo
