On 12/5/12 6:38 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello,
nobody here who could help out?
In message <20121203124234.6327b200...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
according to the documentation [1] the right way to debug applications
on the target is to load the target library information in GDB using
My apologies for the late response. See below, I'll follow up on your second
email as well...
On 11/20/12 9:09 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi wrote:
Poky allows to build custom Linux for you, but we have cases where the post
build customization is required, like user-addition, network configurat
On 11/29/12 5:09 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi wrote:
Added few more thoughts
Looking for possible options to implement Offline Configuration Tool
requirement. please check and comment on it.
Configuration flow:
a) Task do_createconfig will generate data to configure. This serves as input
for
On 12/6/12 4:00 AM, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote:
Can anybody shed some light, please?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
-Original Message-
From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:53 AM
To: openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org; 'yocto@yoctoproject.org'
Subject: Difference o
YP documentation be unnecessary or helpful?
I think it would. The set of compiler/toolchain elements we have is definitely
confusing to someone new.
--Mark
Scott
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hatle
Sent
On 12/12/12 5:43 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 12 December 2012 11:31, Tim Coote wrote:
Am I right in thinking that yum isn't in the standard recipes?
Yum, no. Zypper is in oe-core and is used when you construct a RPM-based image.
(note that Zypper is being replaced by Smart in oe-core master)
On 12/12/12 6:07 AM, Tim Coote wrote:
ok. Thanks.
just spotted the split between rpm / rpm5 and yum. I suppose that the knock on
is managing multiple repos for different update managers.
don't suppose you know if there are material differences from a
packaging/dependency point of view between
On 12/14/12 1:46 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 14 December 2012 19:43, Tim Bird wrote:
"If you need GMAE, you should use the bitbake meta-toolchain-gmae command. The
resulting installation script when run will support such development. However, if
you are not concerned with GMAE, you
can generat
On 12/14/12 4:12 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
On 12/14/2012 12:45 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 12/14/12 1:46 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 14 December 2012 19:43, Tim Bird wrote:
"If you need GMAE, you should use the bitbake meta-toolchain-gmae command. The
resulting installation script when run
On 12/14/12 3:57 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
Actually I talked with Richard regarding retiring the toolchain targets
(meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-gmae) as Mark mentioned that now we can build a
toolchain matching the >image. Also,
On 12/16/12 4:57 PM, Sean Liming wrote:
My 2c (USD) is for clarity on ADT vs. SDK vs. Toolchain.
The biggest clarify problem I've seen is the terms being intermingled. There
are clear definitions for each.
Toolchain, the compiler and related tools that enable compiling software for a
give
On 12/24/12 6:06 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
at the moment, the only mention of that task is in the reference
manual. does it deserve additional coverage, perhaps in the ADT
manual? just asking.
I would recommend any place that mentioned "meta-toolchain" or variants as a way
to generate
On 1/3/13 1:52 AM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
[PATCH] fix build with automake-1.13.
Long obsolete AM_CONFIG_HEADER is completely removed from automake-1.13,
which errors out upon seeing it.
configure.in -> configure.ac rename is not strictly necessary yet,
use of deprecated name still gives only war
On 1/3/13 10:00 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 1/3/13 1:52 AM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
[PATCH] fix build with automake-1.13.
Long obsolete AM_CONFIG_HEADER is completely removed from automake-1.13,
which errors out upon seeing it.
configure.in -> configure.ac rename is not strictly necessary yet,
On 1/3/13 5:43 PM, Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote:
Hi,
As my day job mostly involves configuring servers using puppet configuration
management system, I had been thinking of what sort of tool would be best to use
on an embedded devices where on some occasions one would want to update a couple
of config
On 1/4/13 2:56 PM, Alex J Lennon wrote:
Can anybody advise on whether bitbake currently supports offloading of
build tasks onto multiple systems? Perhaps cloud based?
I see Chris Larson has already answer the main question here.. but I've got some
additional insight I can add.
I'm thinking
to the build of an -sdk image".
But if we look at this email from Mark Hatle:
http://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg10636.html
I get the impression that Mark is saying: "now that '-c populate_sdk'
is available, there no longer is any need for separate -sdk image
On 3/26/13 1:12 AM, Sipke Vriend wrote:
Hi all,
With help from Khem's email we have been able to perform 'some' sanity
checking against the microblaze architecture.
The TUNECONFLICTS assist us in ensuring conflicting features are flagged during
the bitbake sanity check, however because Microbla
On 3/26/13 7:53 AM, Jerrod Peach wrote:
As part of my company's firmware builds, we have to build some code that only a
handful of developers are allowed to view. We call this restricted source code.
Getting our official "system" builds to build this code isn't a problem. What
is a problem is
On 3/26/13 9:25 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Tuesday 26 March 2013 14:37:36 Vanveerdeghem, Simon wrote:
We are using Yocto with a couple of users, to prevent that our build
server has duplicates of downloads, we share the DL_DIR.
But we have problems with permissions. When a user run
On 4/25/13 10:36 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
Hi there,
I have a couple of questions regarding the compliance program. If
there is a better place for asking such questions, please let me know.
I have studied the Yocto compliance documentation, [1] on the website,
and I have the following questio
You can use the license manifest to give you this information. See:
build/tmp/deploy/licenses/--/...
There is a license.manifest and package.manifest. The license.manifest includes
package version.
--Mark
On 4/25/13 9:10 AM, Jon Szymaniak wrote:
Hi all,
I generally like to keep a little
On 5/1/13 6:02 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 13-05-01 12:12 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Apr 30, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote:
The flag: -Wno-unused-but-set-variable isn't supported on older
versions of gcc such as gcc-4.1.2 which is the native compiler for
RHEL-5.9. Drop this warning flag
On 5/7/13 1:28 PM, Post, Travis wrote:
Is it possible to create source RPMs from Yocto? If so, is there any
documentation or guidance on how to do this? I’ve found a bug that was closed
mentioning:
INHERIT += "archive-patched-source"
SOURCE_ARCHIVE_PACKAGE_TYPE = "SRPM"
However, this results i
Recently on the eglibc mailing list there has been a discussion about removing
the option groups. See: http://www.eglibc.org/archives/patches/msg01268.html
For folks who don't know what option-groups are, it's a patch that went into
eglibc a number of years ago that allows you to disable vario
On 6/28/13 5:53 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 28 June 2013 11:16, Paul Barker wrote:
Just chiming in to say that sounds excellent. Will this contain a
known-working make as well for those with a broken make 3.82?
What systems have a broken 3.82? I'm aware that Debian Experimental
has it, but st
Speaking as a member of the TSC, our understanding is an election would be
called for the first position at the beginning of May. (More or less this
week.)
The TSC members up for election was decided by the TSC to be in the order of the
original board announcement, with the final two members goi
Yes. It seems like some mailers lost the dial-in info.
Toll-Free 1-877-561-6828 (US)
Toll 1-972-995-
Participant Code 49611427
--Mark
On 6/28/11 10:08 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:16:47PM +, Liu, Song wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> In order to make the meeting more
On 6/28/11 5:50 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 18:29 +0100, O'donoghue, Bryan wrote:
>> ASSUME_PROVIDED += "m4-native tcl-native gettext-native libtool-native
>> quilt-native autoconf-native automake-native perl-native
>> sqlite3-native tar-replacement-native pseudo-native"
>
>
On 6/29/11 2:17 AM, O'donoghue, Bryan wrote:
> Saul, Richard.
>
> Thanks for the suggestions re: building the whole thing from scratch.
>
> In a previous life using openembedded our solutions for slow builds were an
> array of ASSUME_PROVIDEDs. I'll try the build the world approach instead !
>
On 9/2/11 2:33 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
> Hi Mark and Richard,
>
> I am trying to setup a RPM multilib system that, it is a qemux86-64 base
> image with MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL = "lib32-connman-gnome". With several
> fixes, the build can pass.
>
> However in run time testing I met a problem that, f
On 9/2/11 10:40 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> However in run time testing I met a problem that, for those libraries whose
>>> base/multilib versions packages will be both built out (like libgtk, it has
>
On 9/2/11 11:24 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> The normal OE approach is to resolve all items by run-time dependencies.
>> That
>> is why a lot more is built then installed.
>>
>> So if you want a sy
On 9/2/11 1:36 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> For everything I see, that should work.
>>
>> In classes/image.bbclass, RDEPENDS is augmented by the contents of
>> IMAGE_INSTALL, LINGUAS_INSTALL,
On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:45 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom
On 9/15/11 8:43 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
> Can you please try to remove “image-prelink" from conf/local.conf’s
> USER_CLASSES
> and re-build an image to see if that would make a difference?
>
>
>
> Recently looks prelinking was broken and this causes segfaults in some
> packages.
>
I believe
On 10/13/11 4:37 AM, Ni Qingliang wrote:
> hello all.
>
> I have added 2 packages, one is lib, and the other is bin.
>
> the lib will generate 2 files:
> libx.so.1.0.1
> libx.so -> libx.so.1.0.1
> the latter linked to the other one.
>
> the bin package will link to the libx.so.
>
>
On 10/25/11 11:08 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Yu, Ke wrote:
>>> Seems like with the build packages and build image steps separated you could
>>> skip the build step completly for most packages if we ship or host
>>> pre-built build
>>> packages
>>>
>>>
(I'm going to try to send out these quick blurbs as prelink-cross is synced to
the upstream. Upstream changes are fairly infrequent, so this will be a low
volume set of emails. Most emails in the future will be shorted then this one.)
prelink-cross has been synced up to the latest upstream preli
What machine are you using (amount of ram, disk space, and cpu cores)?
What configuration did you set for parallel builds?
I can build 1.1 on an 8 core i7 system w/ 8 GB of ram, set with parallel
settings of 8 thread and 8 parallel make jobs, in about 100 minutes (or less).
--Mark
On 10/28/11 9
gt; On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> What machine are you using (amount of ram, disk space, and cpu cores)?
>>
>> What configuration did you set for parallel builds?
>>
>> I can build 1.1 on an 8 core i7 system w/ 8 GB of ram, set with parallel
&
On 10/31/11 5:57 AM, Mike Tsukerman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've build rpm packages and met some interesting things.
> In the rpm all scripts and files include root paths from machine that i've
> build on.
> how can i change that?
Examples of the problem are definitely needed. There are some cases
On 10/30/11 11:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
>
>> On 30/10/11 15:32, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>
>>>all the docs recommend twice the number of cores (AFAICT), yet the
>>> template local.conf file suggests that, for a quad core, the value of
>>
Making a release announcement on behalf of the pseudo maintainer...
pseudo 1.2 is now released. It can be pulled from:
Via git:
git://github.com/wrpseudo/pseudo.git
git://git.yoctoproject.org/pseudo.git
branch PSEUDO_1_2
or the tarball from
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/pseudo/p
yocto-requ...@yoctoproject.org
> <mailto:yocto-requ...@yoctoproject.org>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>yocto-ow...@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto-ow...@yoctoproject.org>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so
On 11/7/11 10:01 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> current poky ref manual seems pretty adamant about need for
> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM:
>
> "Note that this variable is mandatory for all recipes, unless the
> LICENSE variable is set to "CLOSED".
>
> but there's at least one counter-example,
> meta-dem
On 11/7/11 10:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Mark Hatle wrote:
>
>> On 11/7/11 10:01 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>
>>> current poky ref manual seems pretty adamant about need for
>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM:
>>>
>>> &quo
I was wondering if this or any other Yocto controlled mailing list allows job
postings?
I don't see anything forbidding it at this point -- but I'm not sure I want to
start a trend unless there is some consensus.
--Mark
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoct
On 11/14/11 10:16 PM, Michael E Brown wrote:
> I've now run across this same error in two different contexts, and am
> having difficulty trying to figure out what is going on
>
> First, while building meta-toolchain-sdk, I ran into
> http://pastebin.com/BT02UYk1
> ... cut ...
> Processing task-co
On 11/15/11 9:06 PM, Michael E Brown wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 22:16 -0600, Michael E Brown wrote:
I've now run across this same error in two different contexts, and am
having difficulty trying to figure out what is going on
First, while building meta-toolchain-sdk, I ran into
http://pastebi
On 11/15/11 10:19 PM, Mike Tsukerman wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to build my own image for my own machine configuration ( based on
beagleboard )
and get some errors. Please tell me what package is missing?
error: Failed dependencies:
| /usr/bin/env is needed by automake-1.11.1-r4.armv7ahf
| /usr/b
On 11/14/11 3:49 PM, Erway, Tracey M wrote:
Folks,
I’m presenting a Yocto Project session at the upcoming Linux Foundation
Automotive Summit in Yokohama, Japan at the end of November.
I thought that folks on this list might have suggestions for pertinent subject
matter that I should include in
On 11/16/11 4:07 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
Mark Hatle said:
Yocto is a cross-compiled build environment. This is a departure to a lot of
the Moblin/MeeGo work that has occurred in the past. The advantages are you
can use any commodity PC to target any (supported) architecture
On 11/21/11 10:17 AM, Marc Ferland wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Khem Raj mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Marc Ferland mailto:marc.ferl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the proper way to add a line to the ld.so.conf file for
On 12/2/11 10:08 AM, Michael E Brown wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 09:35 -0600, Marc Ferland wrote:
Hi,
What's the proper way to add a line to the ld.so.conf file for a new
library I am adding?
Does yocto support /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ (like every other distro out there
from the past 7 years or so
A new version of the prelink-cross has been pushed to the repository.
There are no upstream changes to the main prelink component, all changes are
specific to the cross functionality. Below is the Changelog:
2011-12-08 Mark Hatle
* rtld/rtld.c: Fix an issue where missing objects
On 12/20/11 2:33 AM, Navani Kamal Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
We are facing the problem when we are compiling poky-bernard5.0 –( bitbake –v –b
poky-image-eb.bb )
Log data follows:
|
/home/prashanth/yocto/poky-bernard-5.0/build/tmp/work/mx35pdk-poky-linux-gnueabi/poky-image-eb-1.0-r0/temp/run.do_r
On 1/5/12 9:59 AM, Jim Abernathy wrote:
I'm finding differences between the number of task for building
meta-cedartrail on ubuntu 11.10 vs. doing the same thing on Fedora 14
and wondered if this is a problem.
On a clean build of core-image-sato, the first section has 63 tasks on
Ubuntu 11.10, bu
I'm getting the same error. There is a workaround:
Add the following to your local.conf
WARN_QA = "ldflags useless-rpaths rpaths"
A new QA check went in, and it appears to be missing part of the merge.
(WARN_QA is normally defined as:
WARN_QA ?= "ldflags useless-rpaths rpaths unsafe-reference
On 1/5/12 3:52 PM, autif khan wrote:
I bitbaked core-image-sato-sdk, copied it to the target disk and tried
to build mono natively on the target machine and I got the following
error:
libtool: link: cannot find the library `=/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.la' or
unhandled argument `=/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.l
On 1/11/12 11:21 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
What is the purpose of building the provided images with time limited kernel?
Can I assume that a standard build of the unchanged meta-cedartrail BSP will use
the non-tlk kernel?
Simple reason, the creator of the BSP wants you to configure and build y
On 1/20/12 8:07 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote:
Hi,
In oe-classic there used to be a machine configuration for an i486sx
based machine called vortex86sx. In the past I was successful in
building a running image for such a target. Since I'd like to make a
new system based on vortex, my goal is to lev
On 2/1/12 10:47 PM, Ni Qingliang wrote:
Hi, ALL:
I'm trying to create a custom image, which is compatible with LSB-core/C
++. The core-image-lsb seems like contain the GUI related packages.
The question is: Do we have core-image-lsb-core or core-image-lsb-c++?
The C++ library should be specif
On 2/2/12 10:08 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 02/01/2012 10:59 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
Am I the only one seeing this dead link? I'm building from master and
can't get to this link that draws the error:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libva/snapshot/libva-1.0.12.tar.bz2
I'm building crownbay bsp with c
s for contributing the ARM TLS fix.
There were no upstream changes to the main prelink component, all changes are
specific to the cross functionality. Below is the Changelog, since the last
update:
2011-12-21 Mark Hatle
* src/arch-x86_64.c: Add support for x32 ABI
2012-02-02 Mark
On 2/3/12 1:01 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi Mark
Good work. Could you also forward this to oe-core ml ?
After I've vetted everything with the integration into oe-core, I will send this
out as part of the review request.
--Mark
Thx
-K
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
We're looking into this issue. You should never get the "pseudo: You must set
the PSEUDO_PREFIX environment variable to run pseudo." message. This means
something appears to have avoided the wrappers.
I'll let you know once we figure out something.
--Mark
On 2/17/12 9:35 AM, Paul Eggleton w
On 3/13/12 1:54 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Liu, Song wrote:
* Opens - 10 min
- Mark: Reusing sstate cache, missing a testcase: found a bug in 1.1, found a
new bug in 1.2, try to use the st cache, the compiler will try to use compiler
from previous
On 3/29/12 4:47 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
somewhere, i'm assuming there's a decent explanation of the
different bitbake assignment variations (=, ?=, ??=), but i don't
immediately see it, and i think it's pretty important that that's
explained properly. pointer?
rday
The bitbake manual
On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is:
The Angstrom core team would like to move angstrom under the yocto banner so
we can formally claim to be 'yocto'.
For it to be on the yocto project web site, it just need to have the layers
On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is:
The Angstrom core team would like to move angstrom under the yocto banner so
we
On 4/9/12 5:36 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
Hi ,
Poky and meta-intel for 1.2_M2 build is failing for syslinux_4.03 recipe.
Did anyone saw this for other BSPs?
ERROR: Function 'do_compile' failed (see
/home/tmelab/yocto/poky/poky-1.2_M2.final/build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/syslinux-native-4.03-r3/t
On 4/10/12 4:18 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 18:08:58 Liu, Song wrote:
Can someone help answer the following question? This happens during Boon
Pin's beta testing using the build at:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/snapshot/poky-8e9f6fc77ac476
3f4ed1f6e7b720
://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org) if you are not able to do so, let me know
and I will file it.
--Mark
Thanks
Boon pin
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hatle [mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:22 AM
To: Paul Eggleton
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Liu, Song; Khor, Boon Pin
Subject
On 7/27/13 10:44 AM, Pier Luigi Fiorini wrote:
Fix the following error:
Variable ALLOW_EMPTY is set as not being package specific, please fix this.
I thought this had already been done. I'll be going over the meta-selinux
sometime this week and will verify all of the bad ALLOW_EMPTY entrie
On 7/31/13 10:05 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 7/27/13 10:44 AM, Pier Luigi Fiorini wrote:
Fix the following error:
Variable ALLOW_EMPTY is set as not being package specific, please fix this.
I thought this had already been done. I'll be going over the meta-selinux
sometime this week and
On 6/19/13 8:53 AM, Philip Tricca wrote:
Ping. Any interest in taking this (and the other patch I sent) into
meta-selinux?
My apologies, I thought this had been integrated already. A similar patch has
been pushed to the repository for the 'master' branch. I have not yet validated
the dylan
On 8/1/13 12:25 PM, Joe Slater wrote:
CQID: 418197
Reference /usr/sbin instead of the directory into which
the script is installed on the host.
This patch and the related audit patch have been applied to both master and
dylan branches. Thanks!
--Mark
Signed-off-by: Joe Slater
---
.../
On 8/6/13 4:07 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Francesco,
On Tuesday 06 August 2013 09:55:06 Francesco Del Degan wrote:
Playing with RDEPENDS variable i'm facing the needs to
specify a dependency based on specific version of a package
(greather than, in my specific case).
The underlying package ma
On 8/6/13 9:41 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 06/08/13 15:31, Gary Thomas wrote:
My embedded device needs to send out email.
I've looked around a bit and I don't see any recipes for a
mail sender, e.g. sendmail or postfix, for Yocto (OE-core).
Have I missed something? Does anyone have any sugges
On 8/6/13 10:00 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 06/08/13 15:50, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 8/6/13 9:41 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 06/08/13 15:31, Gary Thomas wrote:
My embedded device needs to send out email.
I've looked around a bit and I don't see any recipes for a
mail sender, e.g. s
On 8/15/13 2:30 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
From: Saul Wold
On 08/15/2013 11:37 AM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
I've done exactly this in a different Yocto-based project,
and it worked.
Now I'm trying to do the same thing in a Gumstix build, and it's not
working. I have a dumb little recipe that mere
On 8/15/13 7:20 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
From: Mark Hatle
A simple way to diagnose if your package is even in the
install list is to do
bitbake -e , then scan the output for
"PACKAGE_INSTALL". If your package
is not listed there, then something has either cleared your
configurat
I have updated meta-selinux, and placed the update into the 'master-next'
branch.
This was locally tested with Poky as of commit
853bc53cd58a621918f0e5ce662dba263d1befb4.
Note, when building the core-image-selinux, the internal refpolicies cause a lot
of failures. I'm not an expert on how t
On 11/15/13, 1:54 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 11/14/13, 9:58 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
Hm, a day that will live in infamy indeed
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 11/14/2013 08:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
Happy
On 11/14/13, 9:58 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
Hm, a day that will live in infamy indeed
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 11/14/2013 08:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
Happy birthday, Yocto Project!
what's a birthday
On 1/9/14, 5:26 PM, fl...@twobit.us wrote:
From: Philip Tricca
Setting DESTDIR in the policycoreutils do_install creates a bad
symlink for load_policy. This patch fixes up the Makefile to
create the symlink relative to DESTDIR.
Merged to 'master-next'. Note, I updated the patch to include a
On 1/8/14, 7:38 PM, wenzong@windriver.com wrote:
merged to master-next
From: Wenzong Fan
Changes:
1) Uprev selinux packages to release 20131030;
2) Fix build dependency to libsemanage;
3) Fix QA issues to policycoreutils;
4) Update LIC_FILES_CHKSUM for selinux packagegroups.
Some Tests:
merged to master-next
On 1/8/14, 8:54 PM, wenzong@windriver.com wrote:
From: Wenzong Fan
In Yocto the real path for udevd is /lib/udev/udevd, this patch fixes
the init issues like:
udevd[87]: setfilecon /dev/vcsa2 failed: Operation not permitted
udevd[89]: setfilecon /dev/fb0 fa
master and dora branches have been updated.
If anyone finds any issues, please let Pascal and I know.
Thanks!
--Mark
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On 1/24/14, 4:26 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 24 January 2014 10:21, wrote:
Do I have to define a new BSP?
Did anyone have a similar problem and could give me some advice?
IIRC, genericx86 targets Atom and higher (the README lists the target
hardware) so it's quite possible that the compiler
that the version in the rules.d should be copied into
/etc/audit.
Do this and correct the systemd services file to use the same file.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle
---
recipes-security/audit/audit/auditd.service | 2 +-
recipes-security/audit/audit_2.3.2.bb | 5 +
2 files changed, 6 inser
On 4/20/14, 7:15 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to put in place a development workflow using the PR server,
RPM package feeds and smart update/install on a target.
I see that when I modify and rebuild my recipe, foo, the PR server
increments its count within the RPM filename, but the R
On 4/22/14, 1:50 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote:
On 22/04/2014 02:36, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/20/14, 7:15 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to put in place a development workflow using the PR server,
RPM package feeds and smart update/install on a target.
I see that when I modify and re
On 4/11/12 10:14 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
Hi Mark,
I met a strange issue while using RPM to generate the rootfs.
In the installation list, if we have 2 RPM packages, say A.rpm and
B.rpm. package A RDEPENDS on package B. While installing the two
packages? Does RPM ensures to install B first and t
On 4/11/12 10:37 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:25 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/11/12 10:14 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
Hi Mark,
I met a strange issue while using RPM to generate the rootfs.
In the installation list, if we have 2 RPM packages, say A.rpm and
B.rpm. package A
On 4/11/12 10:51 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:45 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/11/12 10:37 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:25 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/11/12 10:14 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
Hi Mark,
I met a strange issue while using RPM to generate the
On 4/16/12 5:14 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble
eglibc needs libc-posix-regexp-glibc& libc-libm-big enabled in it's
configuration to avoid following eglibc build issue.
...
| In file included from xregex.c:634:0:
| xregex.c: In function 'byte_regex_compile':
| xregex.c
On 4/16/12 8:01 PM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
Hi,
I am testing beagleboard with RPM, and there is a question I am confused
with that PACKAGE_ARCH is renamed for certain packages. For example the
"acl" package, whose expected PACKAGE_ARCH is "armv7a-vfp-neon", however
in RPM file, the arch is renamed t
On 4/17/12 1:43 AM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
2012/4/17 Xu, Dongxiao:
Hi,
I am testing beagleboard with RPM, and there is a question I am confused
with that PACKAGE_ARCH is renamed for certain packages. For example the
"acl" package, whose expected PACKAGE_ARCH is "armv7a-vfp-neon", however
in RPM
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
