I updated a note that points the reader to the maintainers list. The
note in the master branch pointed the reader to a nonexistent (old) file.
Signed-off-by: Robert Cochran
---
documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-newbie.xml |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --
Hello,
As reported in Information Week (link below), Intel announced a new Atom
S1200 family for micro servers. I believe Yocto has applications for
this family of processors. Assuming this is true, when do we see a
Yocto BSP for this family?
I don't actually expect that there are plans al
Hi,
I'm glad to hear that the bitbake manual is getting an update, and I'm
sure you guys know a lot of debugging tricks that I don't know.
Can you please include a section on debugging bitbake build errors
(beyond logs, -D, and -v)? In other words, what's the best way to
instrument or hack
After gunzipping the archives, the text files don't seem to be text:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Hello,
We're going to bring an Atom based netbook in house for some additional
yocto testing. I would greatly appreciate any recommendations for ones
that behave well with the yocto project & are solid in general. Also,
letting me know about any netbooks to avoid would also be appreciated.
P1010 is a single core processor, don't use SMP for defconfig
Should we get a meta-fsl-ppc mail list going?
Signed-off-by: Robert Cochran
---
conf/machine/p1010rdb.conf |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/conf/machine/p1010rdb.conf b/conf/machine/p1010rdb.c
On 11/23/2011 02:51 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
We also have things working on the Toshiba NB305. The atom-pc machine
FWIW I have asus eepc here and it works great with yocto/oe-core/meta-intel
___
yocto
On 02/09/2012 06:21 PM, Cherry, John wrote:
Hello Yocto developers,
Mentor Embedded (part of Mentor Graphics) recently announced the
availability of its new Embedded Linux Kit. This download is absolutely
free and available to anyone that would like to tinker with a prebuilt,
Check it out at
Hello All,
I see that a meta-oracle-java layer showed up recently in the yocto
repositories. That's great.
Was there an announcement about this new layer sent on a mailing list or
posted in a blog? I had thought I was on all the yocto-related mail
lists (https://lists.yoctoproject.org/), b
On 02/20/2012 01:24 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 02/20/2012 06:03 AM, Joshua Immanuel wrote:
I ended up writing new
recipes for packages which does not exist in yocto. I think it will be
useful for others. So, how do I contribute these new recipes?
Hi Joshua,
I'd put your layer up on a g
On 02/22/2012 08:57 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 14 feb. 2012, om 15:52 heeft Bob Cochran het volgende geschreven:
Hello All,
I see that a meta-oracle-java layer showed up recently in the yocto
repositories. That's great.
Was there an announcement about this new layer sent on a mailing li
I have noticed in the nightly buildbot failure reports for ppc & mips
that the build names are switched (e.g., nightly-mips triggers the
nightly-ppc build and vice versa).
The name and builderNames appear to be switched in yoctoABConfig.py, and
I think this patch will correct this one.
Sign
Robert has done a great job pointing out issues and problems with the
documentation. Shouldn't the issues that are clearly breaks (like a
broken link) be entered into bugzilla?
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Documentation
On 03/07/2012 11:10 AM, Rifenbar
On 03/09/2012 08:43 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-03-09 07:20 AM, David Nyström wrote:
Hi All,
Whats yoctos take on LTSI ?
http://git.linuxfoundation.org/?p=ltsi-kernel.git;a=summary
http://lwn.net/Articles/484337/
I've noticed that LTT-ng and other kernel patches are independently
ported a
On 03/29/2012 11:04 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
Should we review the required packages details for the other distros to make
sure they are up to date?
It might be worthwhile to also point out that additional packages are
required to build the documentation. It might be "nice" to document t
On 03/30/2012 01:20 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
There are a few outstanding items for 1.2 as part of M4 .. one of
them is squashing the remaining configuration values that are
causing warnings.
I'm also seeing some kernel config errors for the MPC8315 while beta
testing. Should I ignore or purs
I set MACHINE_ESSENTIAL_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS += "bogus" in my local.conf.
This var is used in core-image-minimal; it's assigned to
RRECOMMENDS_task-core-boot inside task-core-boot.bb.
Per the yocto glossary: "... the image will build if a file in this list
is not found. "
But it doesn't build:
Q: Which architecture did you choose to build?
A: Very basic tests with default qemux86 and more extensive tests with
mpc8315e-rdb (I have that piece of hardware)
Q: How easily were you able to build an image and boot an image?
A: Qemu was very easy & nice. For mpc8315, I created a u-boot im
On 04/10/2012 04:40 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
I think this is a summary of the steps needed to reconfigure the kernel,based
on the instructions in the 6.0.1 dev manual:
1) bitbake linux-yocto -c clean
2) bitbake linux-yocto -c menuconfig
3) bitbake linux-yocto -c compile -f
4) bitbake linux-yocto
Hi Zhenhua,
Can we get an update on Layerscape? It's been about 6 months since the
Yocto layers organization for Layerscape was last talked about on this
board.
When will we first see an instance of the stage 2 organization (e.g.,
meta-fsl-layerscape) in the yocto project source repos
(htt
Hello,
Can someone please share with me the forecast (or any info) on whether
the Yocto Project Kernel methodology will be picked up by additional non
Intel cores / companies in 2014 or beyond?
I was just reviewing the available branches in linux-yocto-dev and
linux-yocto-3.10, and I see tha
On 11/22/2013 05:43 AM, Zhenhua Luo wrote:
Hi all,
Currently concurrent SDKs are on-going(e.g. SDK 1.5, T1040/T2080, LS1, etc),
the same Yocto branch is used for multiple releases, there is conflict of Yocto
recipes for different SDKs.
To resolve above issue, following branch mechanism will b
On 12/23/2013 09:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
I can add a few thoughts.
We obviously have the reference BSPs to represent the major architectures, and
on the linux-yocto mailing list, we've been looking at BSPs from LSI as well as
some other pending boards (I'm waiting on them to be submitted, s
On 04/11/2012 04:42 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
Is there a page somewhere that gives a rough idea of how quickly a full build
runs on various systems?
I need a faster build platform, but want to get a reasonable price /
performance balance ;-)
I'm looking at something like an i7-2700K but am not ye
On 04/11/2012 08:30 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
SSDs are one way to
go, but we've been known to chew through them and they aren't priced as
consumables.
Hi Darren,
Could you please elaborate on "been known to chew through them"?
Are you running into an upper limit on write / erase cycles? Are you
A reference to meta/recipes-sato/tasks/task-poky.bb is made as a good
example of a task; however, this file / recipe doesn't exist. I
replaced it with meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-boot.bb, which I
think is a both useful and basic example to consider.
Signed-off-by: Robert Cochran
---
.
Hello,
Is it still the case that all Atom solutions have built in video
support? So, if I wanted to use Atom for a headless solution, I would
have idle video hardware.
If this isn't the case, can you please point me to the best Atom
solution to run a headless (yocto) Linux embedded system?
On 05/27/2012 07:41 AM, Kövesdi György wrote:
Hi,
I have a Beagleboard-C4, and have successfully built some default images.
I started to collect receipes for my own build, following their dependencies.
At a point, i got the following error message:
ERROR: Failure expanding variable FILESPATH,
Hello,
I can find a meta-fsl-ppc tree at http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/
and also one at http://git.yoctoproject.org/.
The former was last updated 12 days ago and the latter was last updated
5 weeks ago.
Which repo am I supposed to use going forward? Please explain how these
two tr
On 07/31/2012 01:27 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Is serial console login prompt broken on yocto for targets other than
Intel? Does it work on ARM or PowerPC at the moment, with the latest
yocto updates as of today?
Hi Elvis,
For my Freescale QorIQ e500v2 target, the use of getty inside init /
init
On 08/08/2012 03:05 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
These seem like quite different issues, code generation vs. some
inittab foo... are you seeing this issues with upstream? I've recently
gotten some inittab cleanups into oe-core for master / denzil / my own
edison branch + meta-fsl-ppc...
Hello,
Does this enhancement only address using the same kernel git branch with
different .configs to build multiple kernels?
I want to create a single build directory that generates one rootfs but
has multiple kernels from different git branches and with different
patch sets applied.
The
Hi,
While building a python 2.7 C extension module on the target (e.g.,
python setup.py build) I found that I needed to modify
/usr/lib64/python2.7/_sysconfigdata.py to successfully build the module.
I modified both CC and LDSHARE. For both, I removed
--sysroot=/build/yocto//tmp/sysroots/'.
On 06/01/2015 10:47 PM, Bob Cochran wrote:
Hi,
While building a python 2.7 C extension module on the target (e.g.,
python setup.py build) I found that I needed to modify
/usr/lib64/python2.7/_sysconfigdata.py to successfully build the module.
I modified both CC and LDSHARE. For both, I
Hi,
Looking through the OpenOCD mail lists, I see that a lot of people get
some basic access with various ARM-based SoCs but seem to have various
problems with multi-core or stability / reset issues.
I would greatly appreciate finding out about excellent results with
OpenOCD and any particul
On 09/15/2015 12:38 PM, Romain Perier wrote:
Hi all,
I disagree,
Unfortunately some embedded devices in the industry are not like most
of the tablets and smartphones in the market (no quad or octo cores
with few GB of ram... and few GB of flash...) ;) .For example,
these days, at work, we're
On 09/15/2015 02:22 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On 09/15/15 13:01, Bob Cochran wrote:
On 09/15/2015 12:38 PM, Romain Perier wrote:
Hi all,
I disagree,
Unfortunately some embedded devices in the industry are not like most
of the tablets and smartphones in the market (no quad or octo cores
with
On 11/10/2015 07:06 PM, Randy Witt wrote:
Hi Michael,
See my replies below.
On 11/10/2015 02:27 PM, Michael Habibi wrote:
This is fundamentally why I have been looking into Yocto/BB/OE as a
potential replacement distribution. However, I have a couple questions
stemming from my research. We
On 06/10/2014 07:25 AM, Christian Ege wrote:
Am 10.06.2014 12:38 schrieb "Paul Barker" mailto:p...@paulbarker.me.uk>>:
>
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:52:50PM -0700, Marlon Smith wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm developing a product that will run on a custom i.MX6 board and I'm
> > tryin
On 07/14/2014 04:00 PM, Adam Hughes wrote:
Hi there,
I'm sorry this is a very dull question, and I feel I should be able to find the
information elsewhere, but my google-fu has failed. Please tell me if there is
a better place to ask.
At https://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads it seems that t
As most of you know, the mpc8315e-rdb is the powerpc reference platform
in meta-yocto-bsp. This is old technology and not a good representative
of QorIQ.
I suggest something from the P or T family be used. The P1010RDB is
probably a good choice, but others may prefer an SMP machine.
I'm wi
On 08/14/2014 10:05 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Bob Cochran wrote:
As most of you know, the mpc8315e-rdb is the powerpc reference platform in
meta-yocto-bsp. This is old technology and not a good representative of
QorIQ.
We've been working with FSL to f
On 08/14/2014 10:41 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Bob Cochran wrote:
On 08/14/2014 10:05 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Bob Cochran wrote:
As most of you know, the mpc8315e-rdb is the powerpc reference platform in
meta-yocto-bsp. This is old
Hello,
I'm thinking about chasing down some of the warnings I see when I make
the docs (pdf) in yocto-docs.
However, it's not clear to me whether the warnings I get are to be
expected or can be configured out.
I don't see that the auto builder is used to build the docs. Therefore,
can some
for trying to suppress them or eliminate them. For the time being
though, they would be low on my priority.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cochran
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 12:24 PM
To:
On 09/11/2014 07:41 PM, Nemicolopterus Crypticus wrote:
I'm trying to set up the development environment following these instructions:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.6/adt-manual/adt-manual.html#adt-prepare
I'm currently trying to use a toolchain from within the Build directory, so I'm
fol
On 09/12/2014 12:57 PM, Nemicolopterus Crypticus wrote:
>Just double checking that you are specifying the "toolchain root
location" as your top level build directory (the one above
/conf/local.conf - the directory where you run bitbake).
Yes that occurred to me too, since the phrasing is a bit
On 09/25/2014 10:11 PM, Albert K wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the information. I removed the previously cloned
directory and re-clone it with the following command and now it works.
sudo git clone -b daisy git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded
FYI - you could have done a
$ git branch -r
Won't Toaster give you the insight you seek?
I still need to ramp up on mastering it, but I was hoping it would help
with this sort of thing.
On 11/01/2014 08:08 AM, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote:
I am using Poky daisy / Yocto 1.6.1
Occasionally, when building a custom image or SDK after c
Hi,
I just noticed that newbb.vim in bitbake/contrib is notably different
from the skeleton recipe proposed in the latest Dev Manual.
I'll submit a patch if someone can give me some guidance on what should
be in newbb.vim (or maybe it's the manual that needs to be patched).
Bob
From yocto
On 11/09/2014 08:15 PM, Nick D'Ademo wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply Nick.
Host system is Ubuntu 14.04. ncurses is already installed:
sudo apt-get install libncurses5-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
libncurses5-dev is already the ne
-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cochran
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 1:14 PM
To: Yocto discussion list
Subject: [yocto] newbb.vim vs skeleton recipe in yocto-docs dev manual
Hi,
I just noticed that newbb.vim in bitbake/contrib is notably different fro
m] = \"\"'
+put =''
+put ='S = \"${WORKDIR}/${PN}-${PV}\"'
+put =''
+put ='#inherit '
+
+
" Go to the first place to edit
0
-/^DESCRIPTION =/
+/^SUMMARY =/
exec "normal 2f\""
if
On 11/24/2014 03:22 PM, Stevens, Nick wrote:
I think I've encountered a bug with how multiple bbappend files are processed
when one of the bbappends contains a filename wildcard, but I want to make sure
there's not something I'm missing before filing a bug report.
I have a BSP layer and a cust
On 11/25/2014 06:12 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Bob / Nick,
On Monday 24 November 2014 16:25:58 Bob Cochran wrote:
On 11/24/2014 03:22 PM, Stevens, Nick wrote:
I think I've encountered a bug with how multiple bbappend files are
processed when one of the bbappends contains a filename wil
Hi,
In poky master, FILESOVERRIDES is constructed as follows:
"${TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH}:${MACHINEOVERRIDES}:${DISTROOVERRIDES}"
For my current build, I get:
FILESOVERRIDES="powerpc:custom-machine:e500v2:qoriq-ppc:poky"
FILESPATH is built by calling base_set_filespath(), which is in
utils.bb
On 12/01/2014 11:56 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 01:00 -0500, Bob Cochran wrote:
In poky master, FILESOVERRIDES is constructed as follows:
"${TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH}:${MACHINEOVERRIDES}:${DISTROOVERRIDES}"
For my current build, I get:
FILESOVERRIDES="
Hi,
I'm working with the latest poky master branch (as of this morning:
876370419a), and I can't force a recompile of the kernel:
$ bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f
fails with
| make[2]: *** [prepare3] Error 1
I have seen this with both linux-qoriq and my own derived linux-yocto
recipe
On 01/10/2015 02:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bob Cochran wrote:
Hi,
I'm working with the latest poky master branch (as of this morning:
876370419a), and I can't force a recompile of the kernel:
$ bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f
fails with
On 01/10/2015 02:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bob Cochran wrote:
Hi,
I'm working with the latest poky master branch (as of this morning:
876370419a), and I can't force a recompile of the kernel:
$ bitbake virtual/kernel -c compile -f
fails with
On 08/01/2014 04:09 AM, Georgescu, Alexandru C wrote:
Hi Robert,
The upgrade to Luna is expected to happen during the 1.7 timeframe as
shown here: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6251.
After the upgrade will happen, it will merge into our QA flow to make sure
that the core func
On 01/30/2015 06:20 AM, amruuta ghatge wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to perform LTP testing for POWER ppce500v2.
I used the following rfs and kernel image for testing the LTP test
prefix [cross build for ppce500ve using ppce500v2 custom toolchain] in
QEMU system mode.
http://downloads.yoctoprojec
On 01/05/2015 06:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
On 28/12/2014 00:18, "William Mills" wrote:
On 12/27/2014 10:40 AM, Mills, William wrote:
OK, you are not going to believe me but I swear this really happened ...
We do believe you :)
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6935
Hello All,
Can anyone recommend a ~$50 dev board that runs Yocto and has a single
Gigabit Ethernet port?
The boards we are aware of either have 100Mbit Ethernet, don't meet the
price target, or has a Gigabit Ethernet port that has reduced
capabilities via firmware (Ethernet driver isn't open
com/wiki/index.php/NanoPi_NEO4)
Now, regarding the H2, H3 and H5 I do also support RT kernels for the
4.14 and the 4.19.
So these are your options:
- 4.14.78 SMP
- 4.19.21 SMP
- 4.14.78 PREEMPT-RT
- 4.19.15 PREEMPT-RT
I do updates from time to time on the layer, but not that often.
Hope that helps
Hi,
I'm doing some work with MIPI cameras, and I need a development board
with stable Yocto and MIPI CSI-2 support. At this point, I'm thinking
i.MX, but I'm open to any suggestion.
I'm not sure what type of access I'll have to the D-PHY data streams.
Do they always terminate into a GPU?
On 6/20/19 11:24 PM, Bob Cochran wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some work with MIPI cameras, and I need a development board
with stable Yocto and MIPI CSI-2 support. At this point, I'm
thinking i.MX, but I'm open to any suggestion.
It looks like we're going to purchase an NXP M
67 matches
Mail list logo
