Re: [yocto] Yocto Poky 2.4.1 - Remove python3 from build

2018-10-17 Thread Marwen BRIKCHA
Yes. I've seen compilation log and it does do_install in final image. It's installed in /usr/lib64/python3.5 on RootFS. Le mer. 17 oct. 2018, à 00 h 48, Burton, Ross a écrit : > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 14:06, Marwen BRIKCHA > wrote: > > > > because, when i run : > > : > > $> bitbake -v opencv >

Re: [yocto] Sumo distro problem with dhcp packet?

2018-10-17 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
Hello Kosta and others, I am a bit behind on a schedule on this one. Albeit I followed the advise, This does work for compiling and adding all these packages to the ROOTFS. I see that after I added all them, I see the initramfs.tar.xz expanded in ...poky/build/tmp/deploy/image/beagleboneblack/ dir

Re: [yocto] Sumo distro problem with dhcp packet?

2018-10-17 Thread Kosta Zertsekel
I suggest trying other reference image. For example, core-image-minimal. If it does not help, then core-image-full-cmdline. Let's get the working reference first with one of these images. --- Kosta Z. From: Zoran Stojsavljevic Sent: Wednesday, 17 October 2018

Re: [yocto] Yocto Poky 2.4.1 - Remove python3 from build

2018-10-17 Thread Burton, Ross
Easiest way to determine what is pulling it in is to try removing the package on the target using the package manager. That will tell you what dependencies are keeping it in. Ross On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 08:32, Marwen BRIKCHA wrote: > > Yes. I've seen compilation log and it does do_install in fin

Re: [yocto] Yocto Poky 2.4.1 - Remove python3 from build

2018-10-17 Thread Burton, Ross
Alternatively if you're using RPMs, you can set PACKAGE_EXCLUDE = "python3-core": Error: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides python3-core needed by dnf-2.7.5-r0.corei7_64 Problem 2: conflicting requests - nothing provides python3-core needed by rpm-1:4.14.2-r0.corei7_64 In th

[yocto] Bitbake Build Configurations

2018-10-17 Thread Dhanush K.S
Hi Yocto, I have my bitbake environment set up on the host system CentOS 7 and building images for the target ARM cortex A8 with the following BUILD CONFIGURATION, Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.37.0" BUILD_SYS= "x86_64-linux" NATIVELSBSTRING = "universal-4.8" TAR

Re: [yocto] Add python2 as native package in openembedded sdk

2018-10-17 Thread Burton, Ross
Please remember to CC the list. On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 14:18, Alberto Eusebi wrote: > On Monday 15 October 2018, alle 17:57, Burton, Ross wrote: > > Add nativesdk-python-core and nativesdk-python-modules to > > TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK (using _append). > > But the resulting script don't work, it only

[yocto] meta-oracle-java still maintained?

2018-10-17 Thread Joshua Watt
I was wondering if meta-oracle-java is still maintained? It looks like there haven't been any release branches created since pyro. We are looking at using it to provide virtual/java-native for some build host tools we have that were written in Java, but I want to make sure that it isn't going to d

Re: [yocto] meta-oracle-java still maintained?

2018-10-17 Thread Mark Hatle
On 10/17/18 9:33 AM, Joshua Watt wrote: > I was wondering if meta-oracle-java is still maintained? It looks like > there haven't been any release branches created since pyro. > > We are looking at using it to provide virtual/java-native for some > build host tools we have that were written in Java

Re: [yocto] meta-oracle-java still maintained?

2018-10-17 Thread akuster
On 10/17/18 8:55 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 10/17/18 9:33 AM, Joshua Watt wrote: >> I was wondering if meta-oracle-java is still maintained? It looks like >> there haven't been any release branches created since pyro. >> >> We are looking at using it to provide virtual/java-native for some >> bui

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] tpm2 packagegroup: fix filenames

2018-10-17 Thread Armin Kuster
tpm2.0-tss package names changed, update accordingly Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-tpm/recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-security-tpm2.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-security-tpm2.bb b/meta-t

Re: [yocto] Bitbake Build Configurations

2018-10-17 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:12 AM, Dhanush K.S wrote: > Hi Yocto, > > I have my bitbake environment set up on the host system CentOS 7 and > building images for the target ARM cortex A8 with the following BUILD > CONFIGURATION, > > Build Configuration: > BB_VERSION = "1.37.0" > BUILD_SYS

[yocto] [selinux] sumo compilation

2018-10-17 Thread Sinan Kaya
Hi, We realized today that SELinux does not compile on sumo branch. Is it possible for someone to branch the last working version to a sumo branch? http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-selinux/refs/ NOTE: Running task 352 of 2707 (virtual:native:/sources/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/e

Re: [yocto] [selinux] sumo compilation

2018-10-17 Thread sscott
It was broken in rocko too. I added this to local.conf to workaround the problem: PREFERRED_VERSION_refpolicy-standard = "2.20170204" -steve Sinan Kaya wrote: > Hi, > > We realized today that SELinux does not compile on sumo branch. > > Is it possible for someone to branch the last w

Re: [yocto] [selinux] sumo compilation

2018-10-17 Thread Stefano Cappa
Exactly the same issue since September. Here is my discussion https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-September/042711.html. With that trick did you find a solution also on sumo? Il gio 18 ott 2018, 01:42 ha scritto: > > It was broken in rocko too. I added this to local.conf to wor