[yocto] Use 3G modem on Intel Galileo Gen 2

Hello, I'm working on a project and I use Intel Galileo Gen 2 with Yocto Project Linux. I use LAN to connect to Internet but I would want to connect to Internet with 3G USB modem. I tried using Sakis3g to connect my 3G USB modem with my Intel Galileo and use Internet through it. But I couldn't in

Re: [yocto] Use 3G modem on Intel Galileo Gen 2

Hi Ivan, I've had success connecting my machine to internet with a 3G dongle with connman and ofono recipes. Ofono doesn't recognizes every dongle out of the box. I tried the ones I had and only managed to connect to internet with a "hso" dongle (that would be the name of the driver I think). If y

[yocto] [meta-qt5][meta-raspberrypi]: Qt5 with EGL support for the Raspberry through linux-oe-g++

Hi, I still can't figure out the patch to apply in meta-qt5 to get EGL support with the Raspberry. The test to check EGL does not pass and fails with the following command: arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-g++ -march=armv7-a -marm -mthumb-interwork -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=neon-vfpv4 -mtune=cortex-a7

[yocto] Enable WL1835 cape with beaglebone & yocto latest release jethro

Hello Everybody, Can anyone help me to enable support for *WL1835 *Cape (TI module) with *Beaglebone black *using *yocto project* latest release *Jethro*. How can be this module added in final image core image sato or core image minimal. Thanks -- _

Re: [yocto] RPM bogus signature

On 4/18/16 6:54 AM, Dmytro Milinevskyy wrote: > Hi, > > I've found the culprit. > RPM5 does package auto-signing. Itself it's not a big deal but the problem is > that it also considers that package is valid if the pubkey is present in the > RPM > header. > This is an extremely severe security is

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] bugzilla.yoctoproject.org policy for bugs against multiple releases

On 19 April 2016 at 03:17, Christopher Larson wrote: > There may be something better out there, and if we can find it, great, but > I think separate issues is better than not addressing the issue at all, but > only if the tooling is good enough to help reduce overhead on the part of > the devs de

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] bugzilla.yoctoproject.org policy for bugs against multiple releases

See how gcc project manages it. May be that is sufficient for us too On Apr 19, 2016 9:41 AM, "Burton, Ross" wrote: > > On 19 April 2016 at 03:17, Christopher Larson wrote: > >> There may be something better out there, and if we can find it, great, >> but I think separate issues is better than n

Re: [yocto] module do_configure depends on kernel .config and headers

On 2016-04-18 6:16 AM, Vajzovic, Tom wrote: Hi Bruce, From: Bruce Ashfield Sent: 15 April 2016 18:15 On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Vajzovic, Tom wrote: I am using a meta layer provided by a SOM manufacturer. They have a recipe which sets: What branch are you using ? Fido. inherit mo

[yocto] gobject introspection release notes

Hello, here is the information about gobject introspection that should be placed to the release notes of the upcoming yocto release. 1. Introduction This Yocto release adds support for generating and packaging GObject introspection data. GObject introspection data is a description of the API pr

[yocto] [Fwd: gobject introspection release notes]

Hello, here is the information about gobject introspection that should be placed to the release notes of the upcoming yocto release. 1. Introduction This Yocto release adds support for generating and packaging GObject introspection data. GObject introspection data is a description of the API pro

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][meta-selinux] refpolicy-minimum: port changes for prepare_policy_store

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:34 AM, wenzong fan wrote: > On 04/18/2016 05:02 AM, Philip Tricca wrote: >> >> Hello Wenzong, >> >> On 04/08/2016 01:19 AM, wenzong@windriver.com wrote: >>> >>> From: Wenzong Fan >>> >>> Apply the changes to refpolicy-minimum_2.20151208.bb: >>> >>>commit bfaf2781

Re: [yocto] gobject introspection release notes

thanks for the write up. - armin On 04/19/2016 11:39 AM, alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com wrote: > Hello, > > here is the information about gobject introspection that should be placed > to the release notes of the upcoming yocto release. > > 1. Introduction > > This Yocto release adds support

Re: [yocto] gobject introspection release notes

Hi Alex, On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:39:04 alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com wrote: > here is the information about gobject introspection that should be placed > to the release notes of the upcoming yocto release. > > 1. Introduction > > This Yocto release adds support for generating and packaging GO

Re: [yocto] [meta-qt5][meta-raspberrypi]: Qt5 with EGL support for the Raspberry through linux-oe-g++

Hi again guys, after more investigations: I found out that the default value -lEGL comes from ./mkspecs/common/linux.conf which is included in ./mkspecs/linux-oe-g++/qmake.conf linux-oe-g++ being the only generic mkspecs that should be used in Yocto So! At the time the configuration enters

[yocto] Release Candidate Build for yocto-2.1.rc2.rc2 now available.

-e A release candidate build for yocto-2.1.rc2 is now available at: http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/releases/yocto-2.1.rc2 Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible. Build hash information: meta-intel : b6c9d76e184c219cca688ad309841084615e315d meta-fsl-arm : b2512d4365937c5

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][meta-selinux] refpolicy-minimum: port changes for prepare_policy_store

On 04/19/2016 11:34 AM, George McCollister wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:34 AM, wenzong fan > wrote: >> On 04/18/2016 05:02 AM, Philip Tricca wrote: >>> >>> Hello Wenzong, >>> >>> On 04/08/2016 01:19 AM, wenzong@windriver.com wrote: From: Wenzong Fan Apply the change